STATE OF FLORIDA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS
PHILLIP RILEY, EEOC Case No. 15D201200178
Petitioner, FCHR Case No. 2012-01008
v. DOAH Case No. 12-2616
LAKE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, FCHR Order No. 13-038
Respondent.
/
Preliminary Matters
Petitioner Phillip Riley filed a complaint of discrimination pursuant to the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, Sections 760.01 - 760.11, Florida Statutes (2011), alleging that Respondent Lake Correctional Institution committed unlawful employment practices on the bases of Petitioner’s race (Black) and sex (male) in the manner in which it disciplined Petitioner and by terminating Petitioner from employment.
The allegations set forth in the complaint were investigated, and, on July 12, 2012, the Executive Director issued a determination finding that there was no reasonable cause to believe that an unlawful employment practice had occurred.
Petitioner filed a Petition for Relief from an Unlawful Employment Practice, and the case was transmitted to the Division of Administrative Hearings for the conduct of a formal proceeding.
An evidentiary hearing was held by video teleconference at sites in Orlando and Tallahassee, Florida, on January 23, 2013, before Administrative Law Judge Elizabeth
W. McArthur.
Judge McArthur issued a Recommended Order of dismissal, dated February 25,
2013.
The Commission panel designated below considered the record of this matter and
determined the action to be taken on the Recommended Order.
Findings of Fact
A transcript of the proceeding before the Administrative Law Judge was not filed with the Commission. In the absence of a transcript of the proceeding before the Administrative Law Judge, the Recommended Order is the only evidence for the Commission to consider. See National Industries, Inc. v. Commission on Human Relations, et al., 527 So. 2d 894, at 897, 898 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). Accord, Gantz, et al.
v. Zion’s Hope, Inc., d/b/a Holy Land Experience, FCHR Order No. 11-048 (June 6, 2011), Mack v. Agency for Persons with Disabilities, FCHR Order No. 11-026 (March 17, 2011), Hall v. Villages of West Oaks HOA, FCHR Order No. 08-007 (January 14, 2008), Beach-Gutierrez v. Bay Medical Center, FCHR Order No. 05-011 (January 19, 2005), and Waaser v. Streit’s Motorsports, FCHR Order No. 04-157 (November 30,
2004).
We adopt the Administrative Law Judge’s findings of fact.
Conclusions of Law
We find the Administrative Law Judge’s application of the law to the facts to result in a correct disposition of the matter.
We adopt the Administrative Law Judge’s conclusions of law.
Exceptions
Neither of the parties filed exceptions to the Administrative Law Judge’s Recommended Order.
Dismissal
The Petition for Relief and Complaint of Discrimination are DISMISSED with prejudice.
The parties have the right to seek judicial review of this Order. The Commission and the appropriate District Court of Appeal must receive notice of appeal within 30 days of the date this Order is filed with the Clerk of the Commission. Explanation of the right to appeal is found in Section 120.68, Florida Statutes, and in the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.110.
DONE AND ORDERED this 8th day of May , 2013. FOR THE FLORIDA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS:
Commissioner Gilbert M. Singer, Panel Chairperson; Commissioner Michell Long; and
Commissioner Mario M. Valle
Filed this 8th day of May , 2013, in Tallahassee, Florida.
/s/ Violet Crawford, Clerk
Commission on Human Relations 2009 Apalachee Parkway, Suite 100
Tallahassee, FL 32301
(850) 488-7082
Copies furnished to:
Phillip Riley
c/o Jerry Girley, Esq. The Girley Law Firm 125 East Marks Street Orlando, FL 32803
Lake Correctional Institution c/o Todd Evan Studley, Esq.
Florida Department of Corrections 501 South Calhoun Street Tallahassee, FL 32399
Elizabeth W. McArthur, Administrative Law Judge, DOAH James Mallue, Legal Advisor for Commission Panel
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing has been mailed to the above listed addressees this 8th day of May , 2013.
By: /s/ Clerk of the Commission
Florida Commission on Human Relations
Issue Date | Document | Summary |
---|---|---|
May 08, 2013 | Agency Final Order | |
Feb. 25, 2013 | Recommended Order | Petitioner did not prove race/gender discrimination. No competent evidence was offered to prove disparate treatment theory. Though not required, Respondent proved legitimate non-discriminatory reasons for firing Petitioner while he was on probation. |