Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO vs. SOUTH FLORIDA LIQUOR DISTRIBUTORS, INC., 78-002150 (1978)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 78-002150 Visitors: 16
Judges: ROBERT T. BENTON, II
Agency: Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Latest Update: Dec. 29, 1978
Summary: Respondent is guilty of aiding one of its licensed customers to undercut competition by selling to it at a lower price in violation of statute. Fine of $1000.
78-2150.PDF

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC )

BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) CASE NO. 78-2150

) DABT NO. 8-77-50-A

SOUTH FLORIDA LIQUOR )

DISTRIBUTORS, INC., )

)

Respondent. )

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


This matter came on for final hearing in Miami, Florida, before the Division of Administrative Hearings, by its duly designated Hearing Officer, Robert T. Benton, II, on December 6, 1978. The parties were represented by counsel:


APPEARANCES


For Petitioner: Dennis E. LaRosa, Esquire

Staff Attorney

725 South Bronough Street Tallahassee, Florida 32304


For Respondent: Charles L. Curtis, Esquire

200 Southeast First Street, Suite 808 Miami, Florida 33131


By notice to show cause, petitioner alleged that respondent "[o]n or about the 29th of July, 1977, . . . did conspire with PIEROTH BROTHERS, INC., and SHELL'S CITY LIQUORS to sell SHELL'S LIQUORS merchandise at a price not available to other vendors, in violation of F.S. 561.42 . . . [and] contrary to

    1. 562.23;" and that respondent did, at the same time, "assist a retail vendor, to wit: SHELL CITY LIQUORS, by the giving of gifts, loans of money or property or by the giving of rebates . . . by selling merchandise at a price not available to other vendors . . . contrary to F.S. 561.42(1)."


      FINDINGS OF FACT


      1. At the hearing, the parties stipulated that so much of the attached narrative as has not been lined out accurately recites all facts pertinent to the present dispute. This narrative, as redacted by counsel, is hereby adopted and made a part of the recommended order.


        CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


      2. A licensed distributor like respondent is forbidden to "assist any vendor by any gifts or loans of money or property of any description or by the

        giving of any rebates of any kind whatsoever. Section 561.42(1), Florida Statutes (1977). The agreed upon statement of facts and the exhibits received in evidence establish that respondent assisted a vendor of alcoholic beverages by selling the vendor six cases and three bottles of Flonheimer Adelberg Eiswein Auslese at less than a quarter of the going price. Pieroth Wine Imports, Inc. (Pieroth), an importer not licensed in Florida, had supplied the wine to respondent. Respondent sold the wine to the vendor at Pieroth's instance and was subsequently reimbursed by Pieroth in the amount of $1,373.76.


      3. Because it rendered such assistance to a vendor as part of an agreement with Pieroth's employees, respondent is also guilty of a conspiracy to violate Section 561.42(1), Florida Statutes (1977), which is itself a violation of Section 562.23, Florida Statutes (1977). Both violations arise out of a single transaction, however.


RECOMMENDATION


Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is RECOMMEND:

That petitioner impose a civil penalty against respondent in the amount of one thousand dollars ($1,000.00).


DONE and ENTERED this 29th day of December, 1978, in Tallahassee, Florida.


ROBERT T. BENTON, II

Hearing Officer

Division of Administrative Hearings Room 530, Carlton Building Tallahassee, Florida 32304

(904) 488-9675


COPIES FURNISHED:


Dennis E. LaRosa, Esquire Staff Attorney

725 South Bronough Street Tallahassee, Florida 32304


Charles L. Curtis, Esquire

200 Southeast First Street Suite 808

Miami, Florida 33131


Docket for Case No: 78-002150
Issue Date Proceedings
Dec. 29, 1978 Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED.

Orders for Case No: 78-002150
Issue Date Document Summary
Dec. 29, 1978 Recommended Order Respondent is guilty of aiding one of its licensed customers to undercut competition by selling to it at a lower price in violation of statute. Fine of $1000.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer