STATE OF FLORIDA
DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
GALAXY POWERSPORTS, LLC, | ) | |||
d/b/a JCL INTERNATIONAL, LLC, | ) | |||
AND KITAI POWERSPORTS, INC., | ) | |||
) | ||||
Petitioners, | ) ) | Case | No. | 08-5717 |
vs. | ) ) | |||
ROAD POWER USA, LLC, | ) ) | |||
Respondent. | ) | |||
| ) |
CORRECTED RECOMMENDED ORDER
Pursuant to notice, this cause was heard by Barbara J. Staros, Administrative Law Judge with the Division of Administrative Hearings, on May 7, 2009, by video teleconference with sites in Jacksonville and in Tallahassee, Florida.
APPEARANCES
For Petitioner: No Appearance For Respondent: No appearance
STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE
The issue is whether Petitioners should be allowed to establish a new point dealership for the sale of motorcycles manufactured by Zhejiang Xingyue Vehicle Co., Ltd. (ZXYV), in Jacksonville Beach, Florida.
FINDINGS OF FACT
On October 10, 2008, the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles (Department) published a notice in the Florida Administrative Weekly. The notice advised that Galaxy Powersports, LLC d/b/a JCL International, LLC, intends to allow the establishment of Kitai Powersports, Inc., as a dealership for the sale of motorcycles manufactured by Zhejiang Xingyue Vehicle Co., Ltd. (ZXYV) at 228 North 3rd Street, Jacksonville Beach, Duval County, Florida, on or after October 3, 2008.
By letter received by the Department on October 31, 2008, Respondent, Roadpower USA LLC, opposed the establishment of the dealership selling the same products as Roadpower USA, LLC, within .5 miles from its established dealership.
On November 14, 2008, the Department referred this matter to the Division of Administrative Hearings to conduct an evidentiary hearing.
By Initial Order entered November 14, 2008, Petitioners and Respondent were required to provide certain information for the scheduling of the final hearing in this cause. None of the parties responded to the Initial Order.
A Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference was entered on December 12, 2008, scheduling this case for final hearing on May 7, 2009, at 9:00 a.m. An Order of Pre-hearing Instructions was entered that same date, which required the parties to
exchange witness lists and copies of exhibits no later than seven days prior to the final hearing. Copies of the witness lists were also required to be filed with the Division of Administrative Hearings. No witness lists have been filed.
At 9:00 a.m. on May 7, 2009, the final hearing was convened. The only persons present were the court reporter, who was at the Jacksonville site, and the undersigned, who was at the Tallahassee site.
The undersigned waited until approximately 9:25 a.m., but neither the Petitioners nor the Respondent appeared for the final hearing. The hearing was adjourned at approximately
9:30 a.m. No one on behalf of Petitioners or Respondent contacted the undersigned’s office with any explanation of their non-appearance before the hearing was adjourned, or thereafter.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The Division of Administrative Hearings has jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter of this proceeding pursuant to Sections 320.699, 120.569, and 120.57(1), Florida Statutes (2008).
Section 320.642, Florida Statutes (2008), sets forth the procedure for establishing proposed motor vehicle dealerships or permitting the relocations of such dealerships. Pursuant to this statute, the burden of proof to support a new dealership is on the Petitioners. By failing to appear and
present evidence at the final hearing, they have failed to meet their burden of proof.
Based on the forgoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is
ORDERED:
That the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles enter a final order denying Petitioners’ application for the new point dealership at issue in this case.
DONE AND ENTERED this 10th day of July, 2009, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.
S
BARBARA J. STAROS
Administrative Law Judge
Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building
1230 Apalachee Parkway
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060
(850) 488-9675 SUNCOM 278-9675
Fax Filing (850) 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us
Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 10th day of July, 2009.
COPIES FURNISHED:
Michael James Alderman, Esquire Department of Highway Safety and
Motor Vehicles
Neil Kirkman Building, Room A-432 2900 Apalachee Parkway
Tallahassee, Florida 32344
Rustin Murray
Kitai Powersports, Inc.
400 North Pimlico Street
St. Augustine, Florida 32090
Leo Su
Galaxy Powersports, LLC, d/b/a JCL International, LLC
2667 Northhaven Road
Dallas, Texas 75229
Claudio Biltoc
Kitai Powersports, Inc.
143 Belmont Drive
St. Johns, Florida 32259
Pete Biltoc
Kitai Powersports, Inc. 13887 Sea Prairie Street Jacksonville, Florida 32216
Jim Lee
Road Power USA, LLC 927 North 3rd Street
Jacksonville Beach, Florida 32250
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS
All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within
15 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will issue the Final Order in this case.
Issue Date | Proceedings |
---|---|
Jul. 23, 2009 | Final Order filed. |
Jul. 10, 2009 | Corrected Recommended Order. |
Jun. 29, 2009 | Letter to Judge Staros from J. Clark regarding an incorrect reference contained in the Recommended Order filed. |
May 19, 2009 | Recommended Order (hearing held May 7, 2009). CASE CLOSED. |
May 07, 2009 | CASE STATUS: Hearing Held. |
Dec. 12, 2008 | Order of Pre-hearing Instructions. |
Dec. 12, 2008 | Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for May 7, 2009; 9:00 a.m.; Jacksonville and Tallahassee, FL). |
Dec. 01, 2008 | Undeliverable envelope returned from the Post Office. |
Nov. 14, 2008 | Initial Order. |
Nov. 14, 2008 | Notice of Publication for a New Point Franchise Motor Vehicle Dealer filed. |
Nov. 14, 2008 | Protest of Intent to Establish Dealership filed. |
Nov. 14, 2008 | Agency referral filed. |
Issue Date | Document | Summary |
---|---|---|
Jul. 20, 2009 | Agency Final Order | |
Jul. 10, 2009 | Corrected RO | |
May 19, 2009 | Recommended Order | Petitioners did not appear and therefore did not meet their burden of proof. |