In the United States Court of Federal Claims
                                 OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
                                          No. 15-1144V
                                      Filed: June 23, 2016
                                         UNPUBLISHED

****************************
M.M., a minor, by and through her,        *
Parent and Natural Guardian,              *
LACY MIRON,                               *
                                          *
                     Petitioner,          *      Joint Stipulation on Damages;
v.                                        *      Influenza;
                                          *      Guillain Barre Syndrome (“GBS”);
SECRETARY OF HEALTH                       *      Special Processing Unit (“SPU”)
AND HUMAN SERVICES,                       *
                                          *
                     Respondent.          *
                                          *
****************************
Maximillian Muller, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner.
Alexis Babcock, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

                              DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION 1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master:

        On October 7, 2015, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the
“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that M.M. suffered Guillain Barre Syndrome (“GBS”)
caused by her September 24, 2014 influenza vaccination. Petition at 1; Stipulation, filed
June 23, 2016, at ¶ 4. Petitioner further alleges that M.M experienced residual effects
of her injury lasting at least six months and there has been no prior award or settlement
of a civil action for damages as a result of M.M.’s alleged GBS. Petition at 3-4;
Stipulation at ¶¶ 4-5. “Respondent denies that M.M.’s alleged injuries were caused-in-
fact by her flu or any other vaccination, and denies that vaccines caused any other
injury or her current condition. ” Stipulation at ¶ 6.


1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the
undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with
the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of
Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to
identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an
unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits
within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).
        Nevertheless, on June 23, 2016, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation,
stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. The undersigned
finds the stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding
damages, on the terms set forth therein.

        The parties stipulate that petitioner shall receive the following compensation:

        A lump sum of $125,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner as
        guardian/conservator of the estate of M.M. for the benefit of M.M.
        Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of
        damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). 

approves the requested amount for petitioner’s compensation.
In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of
the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                          s/Nora Beth Dorsey
                                          Nora Beth Dorsey
                                          Chief Special Master




3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.