STATE OF FLORIDA
DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND )
EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, )
)
Petitioner, )
)
vs. ) Case No. 98-1768
)
JEFFERSON JOHNSON, )
)
Respondent. )
)
RECOMMENDED ORDER
Pursuant to notice, the Division of Administrative Hearings, by its duly designated Administrative Law Judge, Mary Clark, held a formal hearing in the above-styled case by videoconference on August 12, 1998. The judge presided from Tallahassee, Florida; the remote video site was in Orlando, Florida.
APPEARANCES
For Petitioner: Jefferson W. Johnson, pro se
4416 South Lake
Orlando, Florida 32808
For Respondent: Michael A. Greif, Esquire
Department of Labor and Employment Security
307 Hartman Building
2012 Capital Circle, Southeast Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2189
STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE
The issue for determination is whether Mr. Johnson is eligible for vocational rehabilitation services or whether, as proposed by the agency, his file should be closed.
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
In a letter dated March 4, 1998, Vocational Rehabilitation counselor, Melissa Kirkland, informed Petitioner Jefferson Johnson that his file was being closed. Mr. Johnson requested a fair hearing and the case was referred to the Division of Administrative Hearings for a hearing pursuant to Chapter 120, Florida Statutes.
At the hearing Mr. Johnson testified in his own behalf and submitted two Exhibits, both received into evidence:
Petitioner's Exhibit A is a Division of Vocational Rehabilitation agreement of understanding; Petitioner's Exhibit B is a prior notification of closure dated September 24, 1996.
The Division of Vocational Rehabilitation presented the testimony of Melissa Kirkland and two Exhibits which were received in evidence: Respondent's composite Exhibit no. 1 is a packet of physician's office notes; Exhibit no. 2 is an individual rehabilitation plan.
The transcript was not filed but Petitioner submitted a "Motion for Determination in Accordance with Proposed Recommended Order" and Respondent filed a Proposed Recommended Order.
Respondent's Motion to strike Petitioner's pleading is DENIED, as unnecessary.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Jefferson Johnson applied for services from the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation (agency) and on November 13, 1997, executed an "Agreement of Understanding" describing eligibility criteria and various client rights and responsibilities.
More specifically, the agreement provides, in pertinent part:
ELIGIBILITY
The Division of Vocational Rehabilitation (DVR) provides employment-related services to those persons who are eligible.
To be eligible:
You must have a physical, mental or emotional impairment that interferes with employment.
It must be determined that Vocational Rehabilitation (VR) services will benefit you in becoming employed or in keeping your job.
You must require VR services to become or remain employed.
YOUR RIGHTS
You have the right to:
an evaluation to determine if you are eligible for services;
written notice if you are determined to be ineligible for services;
appeal any decision concerning denial, provision, delivery, or change of service;
participate fully in all decisions. YOUR RESPONSIBILITIES
It is very important that you participate in decisions about your employment.
Your responsibilities are to:
Keep appointments or request in advance that they be changed;
participate actively in the planning of your individualized Written Rehabilitation Program (IWRP);
cooperate with your counselor in all parts of your rehabilitation;
provide all available medical information related to your rehabilitation program.
(Petitioner's Exhibit A)
There is no dispute that Petitioner has an impairment that interferes with employment.
Melissa Kirkland has a Master's degree in counseling and is experienced in working with individuals with mental and emotional impairments. She was assigned Mr. Johnson's case and reviewed his medical records. She also began working with him on developing an assessment of his work-readiness.
Mr. Johnson, who has some paralegal training from Rollins College, desires placement in a legal office that does advocacy for disabled persons. He feels that a lawyer should be able to evaluate his work-readiness.
Based on Mr. Johnson's interactions with her and on her review of his medical records, Ms. Kirkland recognizes in her client certain problems common to persons with mental health impairments: hostile or confrontational interactions with others, difficulty concentrating, punctuality problems, and lack of appropriate hygiene. Work-readiness requires that those problems be remediated.
The remediation cannot be accomplished in a regular job placement but requires the intervention and involvement of
skilled counselors and staff. Those counselors are available though the Seminole County Mental Health Center's "job store," a sheltered workshop setting that would provide evaluation and skills training that Mr. Johnson needs before he can benefit from the agency's placement services. The skills that he needs are not related to substantive knowledge in his chosen field or career, but rather are the more basic skills that would enable him to get to work on time, properly groomed, and able to get along with the supervisors and co-workers.
The "job store" is the only resource available in
Mr. Johnson's geographical area that can provide the assessment and training he needs to become work ready and able to benefit from further vocational rehabilitation services. Mr. Johnson, however, refuses to sign the individualized written rehabilitation plan prepared by Ms. Kirkland and he refuses to participate in the job store even for the few months that Ms.
Kirkland recommends.
It is this refusal to obtain essential services, and not his profanity over the telephone and in the agency office, that caused Ms. Kirkland to appropriately terminate the agency's services to Mr. Johnson.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction in this proceeding pursuant to Sections 120.569, 120.57(1), and 413.30(6), Florida Statutes.
