Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH vs MICHAEL J. JEDWARE, 98-002010 (1998)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 98-002010 Visitors: 17
Petitioner: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
Respondent: MICHAEL J. JEDWARE
Judges: CHARLES C. ADAMS
Agency: Department of Health
Locations: Deland, Florida
Filed: Apr. 30, 1998
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Thursday, September 24, 1998.

Latest Update: Jan. 19, 1999
Summary: Should Respondent be fined $500.00 for initiating repairs to an on-site sewage treatment and disposal system before obtaining a permit?Septic tank contractor commenced repairs before obtaining a permit and was subject to $500.00 fine.
98-2010.PDF

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) Case No. 98-2010

)

MICHAEL J. JEDWARE, )

)

Respondent. )

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


Notice was provided and on September 10, 1998, a formal hearing was held in this case. Authority for conducting the hearing is set forth in Sections 120.569 and 120.57(1), Florida Statutes. The hearing location was the Volusia County Courthouse, Grand Jury Room, 120 West Indiana, Deland, Florida. The hearing was conducted by Charles C. Adams, Administrative Law Judge.

APPEARANCES


For Petitioner: Charlene Petersen, Esquire

Department of Health

420 Fentress Boulevard Daytona Beach, Florida 32114


For Respondent: Michael J. Jedware, pro se

Post Office Box 390073 Deltona, Florida 32739-0073


STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE

Should Respondent be fined $500.00 for initiating repairs to an on-site sewage treatment and disposal system before obtaining a permit?

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT


In accordance with Section 381.065, Florida Statutes, and Chapter 64E-6, Florida Administrative Code, Petitioner cited Respondent for the aforementioned alleged violation. The citation was made on March 31, 1998. On April 10, 1998, Respondent requested an administrative hearing to contest material facts associated with the alleged violation. On April 30, 1998, the case was received by the Division of

Administrative Hearings for the assignment of an administrative law judge to conduct a formal hearing. The case was initially assigned to Stephen F. Dean, Administrative Law Judge. The case was reassigned for purposes of the hearing.

At hearing, the Petitioner presented the testimony of William Vander Lugt and James McRae. Petitioner's Exhibits 1 and 2 were admitted. Respondent presented the testimony of Andy Trapp. Respondent's Exhibits 1 through 4 were admitted.

Petitioner's counsel requested that official recognition be made of Section 381.065, Florida Statutes; Chapter 489, Part III, Florida Statutes; and Rules 64E-6.003, 64E-6.015, and 64E-6.022, Florida Administrative Code. That request was granted.

No hearing transcript was prepared. The parties were granted through September 21, 1998, to present proposed recommended orders. Petitioner filed a proposed recommended order which has been considered. Respondent did not submit a proposed recommended order.



FINDINGS OF FACT


  1. Respondent is engaged in the septic tank contracting business as a contractor licensed under Chapter 489, Part III, Florida Statutes. He does business as "Alpha."

  2. In association with his business Respondent provided services to residents at 224 North Orange Avenue, Orange City, Florida. This was related to a failed on-site sewage treatment and disposal system at that residence.

  3. To assist in providing repair service to the residence in Orange City, Florida, Respondent engaged Andy Trapp.

    Mr. Trapp's business is to assist septic tank contractors in obtaining necessary permits to perform septic tank contracting services. Mr. Trapp's occupation includes field work involving soil testing, measurements, and completion of necessary paperwork to assist the septic tank contractor in obtaining necessary permits.

  4. As permitting agency, usually Petitioner would accept applications submitted by Mr. Trapp in relation to the application for a permit to repair on-site sewage treatment and disposal systems, in that Mr. Trapp is recognized by Petitioner as being sufficiently qualified to submit information in support of an application for permit.

  5. On March 27, 1998, Mr. Trapp submitted an application for a permit to repair the on-site sewage treatment and disposal system at the Orange City, Florida, address, to include supporting information concerning the results of soil testing. That application was accompanied by the necessary fee to obtain a permit. The application was delivered to Petitioner's Daytona Beach, Florida, office as a matter of convenience to Mr. Trapp. Mr. Trapp realized that the actual processing of the permit application would be conducted by Petitioner's Deland, Florida, office. In that connection, Mr. Trapp realized that the application that he had submitted to the Daytona Beach office would be forwarded by interoffice transmittal to the Deland office, which would cause a delay in the processing of the application. In his experience Mr. Trapp has filed applications with the Daytona Beach office to be subsequently transmitted to the New Smyrna Beach office of the Petitioner, which ordinarily can be done late on the same day that the application was presented or by the next day.

  6. James McRae is an environmental supervisor for the Volusia Health Department, Environmental Health Office in Deland, Florida. It is his office that had ultimate responsibility for considering, and if appropriate, issuing a permit allowing Respondent to conduct necessary repairs of the failed on-site sewage treatment and disposal system at the Orange City, Florida address. Mr. McRae confirmed that the permit application, as

    submitted by Mr. Trapp for the repairs, had been received by the Deland office on March 30, 1998. In addition, the accompanying

    $57.00 fee had been transferred from the Daytona Beach office to the Deland office, as was customary, the custom being that the funds in support of an application would ultimately be received in the office from which the application would be processed and a


    permit number assigned, as applicable. Upon receipt of the application in the Deland office, a receipt was generated. Information concerning the permit application was placed in the computer. Assessment of the application was assigned to William Vander Lugt, Environmental Specialists II, who is part of the field staff for the Petitioner's Deland office.

  7. Beyond Mr. Vander Lugt's assignment to consider the application for the permit for the Orange City, Florida project, it was expected that he would do any necessary field work involving an inspection and any necessary soil analysis. If satisfied that the site was appropriate to effect repairs to the failed on-site sewage treatment and disposal system,

    Mr. Vander Lugt would issue a permit subject to approval by Mr. McRae.

  8. Mr. McRae identified that the usual turn around time for issuing permits is two to three days, assuming that the permit was applied for at Petitioner's office which would be responsible for assessing the application. In this instance the permit had

    been applied for at another office which delayed consideration of the permit application by the Deland office. The permit was approved on April 2, 1998, within three days of its receipt by the Deland office.

  9. Before the permit was issued, Respondent, through his employees, had commenced the repairs at the Orange City, Florida, address. The commencement of repairs was verified by an on-site inspection performed by Mr. Vander Lugt, on March 31, 1998.


    Although the supporting information presented by Mr. Trapp was in order and the fee had been paid, and there was no indication that any other problems existed which would prohibit the repairs from being conducted, Respondent was premature in commencing the work before the permit issued, and was unjustified in that choice.

    CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


  10. The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over the subject matter and the parties to this case consistent with Sections 120.569 and 120.57(1), Florida Statutes.

  11. Petitioner seeks to impose a $500.00 fine against Respondent for violation of Rule 64E-6.022(1)(b), Florida Administrative Code, for initiating work to repair the on-site sewage treatment and disposal system at the Orange City, Florida address, before a permit had been issued by Petitioner. To impose the fine, Petitioner must prove the violation by a preponderance of the evidence.

  12. Respondent is a septic tank contractor licensed in accordance with Chapter 489, Part III, Florida Statutes. As such, Respondent is subject to the prohibition against initiating repairs of the system without a permit.

  13. Moreover Rule 64E-6.015, Florida Administrative Code, makes it necessary to notify and obtain an approval from the Petitioner through the county health department having jurisdiction over the system before effecting repairs. That request from the appropriate health department can be made either directly by the property owner, or lessee, or through an agent. In this instance the request was made by an agent.

  14. The expectation is that the department shall make every effort to issue the permit within two working days after receiving an application for the system repair. This is in accordance with Rule 64E-6.015(5), Florida Administrative Code. That intention is aspirational. The failure to comply with that expectation does not automatically grant a permit to the applicant, nor allow the septic tank contractor to proceed without obtaining a permit.

  15. Finally, Rule 64E-6.003(1), Florida Administrative Code, makes it necessary to obtain an on-site sewage treatment and disposal system construction permit before repairing any portion of an on-site sewage treatment and disposal system.

  16. Petitioner has shown that necessary approval and issuance of an on-site sewage treatment and disposal system

construction permit was not obtained for the repairs at the Orange City, Florida address before Respondent proceeded with the repairs. This constituted a violation of Rule 64E-6.022(1)(b), Florida Administrative Code, and subjects the Respondent to a

$500.00, fine for this first violation.


RECOMMENDATION


Upon consideration of the facts found and conclusions of law reached, it is

RECOMMENDED:


That a final order be issued which imposes a $500.00 fine against Respondent for initiating a repair of an on-site sewage treatment and disposal system without first obtaining a permit to do the work.

DONE AND ENTERED this 24th day of September, 1998, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.


CHARLES C. ADAMS

Administrative Law Judge

Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675

Fax Filing (850) 921-6847


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 24th day of September, 1998.



COPIES FURNISHED:


Charlene Petersen, Esquire Department of Health

420 Fentress Boulevard Daytona Beach, Florida 32114


Michael J. Jedware Post Office Box 390073

Deltona, Florida 32739-0073


Angela T. Hall, Agency Clerk Department of Health

2020 Capital Circle, Southeast Bin A02

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1703


NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS


All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within

15 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will issue the Final Order in this case.


Docket for Case No: 98-002010
Issue Date Proceedings
Jan. 19, 1999 Agency Final Order rec`d
Sep. 24, 1998 Recommended Order sent out. CASE CLOSED. Hearing held 9/10/98.
Sep. 21, 1998 Petitioner`s Proposed Recommended Order (filed via facsimile).
Sep. 10, 1998 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Sep. 01, 1998 Re-Notice of Hearing sent out. (hearing set for 9/10/98; 2:00pm; Deland)
May 28, 1998 Notice of Hearing and Order sent out. (hearing set for 9/10/98; 10:15am; Deland)
May 18, 1998 Joint Response to Initial Order filed.
May 06, 1998 Initial Order issued.
Apr. 30, 1998 Notice; Request for Administrative Hearing form; Agency Action Letter filed.

Orders for Case No: 98-002010
Issue Date Document Summary
Dec. 29, 1998 Agency Final Order
Sep. 24, 1998 Recommended Order Septic tank contractor commenced repairs before obtaining a permit and was subject to $500.00 fine.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer