Judges: Nora Beth Dorsey
Filed: Sep. 11, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 17-2060V Filed: June 26, 2019 UNPUBLISHED SYLVIA D. WISEMAN, Petitioner, v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); Joint Stipulation on Damages; Influenza SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury HUMAN SERVICES, Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) Respondent. Kathy Ann Lee, Cline, Farrell, et al., Indianapolis, IN, for petitioner. Adriana Ruth Teitel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
Summary: In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 17-2060V Filed: June 26, 2019 UNPUBLISHED SYLVIA D. WISEMAN, Petitioner, v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); Joint Stipulation on Damages; Influenza SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury HUMAN SERVICES, Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) Respondent. Kathy Ann Lee, Cline, Farrell, et al., Indianapolis, IN, for petitioner. Adriana Ruth Teitel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. ..
More
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 17-2060V
Filed: June 26, 2019
UNPUBLISHED
SYLVIA D. WISEMAN,
Petitioner,
v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); Joint
Stipulation on Damages; Influenza
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury
HUMAN SERVICES, Related to Vaccine Administration
(SIRVA)
Respondent.
Kathy Ann Lee, Cline, Farrell, et al., Indianapolis, IN, for petitioner.
Adriana Ruth Teitel, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.
DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1
Dorsey, Chief Special Master:
On December 29, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the
“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered adhesive capsulitis and a rotator
cuff tear as a consequence of the influenza (“flu”) vaccine she received on January 13,
2015, and further alleges that she experienced the residual effects of her injury for more
than six months. Petition at 1,13; Stipulation, filed June 24, 2019, at ¶¶ 2,4.
“Respondent denies that petitioner suffered a Table injury, and denies that petitioner's
alleged shoulder injuries and their residual effects were caused-in-fact by her flu
vaccine.” Stipulation at ¶ 6.
1
The undersigned intends to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website.
This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with
Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,
the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the
undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such
material from public access. Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the
action in this case, undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims'
website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal
Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services).
2
National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for
ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §
300aa (2012).
Nevertheless, on June 24, 2019, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation,
stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. The undersigned
finds the stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding
damages, on the terms set forth therein.
Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, the undersigned
awards the following compensation:
A lump sum of $95,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner.
Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of
damages that would be available under § 15(a).
Id.
The undersigned approves the requested amount for petitioner’s compensation.
In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of
the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Nora Beth Dorsey
Nora Beth Dorsey
Chief Special Master
3
Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice
renouncing the right to seek review.
2