Section 413.30(1), Florida Statutes, provides that an individual is eligible for services if he or she has a disability and requires vocational rehabilitation services to prepare for, enter, and engage in, or retain gainful employment. Section
413.30 further requires the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation to conduct assessments and evaluations to determine whether an individual may benefit from services and what services are needed.
The assessment and evaluations require some level of cooperation and participation by the client. In this case that cooperation and participation has been refused.
Whether Mr. Jefferson, as applicant, or the agency has the burden of proof (see Section 413.30(3), Florida Statutes, regarding "clear and convincing evidence" by the Division) is immaterial in this case. The evidence is clear and convincing that Mr. Jefferson's case is properly terminated until he is willing to participate in the necessary evaluation for services.
Based on the foregoing, it is hereby RECOMMENDED:
that the agency enter its final order terminating services to Petitioner without prejudice to his right to reapply.
DONE AND ENTERED this 2nd day of November, 1998, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.
MARY CLARK
Administrative Law Judge
Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building
1230 Apalachee Parkway
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060
(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675
Fax Filing (850) 921-6847
Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 2nd day of November, 1998.
COPIES FURNISHED:
Michael A. Greif, Senior Attorney Department of Labor and
Employment Security
307 Hartman Building 2012 Capital Circle
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2189
Jefferson W. Johnson
4416 South Lake Orlando Parkway Orlando, Florida 32808
Douglas I. Jamerson, Secretary Department of Labor and
Employment Security
303 Hartman Building
2012 Capital Circle, Southeast Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2152
Edward A. Dion, General Counsel Department of Labor and
Employment Security
307 Hartman Building
2012 Capital Circle, Southeast Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2152
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS
All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within 15 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will issue the final order in this case.
Issue Date | Proceedings |
---|---|
Dec. 02, 1998 | Final Order filed. |
Nov. 02, 1998 | Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED. Hearing held 08/12/98. |
Oct. 06, 1998 | Notice of Ex Parte Communication sent out. (re: information filed. at DOAH on 9/28/98) |
Oct. 06, 1998 | (Respondent) Motion to Strike (filed via facsimile). |
Oct. 05, 1998 | (Petitioner) Notice of Filing; Proposed Recommended Order filed. |
Sep. 28, 1998 | (Respondent) Motion for Determination in Accordance With Proposed Recommended Order (filed via facsimile). |
Sep. 08, 1998 | (Respondent) Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to File Proposed Recommended Order (filed via facsimile). |
Aug. 17, 1998 | Exhibits filed. |
Aug. 12, 1998 | Video Hearing Held; see case file for applicable time frames. |
Aug. 10, 1998 | (M. Grief) Prehearing Statement filed. |
Aug. 10, 1998 | Motion for Videotaping of Hearing (filed via facsimile). |
Aug. 10, 1998 | Petitioner`s Responses to Expedited Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction, or in the Alternative, for Continuance (filed via facsimile). |
Aug. 10, 1998 | Petitioner`s Request for Declaratory Statement from Agency (filed via facsimile). |
Aug. 06, 1998 | (Respondent) Expedited Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction or, in the Alternative for Continuance filed. |
Jul. 24, 1998 | Order sent out. (unopposed motion for continuance is denied; prehearing conference will be 8/7/98; prehearing statement due 8/10/98) |
Jul. 22, 1998 | (Respondent) Unopposed Motion for Continuance filed. |
Jul. 02, 1998 | (Respondent) Notice of Remailing of Discovery, Withdrawal of Motion to Compel filed. |
Jun. 24, 1998 | (Respondent) Motion to Compel filed. |
May 22, 1998 | Notice of Video Hearing sent out. (Video Final Hearing set for 8/12/98; 2:00 pm; Orlando & Tallahassee) |
May 22, 1998 | Order for Prehearing Conference sent out. |
May 04, 1998 | State of Florida, Department of Labor and Employment Security, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation`s Notice of Service of Interrogatories filed. |
May 04, 1998 | State of Florida, Department of Labor and Employment Security, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation`s First Request for Production of Documents to Petitioner filed. |
Apr. 21, 1998 | Initial Order issued. |
Apr. 14, 1998 | Agency Referral Letter; Petition For Fair Hearing; Agency Action Letter (filed via facsimile). |
Issue Date | Document | Summary |
---|---|---|
Nov. 02, 1998 | DOAH Final Order | Client with an impairment who refused to cooperate in the evaluation and job-readiness training process cannot be provided vocational rehabilitation services and file should be closed. |
MARILYN MCFADDEN vs. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, 98-001768 (1998)
WILLIAM W. ENGLERT, JR. vs. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, 98-001768 (1998)
APRIL DAWM RHODES vs. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, 98-001768 (1998)
WARREN BERGMAN vs. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, 98-001768 (1998)
KARSEN SPRADLIN vs FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, 98-001768 (1998)