Petitioner: WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC., OF FLORIDA
Respondent: SHERRY ALLAN BUCAR AND WILLIAM PAUL FISH
Judges: J. LAWRENCE JOHNSTON
Agency: Department of Environmental Protection
Locations: Fort Myers, Florida
Filed: Jun. 11, 2009
Status: Closed
DOAH Final Order on Wednesday, September 16, 2009.
Latest Update: Aug. 11, 2010
Summary: On June 30, 2009, Sherry Allan Bucar and William Paul Fish filed a Response to Waste Management, Inc., of Florida's Motion for Attorney's Fees and Supplemental Motion for Attorney's Fees under Sections 120.569(2)(e) and 120.595(1), Florida Statutes. On July 6, 2009, Waste Management, Inc., of Florida (WMIF) filed an unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply, which was granted and extended the time to file a reply on or before July 20, 2009. On July 21, 2009, WMIF filed a Reply, which
Summary: On June 30, 2009, Sherry Allan Bucar and William Paul Fish filed a Response to Waste Management, Inc., of Florida's Motion for Attorney's Fees and Supplemental Motion for Attorney's Fees under Sections 120.569(2)(e) and 120.595(1), Florida Statutes. On July 6, 2009, Waste Management, Inc., of Florida (WMIF) filed an unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply, which was granted and extended the time to file a reply on or before July 20, 2009. On July 21, 2009, WMIF filed a Reply, which treated the Response as a motion to dismiss. On July 24, 2009, Respondents filed a Motion to Strike Petitioner's Untimely Reply. On July 27, 2009, WMIF filed a Response to the Motion to Strike Untimely Reply. WMIF's Reply was untimely, but Respondents' Motion to Strike is denied, and WMIF's Reply is being considered in determining whether WMIF's claims should be dismissed. Respondents seek dismissal of WMIF's claims on three grounds: (1) untimely filing and lack of jurisdiction; (2) Respondents' not being "non-prevailing adverse" parties; and (3) Respondents not having had an "improper purpose." The third ground involves questions of fact and is not susceptible to dismissal at this stage. Even if meritorious, the second ground for dismissal only applies to one of WMIF's two claims. The first ground for dismissal (the untimely and lack of jurisdiction argument) has merit and applies to both of WMIF's statutory claims.The claim for fees for defending the motion for fees is dismissed.
More
STATE OF FLORIDASTATE OF FLORIDA
DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC., OF | ) |
|
|
|
FLORIDA, | ) ) |
|
|
|
Petitioner, | ) |
|
|
|
| ) |
|
|
|
vs. | ) | Case | No. | 09-3151F |
| ) |
|
|
|
SHERRY ALLAN BUCAR and WILLIAM | ) |
|
|
|
PAUL FISH, | ) ) |
|
|
|
Respondents. | ) |
|
|
|
| ) |
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENT TO FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL
A Final Order of Dismissal of the Motion for Attorney's Fees and Supplemental Motion for Attorney's Fees filed by Waste Management, Inc., of Florida (WMIF) against Respondents was entered on August 7, 2009.
On August 26, 2009, while WMIF's Motion for Reconsideration of the Final Order of Dismissal was pending, Respondents filed a Motion for Attorney's Fees Against [WMIF] for filing its Motion for Attorney's Fees and Supplemental Motion for Attorney's Fees against Respondents.
On September 2, 2009, WMIF filed a Motion to Dismiss Respondents' Motion for Attorney's Fees Against [WMIF]. On September 8, 2009, Respondents filed an Opposed Request for Extension of Time to File Opposition to Petitioner's Motion to Dismiss, which stated WMIF's agreement to an extension until September 11 and its opposition to the requested extension until September 16, 2009. On September 14, 2009, Respondents filed their Response to WMIF's Motion to Dismiss.
