In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                 OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                          No. 13-293V
                                       Filed: June 2, 2014
                                       Not for Publication


*************************************
MATTHEW S. ROSSEN,                           *
as Personal Representative of the Estate of *
HOLLY L. ROSSEN,                             *
                                             *
              Petitioner,                    *
                                             *   Damages decision based on stipulation;
v.                                           *   Tdap vaccine; flu vaccine; Guillain-Barré
                                             *   Syndrome
SECRETARY OF HEALTH                          *
AND HUMAN SERVICES,                          *
                                             *
              Respondent.                    *
                                             *
*************************************
Anne C. Toale, Sarasota, FL, for petitioner.
Julia W. McInerny, Washington, DC, for respondent.


MILLMAN, Special Master

                              DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

        On June 2, 2014, the parties filed the attached stipulation in which they agreed to settle this
case and described the settlement terms. Petitioner alleges that his wife, Holly, suffered from
Guillain-Barré Syndrome (“GBS”) that was caused by her September 23, 2012, receipt of
Tetanus-diphtheria-acellular Pertussis (“Tdap”) and influenza (“flu”) vaccines. He further
alleges that Holly experienced the residual effects of this injury for more than six months and that

1
  Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master’s action in this
case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal
Claims’ website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899,
2913 (Dec. 17, 2002). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made
available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is
privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly
unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and
move to delete such information prior to the document’s disclosure. If the special master, upon review,
agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall
delete such material from public access.
Holly’s death was a sequela of her vaccine injury. Respondent denies that Holly suffered an
adverse reaction to her Tdap and/or flu vaccines, denies that Holly’s death was a sequela of her
GBS, and denies that her death was vaccine-related. Nonetheless, the parties agreed to resolve
this matter informally.

        The undersigned finds the terms of the stipulation to be reasonable. The court hereby
adopts the parties’ said stipulation, attached hereto, and awards compensation in the amount and
on the terms set forth therein. Pursuant to the stipulation, the court awards a lump sum of
$50,000.00, representing compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C.
§ 300aa-15(a) (2006). The award shall be in the form of a check for $50,000.00 made payable to
petitioner.

        In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the
court is directed to enter judgment herewith.2


IT IS SO ORDERED.


Dated: June 2, 2014                                                                s/ Laura D. Millman
                                                                                      Laura D. Millman
                                                                                       Special Master




2
  Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party, either separately or
jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
                                                    2