Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

DEBORAH BOHLER vs DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES, DIVISION OF RETIREMENT, 09-003350RX (2009)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 09-003350RX Visitors: 11
Petitioner: DEBORAH BOHLER
Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES, DIVISION OF RETIREMENT
Judges: P. MICHAEL RUFF
Agency: Department of Management Services
Locations: Jacksonville, Florida
Filed: Jun. 18, 2009
Status: Closed
DOAH Final Order on Tuesday, November 10, 2009.

Latest Update: May 17, 2011
Summary: This cause comes before the undersigned, pursuant to the petition filed by the Petitioner, Deborah Bohler, challenging the validity of Florida Administrative Code Rule 60S- 9.001(2)(s). Specifically, the dispute concerns whether the Division of Retirement's application for Service Retirement and the Deferred Retirement Program (Form DP-11) is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority for reasons set forth in Section 120.52(8)(c)-(e), Florida Statutes.Petitioner challenged Rule estab
More
STATE OF FLORIDA

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS


DEBORAH BOHLER,

)





)




Petitioner,

)





)




vs.

)

)

Case

Nos.

09-3350RX

DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT

)




SERVICES, DIVISION OF

)




RETIREMENT,

)

)




Respondent.

)





)





FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL


This cause comes before the undersigned, pursuant to the petition filed by the Petitioner, Deborah Bohler, challenging the validity of Florida Administrative Code Rule 60S- 9.001(2)(s). Specifically, the dispute concerns whether the Division of Retirement's application for Service Retirement and the Deferred Retirement Program (Form DP-11) is an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority for reasons set forth in Section 120.52(8)(c)-(e), Florida Statutes.

This Petitioner also has prosecuted a petition pursuant to Section 120.57(1) and 120.569, Florida Statutes (2009), by which she seeks to obtain retirement benefits as a surviving spouse and joint annuitant of her deceased husband, the FRS member, George S. Bohler. That case was consolidated with the subject rule challenge petition and heard together. That case has been

adjudicated before the Division of Administrative Hearings by Recommended Order, which Recommended Order determined and concluded that the Petitioner was entitled to retirement benefits as a surviving spouse and joint annuitant of her deceased husband. Consequently, her substantial interests were addressed and adjudicated in that case in her favor. Because of the result in that case, the Recommended Order determined her substantial interests. She therefore no longer has a substantial interest in challenging and overturning the subject rule. The result in the Recommended Order in the case originally numbered 09-2842 has effectively rendered the subject rule challenge moot. Consequently, being advised in the premises, it is

ORDERED that the challenge to Florida Administrative Code Rule 60S-9.001(2)(s) has been rendered moot based upon the

above-referenced determination and this case, numbered 09-3350RX is hereby dismissed without prejudice.

DONE AND ORDERED this 10th day of November, 2009, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.


S

P. MICHAEL RUFF Administrative Law Judge

Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building

1230 Apalachee Parkway

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060

(850) 488-9675

Fax Filing (850) 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us


Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 10th day of November, 2009.


COPIES FURNISHED:


Elizabeth Regina Stevens, Esquire Department of Management Services Office of the General Counsel 4050 Esplanade Way, Suite 160

Tallahassee, Florida 32327


T. A. Delegal, Esquire Delegal Law Offices, P.A.

424 East Monroe Street Jacksonville, Florida 32202


Sarabeth Snuggs, Director Division of Retirement

Department of Management Services Post Office Box 9000

Tallahassee, Florida 32315-9000


John Brenneis, General Counsel Department of Management Services 4050 Esplanade Way

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0950

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO JUDICIAL REVIEW



A party who is adversely affected by this Final Order is entitled to judicial review pursuant to Section 120.68, Florida Statutes. Review proceedings are governed by the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. Such proceedings are commenced by filing the original Notice of Appeal with the agency clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings and a copy, accompanied by filing fees prescribed by law, with the District Court of Appeal, First District, or with the District Court of Appeal in the Appellate District where the party resides. The notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of rendition of the order to be reviewed.


Docket for Case No: 09-003350RX
Issue Date Proceedings
May 17, 2011 Mandate filed.
Mar. 04, 2011 Opinion filed.
Jun. 10, 2010 Index, Record, and Certificate of Record sent to the District Court of Appeal.
May 10, 2010 Appellant's Response to Order to Show Cause filed.
Apr. 20, 2010 Motion to Reopen Formal Administrative Proceedings filed.
Apr. 12, 2010 Invoice for the record on appeal mailed.
Apr. 12, 2010 Index (of the Record) sent to the parties of record.
Feb. 22, 2010 Notice of Appeal filed and Certified copy sent to the District Court of Appeal this date.
Nov. 10, 2009 Final Order of Dismissal. CASE CLOSED.
Aug. 21, 2009 (Respondent's) Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Aug. 21, 2009 (Respondent's) Proposed Final Order filed.
Aug. 21, 2009 Petitioner's Proposed Final Order filed.
Aug. 21, 2009 Petitioner's Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Aug. 14, 2009 Letter to Judge Ruff from W. Byndloss enclosing Petitioner's Exhibits 1 and 2 (exhibits not available for viewing) filed.
Aug. 11, 2009 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Aug. 11, 2009 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Aug. 10, 2009 Notice of Filing Respondent's Answers to Petitioner's Second Set of Interrogatories filed.
Jul. 31, 2009 Joint Response to Prehearing Order filed.
Jul. 22, 2009 Petitioner's Response to Respondent's Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction filed.
Jul. 21, 2009 Respondent's Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction filed.
Jul. 20, 2009 Respondent's Response to Petitioner's First Request to Produce (filed in Case No. 09-003350RX).
Jul. 20, 2009 Respondent's Notice of Serving Answers to Interrogatories (filed in Case No. 09-003350RX).
Jul. 10, 2009 Notice of Withdrawal of Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Standing filed.
Jul. 09, 2009 Amended Petition for Formal Administrative Hearing filed.
Jul. 08, 2009 Request for Telephonic Hearing on Respondent's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Standing filed.
Jul. 07, 2009 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Standing filed.
Jun. 30, 2009 Amended Notice of Hearing (hearing set for August 11, 2009; 10:30 a.m.; Jacksonville, FL; amended as to Date of Hearing).
Jun. 30, 2009 Letter to Judge Ruff from T. Delegal advising that they have no objection to consolidation of the two cases filed.
Jun. 29, 2009 Letter to Judge Ruff from E. Stevens regarding consolidating rule challenge case filed.
Jun. 29, 2009 Order of Consolidation (DOAH Case Nos. 09-2842 and 09-3350RX).
Jun. 29, 2009 Notice of Hearing (hearing set for August 7, 2009; 9:30 a.m.; Jacksonville, FL).
Jun. 23, 2009 Notice of Service of Respondent's First Interrogatories to Petitioner filed.
Jun. 19, 2009 Order of Assignment.
Jun. 18, 2009 Petition for Formal Administrative Hearing filed.
Jun. 18, 2009 Referral Letter filed.
Jun. 18, 2009 Rule Challenge transmittal letter to Liz Cloud from Claudia Llado copying Scott Boyd and the Agency General Counsel.

Orders for Case No: 09-003350RX
Issue Date Document Summary
Mar. 21, 2011 Mandate
Mar. 03, 2011 Opinion
Nov. 10, 2009 DOAH Final Order Petitioner challenged Rule estab. form for spousal acknowledgement. Re: Option 1 retirement benefits. Consolidated case R.O. found for Petitioner and awarded benefits, the rule challenge is moot. R.O. satisfied her interests and no longer has standing.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer