Judges: THOMAS C. OLDHAM
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Latest Update: Oct. 06, 1977
Summary: Respondent's alleged violation of Section 477.02(6), Florida Statutes. Counsel for Petitioner announced that he had been unable to serve Respondent with a copy of the Administrative Complaint and Notice of Hearing. He further stated that Respondent no longer holds a Certificate of Registration to operate a cosmetology salon because Tippie's Beauty salon which she formerly operated is no longer in business. He further stated that he had no objection to a dismissal of the charge.Dismiss Petitioner
Summary: Respondent's alleged violation of Section 477.02(6), Florida Statutes. Counsel for Petitioner announced that he had been unable to serve Respondent with a copy of the Administrative Complaint and Notice of Hearing. He further stated that Respondent no longer holds a Certificate of Registration to operate a cosmetology salon because Tippie's Beauty salon which she formerly operated is no longer in business. He further stated that he had no objection to a dismissal of the charge.Dismiss Petitioner's claim because Respondent no longer holds the license.
More
76-1061.PDFSTATE OF FLORIDA
DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF )
COSMETOLOGY, )
)
Petitioner, )
)
vs. ) CASE NO. 76-1061
)
BARBARA SPENCE )
d/b/a TIPPIE'S BEAUTY SALON )
209 S.W. 27 Avenue )
Fort Lauderdale, Florida )
)
Respondent. )
)
RECOMMENDED ORDER
A hearing was held in the above-captioned matter, after due notice to the parties, at Fort Lauderdale, Florida, on June 29, 1976, before the undersigned Hearing Officer.
APPEARANCES
For Petitioner: Ronald C. LaFace, Esquire
Post Office Box 1752 Tallahassee, Florida
For Respondent: None
ISSUE PRESENTED
Respondent's alleged violation of Section 477.02(6), Florida Statutes. Counsel for Petitioner announced that he had been unable to serve
Respondent with a copy of the Administrative Complaint and Notice of Hearing. He further stated that Respondent no longer holds a Certificate of Registration to operate a cosmetology salon because Tippie's Beauty salon which she formerly operated is no longer in business. He further stated that he had no objection to a dismissal of the charge.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
Petitioner alleges that Respondent permitted one Kathy Kadick to practice cosmetology in her salon without having a Florida cosmetologist license. The Notice of Violation was dated April 26, 1975. The Petitioner seeks to suspend or revoke Respondent's salon Certificate of Registration No. 20129 OB for violation of Section 477.02(6), Florida Statutes.
In view of the fact that Respondent no longer holds an active Certificate of Registration and since there are no provisions in the applicable
statutes or regulations providing for renewal or reactivation of such a Certificate, it is concluded that the allegation should be dismissed.
RECOMMENDATION
That the allegation against Respondent be dismissed.
DONE and ENTERED this 28th day of July, 1976, in Tallahassee, Florida.
THOMAS C. OLDHAM
Hearing Officer
Division of Administrative Hearings Room 530, Carlton Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304
COPIES FURNISHED:
Ronald C. LaFace, Esquire Post Office Box 1752 Tallahassee, Florida
Barbara Spence
c/o Tippie's Beauty Salon
209 S.W. 27 Avenue
Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Docket for Case No: 76-001061
Orders for Case No: 76-001061
