Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Tadio v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 12-829 (2016)

Court: United States Court of Federal Claims Number: 12-829 Visitors: 7
Judges: Thomas L. Gowen
Filed: Mar. 18, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 12-829V Filed: February 23, 2016 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * UNPUBLISHED CHEYLYNN TADIO and DELTON * THOMAS, on behalf of their child, * K.T., a minor, * * Special Master Gowen Petitioners, * * v. * Attorneys’ Fees and Costs * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Danielle A. Strait, Maglio Christopher and Toale, Washington, DC, for petitioner. Julia McInerny, Un
More
        In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                               OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                              No. 12-829V
                                       Filed: February 23, 2016

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *                                    UNPUBLISHED
CHEYLYNN TADIO and DELTON         *
THOMAS, on behalf of their child, *
K.T., a minor,                    *
                                  *                                Special Master Gowen
               Petitioners,       *
                                  *
v.                                *                                Attorneys’ Fees and Costs
                                  *
SECRETARY OF HEALTH               *
AND HUMAN SERVICES,               *
                                  *
               Respondent.        *
                                  *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Danielle A. Strait, Maglio Christopher and Toale, Washington, DC, for petitioner.
Julia McInerny, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

                       DECISION ON ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS1

        On November 30, 2012, Cheylynn Tadio and Delton Thomas (“petitioners”) filed a
petition for compensation on behalf of their minor child, K.T., under the National Vaccine Injury
Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 – 34 (2012)2 (the “Vaccine Act” or “the
Program”). Petitioners alleged that as a result of receiving an influenza (“flu”) vaccination on
November 8, 2010, K.T. developed Guillain-Barre Syndrome (“GBS”). Petition at ¶ 11. The
parties filed a stipulation awarding compensation to petitioners on May 30, 2014, and a decision
1
 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s action in this case, the
undersigned intends to post this ruling on the website of the United States Court of Federal Claims, in
accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.C.S. § 3501 note (2012)(Federal Management and
Promotion of Electronic Government Services). As provided by Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14
days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade
secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes
medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of
privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b).
2
 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood
Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§
300aa-1 to -34 (2012) (Vaccine Act or the Act). All citations in this decision to individual sections of the
Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa.


                                                      1
adopting the parties’ stipulation was issued the same day. Judgment was entered on June 6,
2014.

        On February 23, 2016, the parties filed a Stipulation of Fact concerning attorneys’ fees
and costs. Petitioners request a total award of attorneys’ fees and costs of $49,197.04. Stip. of
Fact ¶ 6. This amount represents: $35,982.04 in attorneys’ fees and attorneys’ costs for
petitioners’ counsel of record, Danielle A. Strait; $5,000.00 in attorneys’ fees for petitioners’
former counsel, Kimberly A. Jackson; and $8,000.00 for petitioners’ costs associated with
maintaining K.T.’s conservatorship. 
Id. at ¶
2-5. Pursuant to General Order #9, petitioners’
counsel also represents that petitioners incurred $215.00 in costs for establishing the
conservatorship. 
Id. at ¶
3. The parties’ stipulation indicates that respondent does not object to
the above fees and costs. 
Id. at ¶
3-5.

        The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. 42 U.S.C. §
300 aa-15(e). Based on the reasonableness of petitioner’s request, the undersigned GRANTS
the request for approval and payment of attorneys’ fees and costs.

       Accordingly, an award should be made as follows:

       (1) A lump sum of $35,982.04 in the form of a check payable jointly to petitioners
           and petitioners’ counsel of record, Danielle A. Strait, for attorneys’ fees and
           costs.

       (2) A lump sum of $5,000.00 in the form of a check payable jointly to petitioners
           and petitioners’ former counsel, Kimberly A. Jackson, for past attorneys’ fees.

       (3) A lump sum of $8,215.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioners for the
           costs of establishing and maintaining a conservatorship for K.T.

       In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of
the court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance herewith.3

       IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                               s/ Thomas L. Gowen
                                               Thomas L. Gowen
                                               Special Master




3
  Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.

                                                   2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer