Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

JAVIER I. NEPTON vs COMPLETE COLLECTION SERVICE OF FLORIDA, 12-002955 (2012)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 12-002955 Visitors: 20
Petitioner: JAVIER I. NEPTON
Respondent: COMPLETE COLLECTION SERVICE OF FLORIDA
Judges: JESSICA E. VARN
Agency: Commissions
Locations: Lauderdale Lakes, Florida
Filed: Sep. 13, 2012
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Wednesday, December 19, 2012.

Latest Update: Mar. 11, 2013
Summary: Whether Respondent committed an unfair employment practice by discriminating against Petitioner on the basis of race, in violation of chapter 760, Florida Statutes (2012), and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.Petitioner failed to establish that he was subject to a hostile work environment, or that his termination was the result of retaliatory discharge.
TempHtml


STATE OF FLORIDA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS


JAVIER I. NEPTON, EEOC Case No. 510201201794


Petitioner, FCHR Case No. 2012-01550


v. DOAH Case No. 12-2955


COMPLETE COLLECTION SERVICE OF FCHR Order No. 13-017 FLORIDA,


Respondent.

/


FINAL ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR RELIEF FROM AN UNLAWFUL EMPLOYMENT PRACTICE


Preliminary Matters


Petitioner Javier I. Nepton filed a complaint of discrimination pursuant to the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, Sections 760.01 - 760.11, Florida Statutes (2011), alleging that Respondent Complete Collection Service of Florida committed unlawful employment practices on the basis of Petitioner’s National Origin (Hispanic) by subjecting Petitioner to a hostile work environment, and on the basis of retaliation by terminating Petitioner from employment.

The allegations set forth in the complaint were investigated, and, on August 16, 2012, the Executive Director issued a determination finding that there was no reasonable cause to believe that an unlawful employment practice had occurred.

Petitioner filed a Petition for Relief from an Unlawful Employment Practice, and the case was transmitted to the Division of Administrative Hearings for the conduct of a formal proceeding.

An evidentiary hearing was held by video teleconference at sites in Lauderdale Lakes and Tallahassee, Florida, on November 15, 2012, before Administrative Law Judge Jessica E. Varn.

Judge Varn issued a Recommended Order of dismissal, dated December 19, 2012.

The Commission panel designated below considered the record of this matter and determined the action to be taken on the Recommended Order.


Findings of Fact


A transcript of the proceeding before the Administrative Law Judge was not filed with the Commission. In the absence of a transcript of the proceeding before the


Filed March 11, 2013 2:52 PM Division of Administrative Hearings


FCHR Order No. 13-017

Page 2


Administrative Law Judge, the Recommended Order is the only evidence for the Commission to consider. See National Industries, Inc. v. Commission on Human Relations, et al., 527 So. 2d 894, at 897, 898 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). Accord, Gantz, et al.

v. Zion’s Hope, Inc., d/b/a Holy Land Experience, FCHR Order No. 11-048 (June 6, 2011), Mack v. Agency for Persons with Disabilities, FCHR Order No. 11-026 (March 17, 2011), Hall v. Villages of West Oaks HOA, FCHR Order No. 08-007 (January 14, 2008), Beach-Gutierrez v. Bay Medical Center, FCHR Order No. 05-011 (January 19, 2005), and Waaser v. Streit’s Motorsports, FCHR Order No. 04-157 (November 30, 2004).

We adopt the Administrative Law Judge’s findings of fact.


Conclusions of Law


We find the Administrative Law Judge’s application of the law to the facts to result in a correct disposition of the matter.

We adopt the Administrative Law Judge’s conclusions of law.


Exceptions


Petitioner filed exceptions to the Administrative Law Judge’s Recommended Order in a letter to the Clerk of the Commission, dated December 23, 2012, and received by the Commission on or about January 7, 2013.

There is no indication on the document that it was provided to the Respondent as is required by Fla. Admin. Code R. 28-106.104(4) and Fla. Admin. Code R. 28-106.110.

However, the Commission published the document to the Respondent, and placed the document in the record of this case, through the issuance of a notice of ex parte communication, mailed to the parties on January 15, 2013.

The exception document seems to request that Respondent be ordered to engage in mediation to resolve the case.

While the Commission has the authority to provide voluntary mediation services, the Commission does not have the authority to order the parties to participate in mediation. See Fla. Admin. Code R. 60Y-2.004(3)(e).

Petitioner’s exception is rejected.


Dismissal


The Petition for Relief and Complaint of Discrimination are DISMISSED with prejudice.

The parties have the right to seek judicial review of this Order. The Commission and the appropriate District Court of Appeal must receive notice of appeal within 30 days of the date this Order is filed with the Clerk of the Commission. Explanation of the right


FCHR Order No. 13-017

Page 3


to appeal is found in Section 120.68, Florida Statutes, and in the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.110.


DONE AND ORDERED this 11th day of March , 2013. FOR THE FLORIDA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS:


Commissioner Gilbert M. Singer, Panel Chairperson; Commissioner Onelia Fajardo-Garcia; and Commissioner Michell Long


Filed this 11th day of March , 2013, in Tallahassee, Florida.


/s/ Violet Crawford, Clerk

Commission on Human Relations 2009 Apalachee Parkway, Suite 100

Tallahassee, FL 32301

(850) 488-7082


Copies furnished to:


Javier I. Nepton Post Office Box 574

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33302


Complete Collection Service of Florida c/o Samantha Singer

4833 North Dixie Highway Fort Lauderdale, FL 33334


Jessica E. Varn, Administrative Law Judge, DOAH James Mallue, Legal Advisor for Commission Panel


FCHR Order No. 13-017

Page 4


I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing has been mailed to the above listed addressees this 11th day of March , 2013.


By: /s/ Clerk of the Commission

Florida Commission on Human Relations


Docket for Case No: 12-002955
Issue Date Proceedings
Mar. 11, 2013 Agency Final Order Dismissing Petition for Relief from an Unlawful Employment Practice filed.
Mar. 11, 2013 Agency Final Order Dismissing Petition for Relief from an Unlawful Employment Practice filed.
Dec. 19, 2012 Recommended Order (hearing held November 15, 2012). CASE CLOSED.
Dec. 19, 2012 Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
Nov. 28, 2012 Notice of Ex-parte Communication.
Nov. 26, 2012 Petitioner's Proposed Decision rtegarding the Aforementioned filed.
Nov. 15, 2012 Petitioner's Notice of Exhibit Documents to Be Presented at the November 15th , 2012 Scheduled Final Hearing, In Support off Petition for Relief Form Filed with the Division of Administrative Hearing on the Above Referenced Case filed.
Nov. 15, 2012 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Nov. 13, 2012 Petitioner's Letter Response to the Initial Order filed.
Nov. 07, 2012 (Petitioner's) Witness List filed.
Nov. 07, 2012 Letter to Judge Varn from J. Nepton in response to Initial Order filed.
Oct. 26, 2012 Petitioner's Response to Respondent's Allegations as Stated in their September 18th, 2012 Correspondence. See Copy of said Correspondence Marked for Reference as Exhibit (A) filed.
Sep. 28, 2012 Letter to Judge Varn from Javier Nepton in response to Initial Order filed.
Sep. 25, 2012 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
Sep. 25, 2012 Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for November 15, 2012; 9:00 a.m.; Lauderdale Lakes and Tallahassee, FL).
Sep. 20, 2012 Letter to DOAH from S. Singer regarding response to initial order and documents (not available for viewing) filed.
Sep. 13, 2012 Initial Order.
Sep. 13, 2012 Charge of Discrimination filed.
Sep. 13, 2012 Notice of Determination: No Cause filed.
Sep. 13, 2012 Determination: No Cause filed.
Sep. 13, 2012 Transmittal of Petition filed by the Agency.
Sep. 13, 2012 Petition for Relief filed.

Orders for Case No: 12-002955
Issue Date Document Summary
Mar. 11, 2013 Agency Final Order
Mar. 11, 2013 Agency Final Order
Dec. 19, 2012 Recommended Order Petitioner failed to establish that he was subject to a hostile work environment, or that his termination was the result of retaliatory discharge.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer