Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DANNY FOSTER vs THE SALVATION ARMY, 02-002747 (2002)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 02-002747 Visitors: 21
Petitioner: DANNY FOSTER
Respondent: THE SALVATION ARMY
Judges: CLAUDE B. ARRINGTON
Agency: Florida Commission on Human Relations
Locations: Miami, Florida
Filed: Jul. 11, 2002
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Wednesday, October 16, 2002.

Latest Update: Feb. 24, 2003
Summary: Whether Respondent committed an unlawful employment practice against Petitioner in violation of Section 760.10 et. seq., Florida Statutes, as set forth in Petitioner's Charge of Discrimination filed with the Florida Commission on Human Relations (FCHR) on October 29, 2001, and, if so, the penalties that should be imposed.Petitioner failed to appear at final hearing. There was no evidence presented that Respondent discriminated against Petitioner as alleged in the Petition for Relief.
02-2747.PDF

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


DANNY FOSTER,


Petitioner,


vs.


THE SALVATION ARMY,


Respondent.

)

)

)

)

) Case No. 02-2747

)

)

)

)

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


Pursuant to notice, this cause came on for final hearing before Claude B. Arrington, a duly-designated Administrative Law Judge of the Division of Administrative Hearings, by video teleconference between Miami and Tallahassee, Florida, on September 12, 2002.

APPEARANCES


For Petitioner: No appearance


For Respondent: John C. Seipp, Jr., Esquire

Bonnie S. Crouch, Esquire Seipp, Flick and Kissane, P.A.

2450 Sun Trust International Center

1 Southeast 3rd Avenue Miami, Florida 33131


STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE


Whether Respondent committed an unlawful employment practice against Petitioner in violation of Section 760.10 et.

seq., Florida Statutes, as set forth in Petitioner's Charge of

Discrimination filed with the Florida Commission on Human Relations (FCHR) on October 29, 2001, and, if so, the penalties that should be imposed.

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT


Petitioner alleged that Respondent discriminated against him based on his race by terminating his employment on

August 10, 2001. On July 11, 2002, the matter was referred to the Division of Administrative Hearings, and this proceeding followed. Pursuant to a Notice of Hearing entered August 7, 2002, the matter was duly scheduled for formal hearing to be held on September 12, 2002.

On August 29, 2002, Petitioner's counsel moved to withdraw as counsel for Petitioner on the ground that Petitioner had failed to cooperate with him in the preparation for the scheduled hearing. Because Petitioner's counsel could not provide an address or telephone number for Petitioner, the motion to withdraw was taken under advisement. On September 12, 2002, the cause came on for hearing as noticed. Petitioner's counsel and Respondent appeared at the scheduled hearing.

Petitioner did not appear at the final hearing and no evidence was presented by or on behalf of Petitioner. A separate order granting the motion to withdraw filed by Petitioner's counsel has been entered by the undersigned. Respondent presented a

proffer of the evidence it would have introduced had Petitioner presented a prima facie case of discrimination.

No transcript of the proceeding has been filed. Respondent filed post-hearing submittals, which have been duly-considered by the undersigned in the preparation of this Recommended Order.

FINDINGS OF FACT


  1. Petitioner presented no evidence in support of his allegation that Respondent discriminated against him.

    CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


  2. The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction of the subject matter of and the parties to this proceeding. Section 120.57(1), Florida Statutes.

  3. Section 760.10, Florida Statutes, provides that it is an unlawful employment practice for an employer:

    (1)(a) To discharge or refuse to hire any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, handicap, or marital status.


  4. Petitioner has the burden of establishing by preponderance of the evidence a prima facie case of discrimination. See Section 760.34(5), Florida Statutes. If that prima facie case is established, the defending Respondent must articulate a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for the

    action taken against Petitioner. The burden then shifts back to Petitioner to go forward with evidence to demonstrate that the offered reason is merely a pretext for unlawful discrimination. See McDonnell-Douglas Corporation v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973); Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 248 (1981); and St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks, 509 U.S. 502 (1993).

  5. Petitioner presented no evidence that would establish a prima facie case of discrimination against Respondent. Consequently, Petitioner failed to meet his burden of proof in this proceeding, and his claim of discrimination should be dismissed.

RECOMMENDATION


Based on the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of Law, it is RECOMMENDED that the Florida Commission on Human Relations enter a final order dismissing the Petition for Relief filed in this case.

DONE AND ENTERED this 16th day of October, 2002, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.


CLAUDE B. ARRINGTON

Administrative Law Judge

Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675

Fax Filing (850) 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 16th day of October, 2002.


COPIES FURNISHED:


John C. Seipp, Jr., Esquire Bonnie S. Crouch, Esquire Seipp, Flick and Kissane, P.A.

2450 Sun Trust International Center

1 Southeast 3rd Avenue Miami, Florida 33131


Brian D. Albert, Esquire

2450 Northeast Miami Gardens Drive Miami, Florida 33180


Denise Crawford, Agency Clerk Florida Commission on Human Relations 2009 Apalachee Parkway, Suite 100

Tallahassee, Florida 32301


Cecil Howard, General Counsel Florida Commission on Human Relations 2009 Apalachee Parkway, Suite 100

Tallahassee, Florida 32301

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS


All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within

15 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will issue the Final Order in this case.


Docket for Case No: 02-002747
Issue Date Proceedings
Feb. 24, 2003 Final Order filed.
Oct. 16, 2002 Recommended Order issued (hearing held September 12, 2002) CASE CLOSED.
Oct. 16, 2002 Recommended Order cover letter identifying hearing record referred to the Agency sent out.
Sep. 19, 2002 Respondent`s Memorandum of Law (filed via facsimile).
Sep. 19, 2002 Proposed Order (filed via facsimile).
Sep. 19, 2002 Post-Hearing Submittals (filed by Respondent via facsimile).
Sep. 12, 2002 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held; see case file for applicable time frames.
Sep. 06, 2002 Respondent, The Salvation Army`s, Motion to Dismiss Petitioner`s Request for Formal Administrative Hearing (filed via facsimile).
Sep. 06, 2002 The Salvation Army`s Response to Petitioner`s Notice of Withdrawal and Motion for Continuance (filed via facsimile).
Sep. 04, 2002 Employer/Respondent`s Proposed Pre-Hearing Statement (filed via facsimile).
Aug. 29, 2002 Notice of Withdrawal and Motion for Continuance (filed by Petitioner via facsimile).
Aug. 14, 2002 Letter to Official Reporting Service from D. Crawford confirming request for court reporter services (filed via facsimile).
Aug. 07, 2002 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions issued.
Aug. 07, 2002 Notice of Hearing issued (hearing set for September 12, 2002; 9:00 a.m.; Miami, FL).
Jul. 26, 2002 Notice of Compliance filed by Petitioner.
Jul. 19, 2002 Notice of Compliance filed by Respondent.
Jul. 12, 2002 Initial Order issued.
Jul. 11, 2002 Charge of Discrimination filed.
Jul. 11, 2002 Dismissal and Notice of Rights filed.
Jul. 11, 2002 Agency referral filed.

Orders for Case No: 02-002747
Issue Date Document Summary
Feb. 21, 2003 Agency Final Order
Oct. 16, 2002 Recommended Order Petitioner failed to appear at final hearing. There was no evidence presented that Respondent discriminated against Petitioner as alleged in the Petition for Relief.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer