Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

SEALTEST FOODS, A DIVISION OF KRAFTCO CORPORATION vs. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES, 76-000278 (1976)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 76-000278 Visitors: 8
Judges: CHARLES C. ADAMS
Agency: Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
Latest Update: Apr. 30, 1980
Summary: Whether or not the Petitioner should be entitled to an extension of the shelf life on its milk and milk products from a ten day period to a twelve day period.Petitioner entitled to shelf life of twelve days for its dairy products.
76-0278.PDF

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


SEALTEST FOODS, A DIVISION OF ) KRAFTCO CORPORATION, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) CASE NO. 76-278

) FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ) AND CONSUMER SERVICES, )

)

Respondent. )

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


Pursuant to notice, a hearing was held before Charles C. Adams, Hearing Officer with the Division of Administrative Hearings at State Office Building, corner of West Morse Boulevard, Winter Park, Florida at 10:00 A.M., April 28, 1976.


APPEARANCES


For Petitioner: R. D. Saunders, Zone Manager

Sealtest Foods

109 Governors Street Tampa, Florida 33602


For Respondent: Jack Shoemaker, Esquire

Resident Counsel

515 Mayo Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304


ISSUE


Whether or not the Petitioner should be entitled to an extension of the shelf life on its milk and milk products from a ten day period to a twelve day period.


FINDINGS OF FACT


  1. Testimony offered by Jay Boosinger, Director of Dairy Industry, for the Department of Agriculture and Gene Smith, Supervisor of Dairy Products Inspection Enforcement, indicated that the Respondent had investigated the request for extension of shelf life from ten days to twelve days on the milk and milk products of the Petitioner. Based on the laboratory analysis of the test samples, they felt that the request should be accepted. This position was stated notwithstanding the fact that the samples taken in the Miami plant were limited in numbers, due to the fact that the petition for extension of shelf life was filed later than a similar petition filed by the Petitioner. Jay Boasinger has as his duty the direction of the program which is designed to regulate the quality of dairy products within the State of Florida. Gene Smith,

    as his title indicates, is charged with the function of inspection and enforcement of the laws and regulations associated with the diary industry in the State of Florida.


  2. Testimony was offered in this hearing which indicated that certain samples of the Petitioner's milk and milk products had been collected at the Petitioner's Miami, Florida plant, the Petitioner's trucks and selected stores which were serviced by the Petitioner. These samples were collected by a dairy plant specialist of the Respondent and in turn were taken to a laboratory of the Respondent for analysis. The laboratory analysis was designed to ultimately determine the number of days that the samples would be acceptable beyond the code expiration date found on the container, which expiration date would have been at the ten day point. There is an exhibit, which is Respondent's Exhibit #1 that identifies the product, collection point, the established expiration date, the laboratory evaluation date and the days that the product was found to be acceptable beyond the ten day, established expiration date. In addition this exhibit contains the laboratory analysis of the products together with attendant correspondence on the issue of the extension of the shelf life. The test samples in Respondent's Exhibit #1 show in the date acceptable pass column, how many days past the ten days the product would have held up without losing flavor and becoming unacceptable in terms of shelf life.


  3. The laboratory analyses and summary of those analyses showed available shelf life above the ten day life expressed in the regulation found in Chapter 5D-104(7)(d), Florida Administrative Code.


    CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


  4. It is concluded as a matter of law that the testimony produced in the hearing has sufficiently established the necessary supporting justification to cause the Respondent to grant specific authority for allowing a shelf life for the milk and milk products of the Petitioner to be extended to twelve days.

Such extension would be in keeping with Section 502.042(2), Florida Statutes and Chapter 5D-104(7)(d), Florida Administrative Code.


RECOMMENDATION


It is recommended that the Respondent grant a shelf life of twelve days on the milk and milk products identified in the course of the hearing held on the question of the petition.


DONE and ENTERED this 15th day of June, 1976, in Tallahassee, Florida.


CHARLES C. ADAMS, Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings Room 530, Carlton Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304

(904) 488-9675

COPIES FURNISHED:


R. D. Saunders, Zone Manager Sealtest Foods

109 Governors Street Tampa, Florida 33602


Jack Shoemaker, Esquire Resident Counsel

515 Mayo Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304


Docket for Case No: 76-000278
Issue Date Proceedings
Apr. 30, 1980 Final Order filed.
Jun. 01, 1976 Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED.

Orders for Case No: 76-000278
Issue Date Document Summary
Apr. 29, 1980 Agency Final Order
Jun. 01, 1976 Recommended Order Petitioner entitled to shelf life of twelve days for its dairy products.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer