Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

SAM JONES, D/B/A JONES FARM vs SOUTHERN HAY SALES, INC., AND OLD REPUBLIC SURETY COMPANY, 02-002925 (2002)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 02-002925 Visitors: 15
Petitioner: SAM JONES, D/B/A JONES FARM
Respondent: SOUTHERN HAY SALES, INC., AND OLD REPUBLIC SURETY COMPANY
Judges: DON W. DAVIS
Agency: Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
Locations: Jasper, Florida
Filed: Jul. 22, 2002
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Wednesday, November 6, 2002.

Latest Update: Mar. 10, 2003
Summary: The issue is whether Respondent Southern Hay Sales Inc., (Southern Hay) and its surety, Respondent Old Republic Surety Company (Old Republic), are liable for funds due to Petitioner from the sale of agricultural products.Petitioner presents evidence sufficient to prove entitlement to pay of $1,241.95 for agricultural products.
02-2925.PDF

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


SAM JONES, d/b/a JONES FARM,


Petitioner,


vs.


SOUTHERN HAY SALES, INC., AND OLD REPUBLIC SURETY COMPANY,


Respondents.

)

)

)

)

) Case No. 02-2925

)

)

)

)

)

)


RECOMMENDED ORDER


Administrative Law Judge Don W. Davis of the Division of Administrative Hearings (DOAH) held a Final Hearing in this case on October 8, 2002, in Jasper, Florida.

APPEARANCES


For Petitioner: Sam Jones, pro se

Route 3, Box 172

Jasper, Florida 32052


For Respondent Southern Hay

Sales, Inc.: Stephen C. Bullock, Esquire

116 Northwest Columbia Avenue Lake City, Florida 32055


For Respondent Old Republic

Surety Company: No Appearance


STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE


The issue is whether Respondent Southern Hay Sales Inc., (Southern Hay) and its surety, Respondent Old Republic Surety

Company (Old Republic), are liable for funds due to Petitioner from the sale of agricultural products.

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT


On or about June 6, 2002, Petitioner filed a complaint with the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (Department). The complaint alleged that Southern Hay or its surety, Old Republic, owed funds to Petitioner for hay purchased by Southern Hay under the provisions of the Agricultural Bond and License Law, Sections 604.15 through 604.34, Florida Statutes.

Southern Hay filed an answer on or about June 24, 2002. The answer denied the factual allegations of the complaint.

On July 19, 2002, the Department referred this matter to the Division of Administrative Hearings (DOAH). The case was transferred to Judge Don W. Davis on October 7, 2002. A Notice of Hearing issued scheduling the case for formal hearing on October 8, 2002.

At the hearing, Petitioner presented the testimony of two witnesses. Southern Hay presented the testimony of two witnesses and two exhibits. Old Republic made no appearance.

A transcript of the hearing procedure was not filed with DOAH. Southern Hay and Petitioner filed Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law which have been considered in the preparation of this Recommended Order.

FINDINGS OF FACT


  1. Petitioner is a producer of agricultural products as defined by Section 604.15(5), Florida Statutes. Petitioner produces hay on a farm owned by Petitioner near Jasper, Florida.

  2. Respondent Southern Hay is a dealer in agricultural products as defined by Section 604.15(1), Florida Statutes.

  3. Hay is a natural product of a farm and, therefore, an agricultural product as defined in Section 604.15(3), Florida Statutes.

  4. Old Republic is Southern Hay's surety.


  5. Both Petitioner and Southern Hay have participated in a business arrangement since at least 1997, whereby Petitioner grew and sold to Southern Hay varying quantities of hay. Petitioner would cut, process, and then store the hay in trailers provided by Southern Hay. Petitioner would deem Southern Hay to be indebted for a load of hay when a trailer of hay was hauled away by Southern Hay personnel.

  6. On January 16, 2002, Petitioner received a signed check from Southern Hay. While there is a dispute as to who filled out the check, resolution of that question is not relevant for purposes of this matter. Suffice it to say that Southern Hay's check number 1183 was written in the amount of $2,596.45 and dated January 16, 2002. Delivery of the check to Petitioner satisfied all outstanding invoices for payment where hay had

    been picked up, with the exception of Petitioner's invoice number 302 documenting an obligation to Petitioner from Southern Hay in the amount of $1,241.95 for hay. Southern Hay's representative maintained at final hearing that an additional check was issued on February 15, 2002, which included payment for invoice number 302. No cancelled check was presented to corroborate the testimony of Southern Hay's representative and such omission, coupled with the general demeanor of the representative, prevents the testimony of the representative, Andrew Snider, from being credited in this regard.

  7. Southern Hay and its surety, Old Republic, currently owes Petitioner for an unpaid invoice in the amount of

    $1,241.95.


    CONCLUSIONS OF LAW


  8. The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over this subject matter and the parties to this action pursuant to Sections 120.569, 120.57(1), and 604.21(6), Florida Statutes.

  9. Section 604.15, Florida Statutes, contains the following definitions in pertinent part:

    1. 'Dealer in agricultural products' means any person, whether itinerant or domiciled within this state, engaged within this state in the business of purchasing, receiving, or soliciting agricultural products from the producer or her or his agent or representative for resale or processing for

      sale; acting as an agent for such producer in the sale of agricultural products for the account of the producer on a net return basis; or acting as a negotiating broker between the producer or her or his agent or representative and the buyer.


      * * *


      (3) 'Agricultural products' means the natural products of the farm, nursery, grove, orchard, vineyard, garden, and apiary (raw or manufactured); . . .


      * * *


      (5) 'Producer' means any producer of agricultural products produced in the state.


  10. Section 604.17, Florida Statutes, requires dealers in agricultural products to have a license to engage in such business.

  11. Before dealers receive their licenses, they must deliver to the Department a surety bond or a certificate of deposit. The surety bond or certificate of deposit secures payment to producers for agricultural products sold to dealers. Section 604.20(1), Florida Statutes.

  12. Petitioner has met its burden of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Respondents are indebted to Petitioner for unpaid invoices in the amount of $1,241.95.

RECOMMENDATION


Based upon the findings of fact and conclusions of law, it is

RECOMMENDED:


That the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services enter a final order requiring Respondent Southern Hay Sales, Inc., or its surety, Respondent Old Republic Surety Company, to pay Petitioner for an unpaid invoice in the amount of $1,241.95.

DONE AND ENTERED this 6th day of November, 2002, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.

_ DON W. DAVIS

Administrative Law Judge

Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675

Fax Filing (850) 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 6th day of November, 2002.


COPIES FURNISHED:


Brenda D. Hyatt, Bureau Chief Department of Agriculture

541 East Tennessee Street India Building

Tallahassee, Florida 32308

Richard D. Tritschler, General Counsel Department of Agriculture

The Capitol, Plaza Level 10 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0810


Michael A. Jankowski

Old Republic Surety Company Post Office Box 1635 Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201


Sam Jones Jones Farm 6799 SR 6 West

Jasper, Florida 32052


Stephen C. Bullock, Esquire

116 Northwest Columbia Avenue Lake City, Florida 32055


NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS


All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within

15 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will issue the final order in this case.


Docket for Case No: 02-002925
Issue Date Proceedings
Mar. 10, 2003 Final Order filed.
Nov. 27, 2002 Exceptions to Recommended Order filed by Respondent.
Nov. 06, 2002 Recommended Order issued (hearing held October 8, 2002) CASE CLOSED.
Nov. 06, 2002 Recommended Order cover letter identifying hearing record referred to the Agency sent out.
Oct. 17, 2002 Proposed Recommended Order (filed by Respondent via facsimile).
Oct. 17, 2002 Letter to Judge Davis from S. Jones requesting that you consider the testimony, under oath. given on October 8, 2002 by S. Jones and A. Seymore filed.
Oct. 08, 2002 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held; see case file for applicable time frames.
Oct. 03, 2002 Witness List filed by Respondent.
Oct. 01, 2002 Witness List (filed by A. Snider via facsimile).
Sep. 30, 2002 Witness List filed by Petitioner.
Aug. 15, 2002 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions issued.
Aug. 15, 2002 Notice of Hearing issued (hearing set for October 8, 2002; 10:00 a.m.; Jasper, FL).
Aug. 02, 2002 Compliance with Court Order filed by A. Snider.
Jul. 29, 2002 Letter to Judge Staros from S. Jones in reply to Initial Order (filed via facsimile).
Jul. 24, 2002 Initial Order issued.
Jul. 22, 2002 Answer of Respondent filed.
Jul. 22, 2002 Producer Complaint filed.
Jul. 22, 2002 Notice of Filing of Complaints filed.
Jul. 22, 2002 Agency referral filed.

Orders for Case No: 02-002925
Issue Date Document Summary
Mar. 04, 2003 Agency Final Order
Nov. 06, 2002 Recommended Order Petitioner presents evidence sufficient to prove entitlement to pay of $1,241.95 for agricultural products.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer