Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs SUN CITY SHELL, INC., 91-004733 (1991)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 91-004733 Visitors: 24
Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Respondent: SUN CITY SHELL, INC.
Judges: K. N. AYERS
Agency: Department of Transportation
Locations: Tampa, Florida
Filed: Jul. 26, 1991
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Monday, April 27, 1992.

Latest Update: Sep. 01, 1992
Summary: Whether Respondent's trailer located on Old US 41 near Sun City in Hillsborough County, is a sign and illegal by reason of not having been permitted.Trailer parked on lot adjacent to highway with only name of owner on side is not a sign.
91-4733.PDF

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) CASE NO. 91-4733T

)

)

SUN CITY SHELL, INC., )

)

Respondent. )

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


Pursuant to notice the Division of Administrative Hearings, by it duly designated Hearing Officer, K. N. Ayers, held a formal hearing in the above styled cased on March 3, 1992, at Tampa, Florida.


APPEARANCES


For Petitioner: Charles G. Gardner, Esquire

Florida Department of Transportation Haydon Burns Building, M.S. 58

605 Suwannee Street

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0458


For Respondent: Maxwell G. Battle, Jr., Esquire

Post Office Box 1889 Dunedin, Florida 34697-1889


STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES


Whether Respondent's trailer located on Old US 41 near Sun City in Hillsborough County, is a sign and illegal by reason of not having been permitted.


PRELIMINARY STATEMENT


By notice of alleged violation dated April 29, 1991, the Department of Transportation (DOT), Petitioner, seeks to require Sun City Shell, Inc., Respondent, to remove a trailer parked along US 41 near Sun City in Hillsborough County, Florida, with the name "Sun City Shell" in large letters on both sides of the trailer. As grounds therefore, it is alleged the trailer constitutes a sign and is illegal by reason of not having been issued a permit. Respondent requested a formal hearing to challenge this alleged violation and these proceedings followed.


At the hearing Petitioner called one witness, Respondent called one witness, and eight exhibits were admitted into evidence. There is no dispute regarding the operative facts here involved; accordingly, proposed findings submitted by the parties are accepted.

Having considered all evidence presented, the following is submitted.


FINDINGS OF FACT


  1. DOT is the state agency charged with enforcing provisions of Chapter 479, Florida Statutes, relating to outdoor advertising signs.


  2. Sun City Shell, Inc., is a Florida corporation engaged in the business of digging and selling oyster shells and fill dirt.


  3. The activities of Respondent consists of mining the shells and dirt and selling to buyers who transport the material in their own vehicles.


  4. The business office of Sun City Shell is located one-half to one mile south from the location of the trailer.


  5. Respondent leases the property on which the mining is done from the owner of the land where the trailer is located. Respondent has been authorized to park tractors and trailers on this property (Exhibit 6).


  6. There is a railroad running some one-tenth of a mile away from the highway from the trailer and the mining operation takes place another one-tenth of a mile from the railroad tracks.


  7. The trailer here involved is a standard forty-foot, over-the-road trailer normally towed by a tractor and is primarily used by Respondent for the storage of tools used in the mining operation.


  8. The trailer is fully operational and has a valid current registration (Exhibit 7).


  9. The trailer has "Sun City Shell" in large letters on both sides of the trailer, but there are no arrows, address or telephone numbers, or other identification on the trailer. No application has been made by Respondent for a permit to operate and maintain an outdoor advertising sign in the location where the trailer is parked. The lettering on the trailer is clearly visible from Old US 41, which is a federal aid primary highway.


  10. Section 106 of the Hillsborough County Code (Exhibit 8) requires the name of the owner to be printed on motor vehicles used in the operation of the business. Section 320.01(1), Florida Statutes, defines "motor vehicle" to mean, inter alia, a trailer.


    CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


  11. The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over the parties to, and the subject matter of, these proceedings.


  12. The sole issue for determination is whether the trailer is a sign as defined in Section 479.01(14), Florida Statutes. If it is a sign it is in violation of Section 479.07, Florida Statutes, by reason of not having been issued a permit.


  13. Section 479.01(14) provides:


    "Sign" means any combination of structure and message in the form of an outdoor sign,

    display, device, figure, painting, drawing, message, placard, poster, billboard, advertising structure, advertisement, logo, symbol, or other form, whether placed individually or on a V-type, back-to-back, side-to-side, stacked, or double-faced display, designed, intended, or used to advertise or inform, any part of the advertising message or informative contents of which is visible from any place on the main-traveled way. The term does not include an official traffic control sign, official marker, or specific information panel erected, caused to be erected, or approved by the department.


  14. The critical portion of this definition is "designed, intended, or used to advertise or inform." The lettering on the side of the trailer is visible from the federal aid primary highway, but the trailer was not placed on this property to advertise or inform. One who was unaware of the business of Sun City Shell might well assume that was the name of a gasoline station selling Sun Petroleum products. The "sign" contained no directions or address for the operations office of the business; and actually served only to stow equipment used in the mining operation as testified by the owner of the Respondent.


  15. From the foregoing, it is concluded that the trailer visible from US

41 near Sun City in Hillsborough County is not a sign as defined in Section 479.01(14), Florida Statutes, and the notice of alleged violation should be dismissed.


RECOMMENDATION


It is RECOMMENDED that a final order be entered dismissing the notice of violation dated April 29, 1991, issued to Sun City Shell, Inc.


DONE AND ORDERED in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida, this 27 day of April 1992.



K. N. AYERS Hearing Officer

Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1550

(904) 488-9675


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 27 day of April 1992.

COPIES FURNISHED:


Charles C. Gardner, Esquire

Florida Department of Transportation Haydon Burns Building, M.S. 58

605 Suwannee Street

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0458


Maxwell G. Battle, Jr., Esquire Post Office Box 1889

Dunedin, Florida 34697-1889


Ben G. Watts Secretary

Department of Transportation Haydon Burns Building, M.S. 58 605 Suwannee Street

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0458 Attn: Eleanor F. Turner


Thornton J. Williams General Counsel

Department of Transportation Haydon Burns Building, M.S. 58 605 Suwannee Street

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0458


NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS


All parties have the right to submit written exceptions to this Recommended Order. All agencies allow each party at least 10 days in which to submit written exceptions. Some agencies allow a larger period within which to submit written exceptions. You should contact the agency that will issue the final order in this case concerning agency rules on the deadline for filing exceptions to this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will issue the final order in this case.


Docket for Case No: 91-004733
Issue Date Proceedings
Sep. 01, 1992 Docketing Statement and Notice of Appearance of Counsel filed.
Aug. 17, 1992 Notice of Appeal filed. (Agency Appeal)
Aug. 17, 1992 AGENCY APPEAL, ONCE THE RETENTION SCHEDULE OF -KEEP ONE YEAR AFTER CLOSURE- IS MET, CASE FILE IS RETURNED TO AGENCY GENERAL COUNSEL. -ac
Jul. 29, 1992 Final Order filed.
Apr. 27, 1992 Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED. Hearing held 3/3/92.
Apr. 09, 1992 Proposed Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law Recommended Order; Notice of Filing of Proposed Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Recommended Order filed.
Mar. 31, 1992 Transcript of Proceedings filed.
Mar. 25, 1992 CC Hillsborough County Ordinance NO. 88-50 w/cover ltr filed. (From Maxwell G. Battle, Jr.)
Mar. 03, 1992 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Dec. 09, 1991 Notice of Hearing sent out. (hearing set for March 3, 1992; 1:00pm; Tampa).
Nov. 26, 1991 Respondent`s Notice of Written Response to Order Cancelling Hearing and Requiring Response filed.
Oct. 18, 1991 Order Cancelling Hearing and Requiring Response sent out. (Parties` status report due Dec. 1, 1991).
Oct. 17, 1991 Motion for Continuance filed.
Aug. 21, 1991 Notice of Hearing sent out. (hearing set for Oct. 24, 1991; 9:00am; Tampa).
Aug. 14, 1991 (Petitioner) Compliance With Hearing Officer`s Initial Order filed. (From Maxwell G. Battle, Jr.)
Aug. 01, 1991 Initial Order issued.
Jul. 26, 1991 Agency referral letter; Violation; Demand for Formal Administrative Hearing filed.
May 28, 1991 Request for Stay of Notice of Violation and Intended Action by Department of Transportation; Demand for Formal Administrative Hearing filed.

Orders for Case No: 91-004733
Issue Date Document Summary
Jul. 27, 1992 Agency Final Order
Apr. 27, 1992 Recommended Order Trailer parked on lot adjacent to highway with only name of owner on side is not a sign.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer