STATE OF FLORIDA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS
DELORES ARCHINAL, HUD Case No. 04-12-0042-8
Petitioner, FCHR Case No. 2012H0089
v. DOAH Case No. 12-0553
SIXTH MOORINGS CONDOMINIUM FCHR Order No. 12-036 ASSOCIATION, INC.,
Respondent.
/
Preliminary Matters
Petitioner Delores Archinal filed a housing discrimination complaint pursuant to the Fair Housing Act, Sections 760.20 - 760.37, Florida Statutes (2011), alleging that Respondent Sixth Moorings Condominium Association, Inc., committed a discriminatory housing practice by failing to make a reasonable accommodation for Petitioner’s handicap.
The allegations set forth in the complaint were investigated, and, on January 25, 2012, the Executive Director issued a determination finding that there was no reasonable cause to believe that a discriminatory housing practice had occurred.
Petitioner filed a Petition for Relief from a Discriminatory Housing Practice and the case was transmitted to the Division of Administrative Hearings for the conduct of a formal proceeding.
An evidentiary hearing was held by video teleconference at sites in Miami and Tallahassee, Florida, on May 11, 2012, before Administrative Law Judge Cathy M. Sellers.
Judge Sellers issued a Recommended Order of dismissal, dated May 29, 2012.
The Commission panel designated below considered the record of this matter and determined the action to be taken on the Recommended Order.
Findings of Fact
A transcript of the proceeding before the Administrative Law Judge was not filed with the Commission. In the absence of a transcript of the proceeding before the Administrative Law Judge, the Recommended Order is the only evidence for the Commission to consider. See National Industries, Inc. v. Commission on Human
Relations, et al., 527 So. 2d 894, at 897, 898 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). Accord, Mack v. Agency for Persons with Disabilities, FCHR Order No. 11-026 (March 17, 2011), Hall v. Villages of West Oaks HOA, FCHR Order No. 08-007 (January 14, 2008), Beach- Gutierrez v. Bay Medical Center, FCHR Order No. 05-011 (January 19, 2005), and
Waaser v. Streit’s Motorsports, FCHR Order No. 04-157 (November 30, 2004).
We adopt the Administrative Law Judge’s findings of fact.
Conclusions of Law
We find the Administrative Law Judge’s application of the law to the facts to result in a correct disposition of the matter.
We adopt the Administrative Law Judge’s conclusions of law.
Exceptions
Neither of the parties filed exceptions to the Administrative Law Judge’s Recommended Order.
Dismissal
The Petition for Relief and Housing Discrimination Complaint are DISMISSED with prejudice.
The parties have the right to seek judicial review of this Order. The Commission and the appropriate District Court of Appeal must receive notice of appeal within 30 days of the date this Order is filed with the Clerk of the Commission. Explanation of the right to appeal is found in Section 120.68, Florida Statutes, and in the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.110.
DONE AND ORDERED this 17th day of July , 2012. FOR THE FLORIDA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS:
Commissioner Gilbert M. Singer, Panel Chairperson; Commissioner Onelia Fajardo; and
Commissioner Michell Long
Filed this 17th day of July , 2012, in Tallahassee, Florida.
/s/ Violet Crawford, Clerk
Commission on Human Relations 2009 Apalachee Parkway, Suite 100
Tallahassee, FL 32301
(850) 488-7082
Copies furnished to:
Delores Archinal Apartment 710
18555 Northeast 14th Street Miami, FL 33179
Delores Archinal
1301 Northeast 191st Street, F-107 Miami, FL 33179
Sixth Moorings Condominium Association, Inc. c/o Kevin Peters, Esq.
Straley & Otto, P.A.
2699 Stirling Road, Suite C-207 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33312
Cathy M. Sellers, Administrative Law Judge, DOAH James Mallue, Legal Advisor for Commission Panel
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing has been mailed to the above listed addressees this 17th day of July , 2012.
By: /s/ Clerk of the Commission
Florida Commission on Human Relations
Issue Date | Document | Summary |
---|---|---|
Jul. 17, 2012 | Agency Final Order | |
May 29, 2012 | Recommended Order | Petitioner failed to prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Respondent unlawfully discriminated against her by failing to reasonably accommodate her handicap, in violation of the Fair Housing Act. |