WMIF seeks dismissal of Respondents' claims under Section 120.595(1), Florida Statutes (2009)1, on two grounds: (1) WMIF's not being a "non-prevailing adverse party" under paragraph (e)3 of the statute; and (2) WMIF not having had an "improper purpose" under paragraph (e)1 of the statute.
WMIF's first ground has merit. It is apparent from the wording of Section 120.595(1), Florida Statutes, that WMIF's Motion for Attorney's Fees and Supplemental Motion for Attorney's
Fees against Respondents did not initiate "a proceeding pursuant to s. 120.57(1)." § 120.595(1)(b), Fla. Stat. Rather, they attempted to initiate proceedings under Sections 120.569(2)(e) and 120.595(1), Florida Statutes. See also § 120.595(1)(e)1, Fla. Stat. (defining "nonprevailing adverse party" in terms that have no application to WMIF's Motion for Attorney's Fees and Supplemental Motion for Attorney's Fees against Respondents).
For this reason, WMIF's Motion to Dismiss is granted; and Respondents' Motion for Attorney's Fees Against [WMIF] is dismissed.
DONE AND ORDERED this 16th day of September, 2009, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.
S
J. LAWRENCE JOHNSTON Administrative Law Judge
Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building
1230 Apalachee Parkway
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060
(850) 488-9675
Fax Filing (850) 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us
Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 16th day of September, 2009.
ENDNOTE
1/ Unless otherwise noted, all statutory references are to the 2009 version of the Florida Statutes.
COPIES FURNISHED:
Kenneth G. Oertel, Esquire
Oertel, Fernandez, Cole & Bryant, P.A.
301 South Bronough Street Post Office Box 1110
Tallahassee, Florida 32302-1110
Charles J. Basinait, Esquire
Henderson Franklin Starnes & Holt, P.A. Post Office Box 280
Fort Myers, Florida 33902
Richard S. Annunziata, Esquire Brennan, Manna & Donaldson, P.L. 3301 Bonita Beach Road, Suite 100 Bonita Springs, Florida 34134
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO JUDICIAL REVIEW
A party who is adversely affected by this Supplement to Final Order of Dismissal is entitled to judicial review pursuant to Section 120.68, Florida Statutes. Review proceedings are governed by the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. Such proceedings are commenced by filing the original Notice of Appeal with the agency clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings and a copy, accompanied by filing fees prescribed by law, with the District Court of Appeal, First District, or with the District Court of Appeal in the Appellate District where the party resides. The notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of rendition of the order to be reviewed.
Docket for Case No: 09-003151F
Issue Date |
Proceedings |
Aug. 11, 2010 |
Transmittal letter from Claudia Llado forwarding the Depositions of Sherry Allan Bucar and William Paul Fish, to the agency.
|
Apr. 22, 2010 |
Mandate filed.
|
Apr. 06, 2010 |
Opinion filed.
|
Dec. 23, 2009 |
Index, Record, and Certificate of Record sent to the District Court of Appeal.
|
Oct. 12, 2009 |
Supplemental Index (of the Record) sent to the parties of record.
|
Oct. 12, 2009 |
Invoice for the supplemental record on appeal mailed.
|
Oct. 06, 2009 |
Directions to the Clerk filed.
|
Oct. 06, 2009 |
Index (of the Record) sent to the parties of record.
|
Oct. 06, 2009 |
Invoice for the record on appeal mailed.
|
Sep. 16, 2009 |
Supplement to Final Order of Dismissal. CASE CLOSED.
|
Sep. 14, 2009 |
Respondents, Sherry Allan Bucar and William Paul Fish's, Response to Waste Management, Inc., of Florida's Motion to Dismiss Respondents' Motion for Attorney's Fees Against Waste Management, Inc. of Florida filed.
|
Sep. 11, 2009 |
Letter to C. Llado from J. Wheeler acknowledging receipt of notice of appeal, DCA Case No. 1D09-4543 filed.
|
Sep. 10, 2009 |
Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration for Lack of Jurisdiction and Mootness.
|
Sep. 09, 2009 |
Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal sent to the First District Court of Appeal this date.
|
Sep. 08, 2009 |
Respondents' Opposed request for Extension of Time to File Opposition to Petitioner's Motion to Dismiss Respondents' Motion for Attorney's Fees filed.
|
Sep. 08, 2009 |
Notice of Appeal filed.
|
Sep. 02, 2009 |
Petitioner, Waste Management, Inc. of Florida's Reply to Respondents' Response to the Motion for Reconsideration of the Final Order of Dismissal, and Motion to Dismiss Respondent's Motion for Attorney's Fees Against Waste Management, Inc...etc.. filed.
|
Aug. 26, 2009 |
Respondents, Sherry Allan Bucar and William Paul Fish's, Joint (1) Response to Waste Management, Inc., of Florida's Motion for Reconsideration of the Final Order of Dismissal and (2) Motion for Attorney's Fees Against Waste Management, Inc. filed.
|
Aug. 14, 2009 |
Petitioner Waste Management, Inc.'s Motion for Reconsideration of the Final Order of Dismissal filed.
|
Aug. 07, 2009 |
Final Order of Dismissal. CASE CLOSED.
|
Jul. 27, 2009 |
Petitioner Waste Management Inc. of Florida's Response to Motion to Strike Untimely Reply filed.
|
Jul. 24, 2009 |
Notice of Filing (of Requests for Admissions propounded on Petitioner Waste Management, Inc., of Florida and the Department of Environmental Protection; and Responses to the Above-referenced Requests for Admissions by WMI and the DEP) filed.
|
Jul. 24, 2009 |
Motion to Strike Petitioner's Untimely Reply filed.
|
Jul. 21, 2009 |
Petitioner, Waste Management, Inc.'s, Reply to Respondents' Response to Petitioner's Motion for Attorneys' Fees filed.
|
Jul. 15, 2009 |
Notice of Filing (of depositions of W. Fish and S. Bucar) filed.
|
Jul. 08, 2009 |
Order Granting Leave to File Reply.
|
Jul. 07, 2009 |
Notice of No Objection to Petitioner's Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply filed.
|
Jul. 06, 2009 |
Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply filed.
|
Jun. 30, 2009 |
Respondents, Sherry Allen Bucar and William Paul Fish's, Response to Waste Management, Inc., of Florida's Motion for Attorney's Fees and Supplemental Motion for Attorney's Fees filed.
|
Jun. 29, 2009 |
Notice of Unavailability filed.
|
Jun. 22, 2009 |
Order Granting Extension of Time.
|
Jun. 19, 2009 |
Petitioner, Waste Management Inc. of Florida's, Supplemental Motion for Attorney's Fees filed.
|
Jun. 18, 2009 |
Stipulated Motion for Enlargment(sic) of Time for Respondents to Serve Responses to Waste Management, Inc., of Florida's Pending Motion for Attorney's Fees filed.
|
Jun. 18, 2009 |
Notice of Appearance (of R. Annunziata) filed.
|
Jun. 11, 2009 |
Notice sent out that this case is now before the Division of Administrative Hearings.
|
Jun. 11, 2009 |
Respondent, Waste Management Inc., of Florida's, Motion for Attorney's Fees filed. (FORMERLY DOAH CASE NO. 09-1559)
|
Orders for Case No: 09-003151F
Issue Date |
Document |
Summary |
Apr. 21, 2010 |
Mandate
|
|
Apr. 05, 2010 |
Opinion
|
|
Sep. 16, 2009 |
DOAH Final Order
|
The claim for fees for defending the motion for fees is dismissed.
|
Aug. 07, 2009 |
DOAH Final Order
|
No jurisdiction for Sections 120.595(1) and 120.569(2)(e) attorney's fees claims filed after jurisdiction relinquished and DOAH files are closed.
|