STATE OF FLORIDA
DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
STATE BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY, )
)
Petitioner, )
)
vs. ) CASE NO. 78-517
) ODELL HINES and D. SPRAY HINES, ) d/b/a THE ROOSTER'S COMB, )
)
Respondent. )
)
RECOMMENDED ORDER
This matter came on for hearing in Gainesville, Florida, before the Division of Administrative Hearings, by its duly designated Hearing Officer, Robert T. Benton, II, on June 16, 1975.
For Petitioner: Daniel J. Wiser, Esquire
Post Office Box 1752 Tallahassee, Florida 32302
For Respondents: The respondents appeared on their own
behalf.
By administrative complaint dated March 22, 1978, petitioner alleged that respondents "on March 7, 1978, did operate a cosmetology salon without displaying in a conspicuous place adjacent to or near the work chair or booth a Certificate of Registration as required in the salon."
FINDINGS OF FACT
Odell Hines and Dorothy Spray Hines (who are man and wife) operate the Rooster's Comb, a beauty salon in Gainesville, Florida. A building with exterior dimensions of 18 feet in width and 60 feet in length houses the shop, a single room in which there are several booths manned by respondents and nine or ten employees. Every employee does not work every day. Although, with the exception of a couple of "floaters," each operator is assigned a particular booth or station, no one operator works in the same place all of the time.
Cosmetology licenses or certificates of registration issued to respondents and their employees are all posted on a bulletin board. The bulletin board, which weighs approximately one and one half pounds, leans against a wall, so that the licenses are plainly visible, and is situated within
20 feet of every operator who is working and about three feet from the manicurist.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
Petitioner takes the position that this arrangement violates Section 477.13(1), Florida Statutes (1977), which requires that "[e]very holder of a
certificate of registration . . . display it in a conspicuous place adjacent to or near his workchair or booth." The evidence established, however, that respondents and their employees were in compliance with this requirement, i.e., that their certificates of registration were conspicuously displayed in a place "near" their workchairs or booths, within the meaning of Section 477.13(1), Florida Statutes (1977).
Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is RECOMMENDED:
That petitioner dismiss the administrative complaint against respondents. DONE and ENTERED this 14th day of July, 1978, in Tallahassee, Florida.
ROBERT T. BENTON, II
Hearing Officer
Division of Administrative Hearings Room 530, Carlton Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304
(904) 488-9675
COPIES FURNISHED:
Daniel J. Wiser, Esquire Post Office Box 1752 Tallahassee, Florida 32302
D. Spray Hines and Odell Hines
d/b/a The Rooster's Comb, Inc. 2405 S. W. 13th Street Gainesville, Florida 32608
Issue Date | Proceedings |
---|---|
Jul. 14, 1978 | Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED. |
Issue Date | Document | Summary |
---|---|---|
Jul. 14, 1978 | Recommended Order | Respondents displayed licenses on bulletin board in shop, not at specific workstations. Recommended Order: not violative because licenses are "near" operators. Dismiss complaint. |
BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY vs. PATRICIA J. CANTRELL AND SHARON RISELING, 78-000517 (1978)
BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY vs. EILEEN WARREN, D/B/A STYLES BY STALLONE, 78-000517 (1978)
BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY vs. MARIE J. JEUNE, D/B/A JOSET`S BEAUTY SALON, 78-000517 (1978)
BOARD OF COSMETOLOGY vs. CLODOALDO AND OLIMPIA LINARES, 78-000517 (1978)