STATE OF FLORIDA
DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
AUBREY SERPAS, )
)
Petitioner, )
)
vs. )
) STATE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION, )
)
Respondent. )
Case No. 12-3250
)
RECOMMENDED ORDER
Pursuant to notice, a final hearing was held in this case on December 7, 2012, in Chipley, Florida, before Suzanne Van Wyk, duly-appointed Administrative Law Judge of the Division of
Administrative Hearings.
APPEARANCES
For Petitioner: Aubrey Serpas, pro se
825 Idlewild Court
Bonifay, Florida 32425
For Respondent: Brian A. Newman, Esquire
Pennington, Moore, Wilkinson, Bell and Dunbar, P.A.
215 South Monroe Street, Suite 200 Post Office Box 10095 Tallahassee, Florida 32302
STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE
Whether Petitioner transferred to the Florida Retirement System (FRS) Investment Plan from the FRS Pension Plan, pursuant to section 121.4501, Florida Statutes (2012).1/
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
On August 21, 2012, Petitioner, Aubrey Serpas, submitted to the State Board of Administration (SBA) a Request for Intervention requesting to enroll in the FRS Investment Plan.
On September 7, 2012, the SBA notified Petitioner in writing that his Request for Intervention was denied. Petitioner timely filed a Request for Hearing with the Office of Defined Contribution Programs on September 20, 2012, which was forwarded to the Division of Administrative Hearings for assignment of an Administrative Law Judge.
Pursuant to notice, a final hearing was scheduled for December 7, 2012, in Chipley, Florida. The hearing commenced as scheduled. The parties stipulated to the introduction of Respondent’s Exhibits R-1 through R-6. Petitioner testified on his own behalf. Respondent offered no testimony or additional evidence. Respondent submitted a Proposed Recommended Order on January 23, 2013, which has been considered in preparation of this Recommended Order. Petitioner did not file a proposed recommended order.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Petitioner is a 32-year-old former employee of the Florida Department of Corrections. Petitioner was employed as a correctional officer at the Northwest Florida Reception Center
in Washington County, Florida from June 14, 2004, until he resigned on July 23, 2012.
Petitioner is a fully vested member of the State of Florida Retirement System (FRS).
Respondent, State Board of Administration, is the agency with the duty and responsibility to administer the State of Florida Retirement System Investment Plan. See
§ 121.4501(8), Fla. Stat.
In mid-2011, Petitioner decided to look for other employment and began researching his retirement options. Petitioner discovered he needed to be employed by the State for six years to be fully vested in the FRS and have the option to transfer from the FRS Pension Plan (a defined benefit plan) to the FRS Investment Plan (a defined contribution plan).
Sometime between May 1 and 10, 2012, Petitioner accessed the FRS website, either downloaded or printed the FRS “second election form” –- the paperwork required to transfer his retirement account to the Investment Plan -- and completed the form.
Although Petitioner does not remember the exact date, Petitioner approached Ms. Charity Pleas, Secretary Specialist for the Chief of Security, and asked her to file his second election form for him by facsimile transmission (fax).
Ms. Pleas testified she faxed the document to the number on the form.
Petitioner observed Ms. Pleas place the paperwork into the fax machine, dial a fax number, complete the fax transmission, and retrieve a fax transmission confirmation report. Ms. Pleas handed the confirmation report to Petitioner.
Petitioner cannot be certain what became of the confirmation report or his original second election form.
Petitioner did not contact anyone with the Florida Retirement System to confirm receipt of his second election form.
Ms. Pleas often sends faxes on behalf of employees at the Reception Center where she has been employed since 2007.
Ms. Pleas occasionally receives complaints from employees that a fax she has sent on their behalf was not received by the other party. Sometimes this happens despite the fact that she has received a fax confirmation report.
Petitioner began employment in the private sector with Power South on July 30, 2012.
In early August 2012, Petitioner contacted the FRS to find out if the retirement funds were available to move into a 401K account with his new employer. He spoke with someone named “Jason” who said there was no record of a second election having been made by Petitioner. An investigation ensued.
Aon Hewitt is the Plan Choice Administrator for the FRS Investment Plan. Aon Hewitt provides services to the SBA in connection with the Investment Plan, including processing enrollments and second elections.
Lynette Murphy is Benefits Operations Manager for Hewitt Associates, LLC, a division of Aon Hewitt.
Ms. Murphy researched the issue of whether Petitioner’s second election form was received by Aon Hewitt. She conducted several searches of the company’s files, including a search by Petitioner’s name (both first and last names) and social security number. In case the second election form had been received without a member name or social security number, Ms. Murphy also conducted a search on the numbers “99” and “90,” the codes assigned to forms received which are unidentifiable.
Ms. Murphy’s search included not only forms received between April 1, 2012 and July 30, 2012, but also all dates covering the life of Petitioner’s eligibility and enrollment in the FRS.
Ms. Murphy was unable to find any record of a second election form filed by Petitioner.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
Petitioner has the burden of proof in this proceeding to prove his enrollment in the FRS Investment Plan by a preponderance of the evidence. See § 120.57(1)(j), Fla. Stat.
FRS provides two retirement options: the Pension Plan, which is a defined benefit plan, and the Investment Plan, which is a defined contribution plan. See §§ 121.051 and 121.4501, Fla. Stat. With a few exceptions, state officers and employees are automatically enrolled in the Pension Plan on the date of employment. See § 121.051, Fla. Stat.
Members of the FRS have two opportunities to transfer from the Pension Plan to the Investment Plan.
The first election can be made during the first five months of employment by submitting the appropriate election form to the Plan Choice Administrator. See Fla. Admin. Code R. 19- 11.006(2).
Section 121.4501(4)(g), Florida Statutes, governs the second election option, and provides as follows:
(g) After the period during which an eligible employee had the choice to elect the pension plan or the investment plan, or the month following the receipt of the eligible employee’s plan election, if sooner, the employee shall have one opportunity, at the employee’s discretion, to choose to move from the pension plan to the investment plan or from the investment plan to the pension plan. Eligible employees may elect to move between plans only if they are earning service credit in an employer-employee relationship consistent with s. 121.021(17)(b), excluding leaves of absence without pay. Effective July 1, 2005, such elections are effective on the first day of the month following the receipt of the election by the third-party administrator and are not subject to the
requirements regarding an employer-employee relationship or receipt of contributions for the eligible employee in the effective month, except when the election is received by the third-party administrator.
The procedure for making a second election is governed by Florida Administrative Code Rule 19-11.007(2), which reads, in pertinent part, as follows:
A member may make a valid 2nd election only if the 2nd election is made and processed by the Plan Choice Administrator while the member is actively employed and earning salary and service credit in an employer- employee relationship consistent with the requirements of section 121.021(17)(b),
F. S. It is the responsibility of the member to assure that the 2nd election is received by the Plan Choice Administrator no later than 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the last business day the member is earning salary and service credit.
Petitioner presented some evidence of his attempt to file a second election form. He printed or downloaded the form, completed it, and asked Ms. Pleas to fax it for him. He watched Ms. Pleas fax the form he provided to her, but he could not testify with confidence that Ms. Pleas faxed the second election form to the number provided on the form. Further, Ms. Pleas testified that although she received a fax confirmation report, the fax machine does, with some regularity, produce a fax confirmation report in error. Finally, Petitioner was unable to produce either his original completed form or the fax
confirmation report to determine the fax number to which the form was faxed. Petitioner has not carried his burden of proof.
Based on the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is RECOMMENDED that the State Board of Administration enter a final order denying the relief requested in Petitioner’s Petition for Hearing.
DONE AND ENTERED this <day> day of <month>, <year>, in Tallahassee, Leon County, Florida.
S
SUZANNE VAN WYK
Administrative Law Judge
Division of Administrative Hearings The DeSoto Building
1230 Apalachee Parkway
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3060
(850) 488-9675
Fax Filing (850) 921-6847 www.doah.state.fl.us
Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this <day> day of <month>, <year>.
ENDNOTE
1/ All references to Florida Statutes are to the 2012 version.
COPIES FURNISHED:
Brian A. Newman, Esquire Pennington, Moore, Wilkinson,
Bell and Dunbar, P.A.
215 South Monroe Street, Suite 200 Post Office Box 10095
Tallahassee, Florida 32302
Aubrey Serpas
825 Idlewood Court
Bonifay, Florida 32425
Ash Williams, Executive Director and Chief Investment Officer
State Board of Administration
1801 Hermitage Boulevard, Suite 100 Post Office Box 13300
Tallahassee, Florida 32317
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EXCEPTIONS
All parties have the right to submit written exceptions within
15 days from the date of this Recommended Order. Any exceptions to this Recommended Order should be filed with the agency that will issue the Final Order in this case.
Issue Date | Document | Summary |
---|---|---|
Feb. 20, 2013 | Agency Final Order | |
Jan. 30, 2013 | Recommended Order | Petitioner did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he made a second election to transfer from the Florida Retirement System (FRS) Pension Plan to the FRS Investment Plan. |