Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY vs. LORRAINE MCCORMICK HITCHCOCK, 75-000525 (1975)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 75-000525 Visitors: 18
Judges: K. N. AYERS
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Latest Update: Jan. 19, 1977
Summary: Respondent caught practicing cosmetology without a license is not under the jurisdiction of either hearing officer or board. Dismiss complaint.
75-0525.PDF

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) CASE NO. 75-525

) LORRAINE McCORMICK HITCHCOCK, )

)

Respondent. )

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


Pursuant to notice, the Division of Administrative Hearings by its duly designated hearing officer, K. N. Ayers, held a public hearing on the above matter on June 16, 1975, in Ft. Lauderdale, Florida.


APPEARANCES


For Petitioner: Ronald C. LaFace

Board of Cosmetology Post Office Box 1752 Tallahassee, Florida


For Respondent: No appearance


By this complaint, the Board seeks to revoke, annul, withdraw or suspend the license of Lorraine McCormick Hitchcock on the grounds that on December 31, 1974, she did practice cosmetology on a Dianne Osmond without having a Florida cosmetology license in the Hair Hub Beauty Salon in Pompano Beach, Florida, in violation of Section 477.02(1) and (3), Florida Statutes. Ms. Hitchcock was not present at the hearing, but on an Election of Remedies form submitted a plea of not guilty and a statement which was considered by the Hearing Officer, Exhibit 1, receipt for Notice of Hearing sent by certified mail, was admitted into evidence.


The inspector for the State Board of Cosmetology visited the salon in question on December 31, 1974. Upon his entry he noticed Ms. Hitchcock in the middle of a comb out of the hair of one Dianne Osmond. He asked her name and to see her license. She stated that she did not have a license, did not work there, and was only combing the hair of a friend.


Violations of Section 477.02, Florida Statutes constitutes a misdemeanor in the second degree, the jurisdiction over which is vested solely in the judicial system. Accordingly, neither the Board nor the Hearing Officer has jurisdiction to consider this complaint. It is therefore,


RECOMMENDED that this complaint be dismissed.

DONE and ENTERED this 3rd day of July, 1975.


K. N. AYERS, Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings Room 530, Carlton Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304

(904) 488-9675


Docket for Case No: 75-000525
Issue Date Proceedings
Jan. 19, 1977 Final Order filed.
Jul. 03, 1975 Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED.

Orders for Case No: 75-000525
Issue Date Document Summary
Sep. 17, 1975 Agency Final Order
Jul. 03, 1975 Recommended Order Respondent caught practicing cosmetology without a license is not under the jurisdiction of either hearing officer or board. Dismiss complaint.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer