STATE OF FLORIDA
DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, )
)
Petitioner, )
)
vs. ) CASE NO. 75-2068T
)
CHIPLEY MOTEL, INC., )
)
Respondent. )
)
RECOMMENDED ORDER
After due notice, this cause came on for hearing before Delphene Strickland, Hearing Officer, Division of Administrative Hearings Department of Administration in the Conference Room, Department of Transportation, Chipley, Florida, on March 2, 1976, at 11:30 a.m.
APPEARANCES
For Petitioner: Philip S. Bennett, Esquire
Office of Legal Operations Department of Transportation Haydon Burns Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304
For Respondent: Bob Deal, Esquire
Cole and Deal
204-A South Third Street Chipley, Florida 32428
ISSUE
Whether the Respondent is in violation of Sections 479.07(1)(2)(3)(4) and (6), Florida Statutes; Sections 479.11(1)(2), Florida Statutes; and Section 479.02, Florida Statutes, which require a person to submit am application for a permit, pay permit fees, secure a permit before erecting any outdoor advertising sign. Such permit will not be granted if it is within the prohibited areas of Section 479.11, F.S., and are subject to removal under Section 479.02, F.S.; Section 479.17, F.S.; and Section 479.20, F.S.
FINDINGS OF FACT
No permit was applied for or secured for the following described signs: Copy: Chipley Motel
Location: .15 miles east of State Road 273 (Orange Hill Highway)
Highway: I-10
Copy: Chipley Motel
Location: 3-9/10 miles east of State Road 77 Highway: U.S. 90
Copy: Chipley Motel Restaurant
Location: 1-4/10 miles west of State Road 77, South side
Highway: I-10
No permit was applied for before subject signs were erected and subject signs are nearer than 660 feet from the nearest edge of an interstate highway.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
Chapter 479 F.S., regulates the outdoor advertising signs along the highways of the State of Florida. The Petitioner, Department of Transportation, is required to enforce the provisions of the outdoor advertising acts. The Respondent is in violation of the sections of the statute which require outdoor advertising signs to be permitted by the Department of Transportation and such signs are ineligible for permits inasmuch as they violate the set back requirements of the statute.
Remove subject signs if they are not removed by the Respondent within ten days after the entry of a final order.
DONE and ORDERED this 7th day of May, 1976.
DELPHENE C. STRICKLAND
Hearing Officer
Division of Administrative Hearings Room 530, Carlton Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304
(904) 488-9675
COPIES FURNISHED:
Philip S. Bennett, Esquire Office of Legal Operations Department of Transportation Haydon Burns Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304
Bob Deal, Esquire Cole and Deal
204-A South Third Street Chipley, Florida 32428
Issue Date | Proceedings |
---|---|
Feb. 11, 1977 | Final Order filed. |
May 07, 1976 | Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED. |
Issue Date | Document | Summary |
---|---|---|
Jul. 19, 1976 | Agency Final Order | |
May 07, 1976 | Recommended Order | Respondent's signs are unpermitted and violate set-back requirements. Recommend removal. |
QUALITY SIGNS OF PORT ST. LUCIE vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, 75-002068 (1975)
GATOR OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, INC. vs. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, 75-002068 (1975)
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs. BUENA VISTA MOTEL, INC., 75-002068 (1975)
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs. EMPIRE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, INC., 75-002068 (1975)
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs. J. L. CARPENTER, 75-002068 (1975)