Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Zacchia v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 14-493 (2014)

Court: United States Court of Federal Claims Number: 14-493 Visitors: 2
Judges: Lisa Hamilton-Fieldman
Filed: Dec. 29, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 14-493V Filed: December 5, 2014 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * UNPUBLISHED ALFRED ZACCHIA, * * Special Master Hamilton-Fieldman Petitioner, * * v. * Attorneys’ Fees and Costs; * Reasonable Amount Requested SECRETARY OF HEALTH * to Which Respondent Does Not AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Object. * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Thomas P. Gallagher, Somers Point, NJ, for Petitioner. Lindsay Corliss, United States Dep
More
    In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                             OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                           No. 14-493V
                                     Filed: December 5, 2014

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *                               UNPUBLISHED
ALFRED ZACCHIA,               *
                              *                               Special Master Hamilton-Fieldman
          Petitioner,         *
                              *
v.                            *                               Attorneys’ Fees and Costs;
                              *                               Reasonable Amount Requested
SECRETARY OF HEALTH           *                               to Which Respondent Does Not
AND HUMAN SERVICES,           *                               Object.
                              *
          Respondent.         *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Thomas P. Gallagher, Somers Point, NJ, for Petitioner.
Lindsay Corliss, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

                                            DECISION1

        On June 9, 2014, Alfred Zacchia (“Petitioner”) filed a petition pursuant to the National
Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.2 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 et seq. (2006) (“Vaccine Act”).
Petitioner alleged that he suffered from Acquired Factor VIII Deficiency and that this injury had
been caused by the Tetanus vaccine he received on August 2, 2011. Petition (“Pet”) at 1. On
October 3, 2014, the undersigned issued a decision dismissing the case for insufficient proof.


1
  Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s action in this case,
the undersigned intends to post this ruling on the website of the United States Court of Federal
Claims, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116
Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). As provided by
Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any
information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in
substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule
18(b).
2
  The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National
Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended,
42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (2006) (Vaccine Act or the Act). All citations in this decision to
individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa.


                                                  1
       On December 4, 2014, the parties filed a Stipulation of Fact Concerning Attorneys’ Fees
and Costs. This stipulation requests a total payment of $14,526.62, representing total attorneys’
fees and costs. In compliance with General Order #9, Petitioner represents that no personal, out-
of-pocket expenses were incurred in proceeding on the petition.

       The undersigned finds that the petition was brought in good faith and that there existed a
reasonable basis for the claim. Therefore, an award for fees and costs is appropriate, pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(b) and (e)(1). Further, the proposed amount seems reasonable and
appropriate. Accordingly, the undersigned hereby awards the amount of $14,526.62, in the
form of a check made payable jointly to Petitioner and Petitioner’s counsel, Thomas P.
Gallagher, Esq.

         In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of
the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’
stipulation.

       IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                             s/ Lisa Hamilton-Fieldman
                                             Lisa Hamilton-Fieldman
                                             Special Master




                                                2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer