STATE OF FLORIDA
DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND )
PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, ) DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES ) AND TOBACCO, )
)
Petitioner, )
)
vs. ) Case No. 97-1852
)
CRICKETERS ARMS, INC. d/b/a )
CRICKETERS ARMS, )
)
Respondent. )
)
RECOMMENDED ORDER
An administrative hearing was conducted in this proceeding on September 24, 1997, in Orlando, Florida, before Daniel Manry, Administrative Law Judge, Division of Administrative Hearings.
The parties, witnesses, and court reporter attended the hearing in Orlando. The undersigned participated by video conference from Tallahassee, Florida.
APPEARANCES
For Petitioner: Leslie Anderson-Adams
Assistant General Counsel Department of Business and
Professional Regulation Northwood Centre
1940 North Monroe Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1007
For Respondent: Phillip G. Coppen, pro se
Cricketers Arms, Inc.
8445 International Drive, Suite 110
Orlando, Florida 32818
STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE
The issue in this case is whether Respondent violated Sections 569.006 and 569.007, Florida Statutes (1995), by selling cigarettes to a person under 18 years of age and by failing to have the cigarette vending machine in the line of sight, and, if so, what, if any, penalty should be imposed pursuant to Florida Administrative Rule 61A-2.022, 2/
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
Petitioner filed an Administrative Action against Respondent on August 8, 1996. Respondent timely requested an administrative hearing.
At the hearing, Petitioner presented the testimony of four witnesses and submitted four exhibits for admission in evidence. Respondent called one witness and submitted three exhibits for admission in evidence.
The identity of the witnesses and exhibits, and the rulings regarding each, are set forth in the record of the hearing.
Neither party requested a transcript of the hearing. Petitioner timely filed its proposed recommended order ("PRO") on October 6, 1997. Respondent did not file a PRO.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Petitioner is the state agency responsible for regulating the sale of retail tobacco products. Respondent holds retail tobacco products permit number 58-05704T.
The licensed premises are located at 8445 International Drive, Orlando, Florida (the "licensed premises"). Respondent
operates the licensed premises for the sale of liquor at tables and a bar.
On August 7, 1996, special agents Walter Russell and Linda Greenlee initiated a routine tobacco compliance investigation of the licensed premises. Agents Russell and Greenlee directed investigative aide Megan Holbrook, age 15, to enter the licensed premises and attempt to buy cigarettes from the vending machine.
Ms. Holbrook and agents Russell and Greenlee entered the licensed premises at approximately 3:30 p.m. The cigarette vending machine was located just inside the doorway of the licensed premises.
Agents Russell and Greenlee sat at the bar. Ms. Holbrook inserted the necessary amounts into the vending machine and purchased one package of Winston cigarettes.
None of Respondent's employees questioned Ms. Holbrook concerning her age or identification. Approximately three employees were engaged in a conversation behind the bar during the time that Ms. Holbrook purchased the cigarettes. No patrons were present at the time except Ms. Holbrook and agents Russell and Greenlee.
The cigarette vending machine was positioned so that a person standing behind the bar could not see the face of anyone purchasing cigarettes unless the purchaser was at least six feet tall. A view of the purchaser is obstructed by beams and shelves.
The vending machine is approximately five feet tall. It is not in the direct line of sight of an employee who is responsible for monitoring the purchase of cigarettes.
Ms. Holbrook and agents Russell and Greenlee exited the premises after the purchase. Ms. Holbrook turned over the cigarettes to agents Russell and Greenlee.
Agents Russell and Greenlee returned inside the premises. They advised the employees inside that an unlawful sale of cigarettes had occurred and served the required documents.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over the subject matter and parties. The parties were duly noticed for the administrative hearing.
Petitioner has the burden of proof in this proceeding. Petitioner must show by clear and convincing evidence that
Respondent committed the acts alleged in the Administrative Action and the reasonableness of any penalty to be imposed. Ferris v. Turlington, 510 So. 2d 292 (Fla. 1987). Petitioner satisfied its burden of proof.
Respondent violated Section 569.06 by allowing a person under 18 years of age to purchase tobacco products from a vending machine located on the licensed premises. Respondent violated Section 569.07 by failing to locate the cigarette vending machine within the unobstructed line of sight of an employee who is
responsible for preventing persons under 18 years of age from purchasing tobacco products.
Rule 61A-2.022 authorizes Petitioner to impose a fine up to $1,000 for the violations committed by Respondent. Petitioner seeks a fine of $750.
Based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is
RECOMMENDED that Petitioner enter a Final Order finding Respondent guilty of violating Sections 569.06 and 569.07 and imposing a fine of $750.
DONE AND ENTERED this 18th day of November, 1997, in Tallahassee, Florida.
DANIEL MANRY
Administrative Law Judge
Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building
1230 Apalachee Parkway
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060
(904) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675
Fax Filing (904) 921-6847
Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 18th day of November, 1997.
ENDNOTES
1/ All references to chapters and sections are to Florida Statutes (1995) unless otherwise stated.
2/ Unless otherwise stated, all references to rules are to rules promulgated in the Florida Administrative Code in effect as of the date of this Recommended Order.
COPIES FURNISHED:
Richard Boyd, Director Department of Business and
Professional Regulation
Division of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco Northwood Centre
1940 North Monroe Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0792
Lynda Goodgame General Counsel
Department of Business and Professional Regulation
Northwood Centre
1940 North Monroe Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0792
Leslie Anderson-Adams Assistant General Counsel Department of Business and
Professional Regulation Northwood Centre
1940 North Monroe Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1007
Phillip G. Coppen, pro se Cricketers Arms, Inc.
8445 International Drive, Suite 110
Orlando, Florida 32818
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS
All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within 15 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will issue the final order in this case.
Issue Date | Proceedings |
---|---|
Jan. 02, 1998 | Final Order filed. |
Nov. 18, 1997 | Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED. Hearing held 09/24/97. |
Oct. 06, 1997 | (Petitioner) Notice of Filing Exhibit; Exhibit filed. |
Oct. 06, 1997 | Petitioner`s Proposed Recommended Order filed. |
Sep. 29, 1997 | Exhibits filed. |
Sep. 24, 1997 | Video Hearing Held; see case file for applicable time frames. |
Sep. 23, 1997 | Letter to Judge Manry from S. Hopf Re: Enclosing copies of evidence filed. |
Jul. 15, 1997 | Order Continuing and Rescheduling Formal Hearing sent out. (hearing set for 9/24/97; 9:30am; Orlando) |
Jun. 06, 1997 | Letter to Judge Manry from P. Coppen Re: Request postponement of hearing to a later date filed. |
Jun. 02, 1997 | (Petitioner) Response to Initial Order (filed via facsimile). |
May 23, 1997 | Notice of Hearing sent out. (hearing set for 6/30/97; 9:30am; Tallahassee) |
Apr. 17, 1997 | Initial Order issued. |
Apr. 14, 1997 | Agency Refferal Letter; Administrative Action; Request Hearing Form filed. |
Issue Date | Document | Summary |
---|---|---|
Dec. 18, 1997 | Agency Final Order | |
Nov. 18, 1997 | Recommended Order | Respondent violated Sections 569.006 and 569.007, Florida Statutes, by selling cigarettes to minor and by failing to have cigarette machine in line of sight and should be fined $750. |