Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Purewal v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 1:11-vv-00244 (2014)

Court: United States Court of Federal Claims Number: 1:11-vv-00244 Visitors: 4
Judges: Christian J. Moran
Filed: Aug. 28, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ***************** *** SHISHPAL PUREWAL, * * Petitioner, * No. 11-244V v. * Special Master Christian J. Moran * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Filed: August 1, 2014 AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Attorneys’ fees and costs; award Respondent. * in the amount to which * respondent does not object. ******************** Isaiah Kalinowski, Maglio, Christopher & Toale, Washington, DC, for Petitioner; Lindsay Corliss, U.S. Department of Justice, Wash
More
    In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                              OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

***************** ***
SHISHPAL PUREWAL,        *
                         *
             Petitioner, *                           No. 11-244V
v.                       *                           Special Master Christian J. Moran
                         *
SECRETARY OF HEALTH      *                           Filed: August 1, 2014
AND HUMAN SERVICES,      *
                         *                           Attorneys’ fees and costs; award
             Respondent. *                           in the amount to which
                         *                           respondent does not object.
********************
Isaiah Kalinowski, Maglio, Christopher & Toale, Washington, DC, for Petitioner;
Lindsay Corliss, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

               UNPUBLISHED DECISION ON FEES AND COSTS1

       On July 29, 2014, petitioner filed a stipulation of fact concerning final
attorneys’ fees and costs in the above-captioned matter. Previously, petitioner
informally submitted a draft application for attorneys’ fees and costs to respondent
for review. Upon review of petitioner’s application, respondent raised objections
to certain items. Based on subsequent discussions, petitioner amended his
application to request $29,792.88, an amount to which respondent does not object.
The Court awards this amount.

       On April 18, 2011, Shishpal Purewal filed a petition for compensation
alleging that the Hepatitis A vaccine, which he received on October 29, 2009,
caused him to suffer Guillain-Barré Syndrome (“GBS”). Petitioner received
compensation based upon the parties’ stipulation. Decision, filed Apr. 21, 2014.


       1
          The E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17,
2002), requires that the Court post this decision on its website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b),
the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of medical information or other
information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4). Any redactions ordered by the special
master will appear in the document posted on the website.
Because petitioner received compensation, he is entitled to an award of attorneys’
fees and costs. 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e).

       Petitioner seeks a total of $29,792.88 in attorneys’ fees and costs for his
counsel. Additionally, in compliance with General Order No. 9, petitioner states
that he did not incur any in out-of-pocket litigation expenses while pursuing this
claim. Respondent has no objection to the amount requested for attorneys’ fees
and costs.1

        After reviewing the request, the Court awards the following:

        A lump sum of $29,792.88 in the form of a check made payable to
        petitioner and petitioner’s attorney, Isaiah Kalinowski, for attorneys’
        fees and other litigation costs available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e).

      The Court thanks the parties for their cooperative efforts in resolving this
matter. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.

        Any questions may be directed to my law clerk, Mary Holmes, at (202) 357-
6353.

        IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                                      s/Christian J. Moran
                                                      Christian J. Moran
                                                      Special Master




        1
         The attorneys’ fees are relatively higher than typical cases because the petitioner’s
attorney was required to obtain medical records from India.

                                                 2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer