Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

EVERETT S. RICE, PINELLAS COUNTY SHERIFF vs JILL A. SCHNEDLER, 97-005737 (1997)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 97-005737 Visitors: 13
Petitioner: EVERETT S. RICE, PINELLAS COUNTY SHERIFF
Respondent: JILL A. SCHNEDLER
Judges: CAROLYN S. HOLIFIELD
Agency: Contract Hearings
Locations: Largo, Florida
Filed: Dec. 05, 1997
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Thursday, May 28, 1998.

Latest Update: Jul. 02, 1998
Summary: THIS CAUSE came on for consideration of Petitioner's Motion for Summary Final Order (Motion) filed pursuant to Rule 60Q- 2.030, Florida Administrative Code. In the Motion, Petitioner asserts that there is currently no disputed issue of material fact. After the Motion was filed, the final hearing scheduled for March 26, 1998, was canceled and an Order to Show Cause was issued. In the Order to Show Cause, entered March 13, 1998, Respondent was required to show cause in writing, within fifteen days
More
97-5737.PDF

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


EVERETT S. RICE, Sheriff of ) Pinellas County, Florida, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) Case No. 97-5737

)

JILL A. SCHNEDLER, )

)

Respondent. )

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER OF DISMISSAL


THIS CAUSE came on for consideration of Petitioner's Motion for Summary Final Order (Motion) filed pursuant to Rule 60Q- 2.030, Florida Administrative Code. In the Motion, Petitioner asserts that there is currently no disputed issue of material fact. After the Motion was filed, the final hearing scheduled for March 26, 1998, was canceled and an Order to Show Cause was issued. In the Order to Show Cause, entered March 13, 1998, Respondent was required to show cause in writing, within fifteen days, why a recommended order of dismissal should not be entered. The Order stated that failure to respond "shall be deemed waiver of further administrative proceedings."

Respondent did not respond to the Order to Show Cause or to Petitioner's Motion for Summary Order.

Based on a review of the entire record in this cause, it is found that:

  1. Respondent is a classified employee of the Pinellas County Sheriff's Office where she works as a radio operator.

  2. On September 13, 1997, Respondent "willingly and wantonly" disobeyed a lawful order to read and sign a counseling form.

  3. After Respondent refused to sign the counseling form, the matter was investigated by the Pinellas County Sheriff's Office and a determination was made that Respondent violated Rule C-1,V, A, (023) of the Pinellas County Sheriff's Office, relating to insubordination. It was further determined that this action constituted conduct proscribed by Pinellas County Sheriff's Office Civil Service Act, Chapter 89-404, Laws of Florida, as amended by Chapter 90-395, Laws of Florida, in that it violated rules of the Pinellas County Sheriff's Office and was conduct unbecoming a public servant.

  4. The rule which Respondent violated is a Level Five Violation and, based on the prescribed point system resulted in a cumulative point total of fifty (50). The discipline range for this point total is from a five-day suspension to termination.

  5. Respondent received the minimum penalty of a five-day suspension for the violation. This penalty is consistent with the progressive discipline procedures required by the policies of the Pinellas County Sheriff's Office.

  6. Respondent challenged the suspension and timely requested a review by the Civil Service Board. In the request, Respondent did not dispute the allegations related to the specified violations.

  7. On October 8, 1997, as part of the Sheriff's Office investigation, Respondent gave a sworn statement. In her sworn statement, Respondent admitted that she had an obligation to sign the counseling form and was told to sign the form. Nonetheless, Respondent acknowledged in the sworn statement that she refused to sign the counseling form.

  8. Here Respondent has admitted that she is guilty of the conduct alleged. Moreover, the penalty imposed by Petitioner is not only within the prescribed range, but the minimum penalty that can be imposed for such a violation. Given Respondent's admission and the imposition of a penalty that is within the range for such a violation, there is no genuine issue as to any material fact.

Based upon the foregoing, including the Respondent's failure to respond to Petitioner's Motion for Summary Order and to the Order to Show Cause, it is

ORDERED that the file of the Division of Administrative Hearings is CLOSED, and

RECOMMENDED that the Pinellas County Sheriff's Office Civil Service Board enter a final order dismissing the Respondent's appeal and upholding her five-day suspension.

DONE AND ENTERED this 28th day of May, 1998, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.


CAROLYN S. HOLIFIELD

Administrative Law Judge

Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675

Fax Filing (850) 921-6847


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 28th day of May, 1998.

COPIES FURNISHED:


B. Norris Rickey Assistant County Attorney

Pinellas County Attorney’s Office

315 Court Street Clearwater, Florida 34616


Jill Schnedler

1025 Philippe Parkway Post Office Box 752

Safety Harbor, Florida 34695


Willaim Repper, Chairperson Pinellas County Sheriff's

Civil Service Board Post Office Box 539

Clearwater, Florida 34617


Leonard J. Diezen, III, Esquire Powers, Quaschnick, Tischler & Evans Post Office Box 12186

Tallahassee, Florida 32317-2186


NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS


All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within 15 days from the date of this recommended order. Any exceptions to this recommended order should be filed with the agency that will issue the final order in this case.


Docket for Case No: 97-005737
Issue Date Proceedings
Jul. 02, 1998 Letter to J. Schnedler & CC: Parties of Record from Judge Holifield (re: appeal; case jurisdiction) sent out.
Jul. 01, 1998 Final Order filed.
Jun. 22, 1998 Letter to CSH from J. Schnedler (RE: request to appeal denial) filed.
May 28, 1998 Recommended Order (hearing held , 2013). CASE CLOSED.
May 28, 1998 Recommended Order of Dismissal sent out. CASE CLOSED.
Mar. 13, 1998 Order to Show Cause and Continuing the Final Hearing sent out. (3/26/98 hearing cancelled; respondent to respond within 15 days as to why a recommended order of dismissal should not be issued)
Mar. 03, 1998 Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum filed.
Feb. 18, 1998 Petitioner`s Witness List filed.
Feb. 17, 1998 (Petitioner) Notice of Filing; Affidavit of Captain Dan Wiggins filed.
Feb. 06, 1998 Petitioner`s Motion for Summary Final Order; Petitioner`s Proposed Recommended Final Order filed.
Jan. 12, 1998 Joint Response to Initial Order filed.
Jan. 05, 1998 Order of Prehearing Instructions sent out.
Jan. 05, 1998 Notice of Hearing sent out. (hearing set for 3/26/98; 10:00am; Largo)
Dec. 11, 1997 Initial Order issued.
Dec. 05, 1997 Agency Referral Letter; Notice Of Appeal Request For Civil Service Board Review; Agency Action Letter filed.

Orders for Case No: 97-005737
Issue Date Document Summary
Jun. 30, 1998 Agency Final Order
May 28, 1998 Recommended Order Where Respondent admitted violating the rule alleged and the penalty imposed was not only within the prescribed range, but the minimum penalty for such violation, there is no genuine issue as to any material fact.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer