Judges: Nora Beth Dorsey
Filed: Nov. 17, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 15-0684V Filed: October 27, 2015 Unpublished **************************** ROBERT NOLOP, * * Petitioner, * Damages Decision Based on Proffer; * Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury * Related to Vaccine Administration SECRETARY OF HEALTH * (SIRVA); Special Processing Unit AND HUMAN SERVICES, * (SPU) * Respondent. * * **************************** Mark Paul Schloegel, Popham Law Firm, Kansas City, MO, for petitioner. Clau
Summary: In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 15-0684V Filed: October 27, 2015 Unpublished **************************** ROBERT NOLOP, * * Petitioner, * Damages Decision Based on Proffer; * Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury * Related to Vaccine Administration SECRETARY OF HEALTH * (SIRVA); Special Processing Unit AND HUMAN SERVICES, * (SPU) * Respondent. * * **************************** Mark Paul Schloegel, Popham Law Firm, Kansas City, MO, for petitioner. Claud..
More
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 15-0684V
Filed: October 27, 2015
Unpublished
****************************
ROBERT NOLOP, *
*
Petitioner, * Damages Decision Based on Proffer;
* Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury
* Related to Vaccine Administration
SECRETARY OF HEALTH * (SIRVA); Special Processing Unit
AND HUMAN SERVICES, * (SPU)
*
Respondent. *
*
****************************
Mark Paul Schloegel, Popham Law Firm, Kansas City, MO, for petitioner.
Claudia Barnes Gangi, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1
Dorsey, Chief Special Master:
On June 30, 2015, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National
Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 [the “Vaccine
Act”]. Petitioner alleges that he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine
administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza vaccine he received on October 24,
2012. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the
Office of Special Masters.
On September 28, 2015, the undersigned issued a ruling on entitlement, finding
petitioner entitled to compensation. On October 26, 2015, respondent filed a proffer on
award of compensation [“Proffer”] stating that petitioner should be awarded $86,885.92.
Proffer at 3. In the Proffer, respondent represents that petitioner agrees with the
1
Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the
undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with
the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended
at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to
identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an
unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits
within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.
2
National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).
proffered award. Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner
is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.
Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards:
a lump sum payment of $86,885.92, in the form of a check payable to
petitioner, Robert Nolop, representing compensation for pain and suffering
($85,000.00), and past unreimbursable expenses ($1,885.92). This amount
represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 300aa-
15(a).
The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this
decision.3
s/Nora Beth Dorsey
Nora Beth Dorsey
Chief Special Master
3
Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.
2
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
____________________________________
)
ROBERT NOLOP )
)
Petitioner, )
) No. 15-684V
v. ) Chief Special Master Dorsey
) ECF
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND )
HUMAN SERVICES, )
)
Respondent. )
____________________________________)
RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
On June 30, 2015, Robert Nolop (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the
Vaccine Act. Petitioner alleges that he received an influenza vaccine in his left arm on October
24, 2012, and subsequently suffered from a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration
(“SIRVA”) secondary to the vaccination. Petition at 1. The Secretary of Health and Human
Services (“respondent”) filed a Vaccine Rule 4(c) report, conceding that petitioner suffered
SIRVA, and recommending that the Court award petitioner compensation. On September 28,
2015, the Chief Special Master issued an Entitlement Decision and a Damages Order.
Respondent hereby submits the following proffer regarding the award of compensation.
I. Items of Compensation
A. Future Medical Care Expenses
Respondent proffers that based on the evidence of record, petitioner is not entitled to an
award for projected unreimbursable medical care expenses incurred from the date of judgment as
provided under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(1)(A). Petitioner agrees.
1
B. Lost Earnings
Respondent proffers that based on the evidence of record, petitioner is not entitled to an
award for lost earnings as provided under the Vaccine Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(3)(A).
Petitioner agrees.
C. Pain and Suffering
Respondent proffers that the Court should award Robert Nolop a lump sum of $85,000.00
for his actual and projected pain and suffering. This amount reflects that the award for projected
pain and suffering has been reduced to net present value. See § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner
agrees.
D. Past Unreimbursable Expenses
Evidence supplied by petitioner documents Robert Nolop’s expenditure of past
unreimubursable expenses as a result of his vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that the
Court should award Robert Nolop a lump sum of $1,885.92 for past unreimbursable expenses as
provided under the Vaccine Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(1)(A). Petitioner agrees.
E. Medicaid Lien
Petitioner represents that there are no outstanding Medicaid liens related to his vaccine-
related injury.
II. Form of the Award
The parties recommend that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made
through a lump sum payment as described below and request that the Chief Special Master’s
decision and the Court’s judgment award the following 1: a lump sum payment of $86,885.92,
1
Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate
relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future pain and suffering.
2
representing compensation for pain and suffering ($85,000.00), and past unreimbursable
expenses ($1,885.92), in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Robert Nolop.
III. Summary of Recommended Payment Following Judgment
Lump sum payable to petitioner: $86,885.92
Respectfully submitted,
BENJAMIN C. MIZER
Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General
RUPA BHATTACHARYYA
Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
VINCENT J. MATANOSKI
Deputy Director
Torts Branch, Civil Division
GLENN A. MACLEOD
Senior Trial Counsel
Torts Branch, Civil Division
/s/ Claudia B. Gangi
CLAUDIA B. GANGI
Senior Trial Attorney
Torts Branch, Civil Division
U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 146
Ben Franklin Station
Washington, D.C. 20044-0146
Direct dial: (202) 616-4138
Date: October 26, 2015
3