Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

DAYNA R. PROVOST vs FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, 12-003964 (2012)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 12-003964 Visitors: 16
Petitioner: DAYNA R. PROVOST
Respondent: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
Judges: LINZIE F. BOGAN
Agency: Florida Commission on Human Relations
Locations: Fort Myers, Florida
Filed: Dec. 11, 2012
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Wednesday, January 9, 2013.

Latest Update: Jul. 23, 2013
TempHtml


STATE OF FLORIDA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS


DAYNA R. PREVOST, EEOC Case No. 15D201200485


Petitioner, FCHR Case No. 2012-01669


v. DOAH Case Nos. 13-1641

12-3964

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN

AND FAMILIES, FCHR Order No. 13-049


Respondent.

/


FINAL ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR RELIEF FROM AN UNLAWFUL EMPLOYMENT PRACTICE


This matter is before the Commission for consideration of the “Order Rejecting Remand from Florida Commission on Human Relations, Relinquishing Jurisdiction and Closing File,” dated May 10, 2013, issued in the above-styled matter by Administrative Law Judge Linzie F. Bogan.


Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law


The Order before the Commission reflects that the matter had come before the Administrative Law Judge on the Commission’s “Order Remanding Case to Administrative Law Judge for Further Proceedings on Petition for Relief,” FCHR Order No. 13-028, dated April 4, 2013.

The Order before the Commission notes that the Commission’s remand order disagrees with the Administrative Law Judge’s conclusion set out in an “Order Closing File and

Relinquishing Jurisdiction,” dated January 9, 2013, that the case should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction due to the operation of the doctrine of collateral estoppel. In the Order currently before the Commission, the Administrative Law Judge concluded that, under the Administrative Procedure Act, the application of the doctrine of collateral estoppel is not a conclusion of law within the substantive jurisdiction of the Commission. Therefore, regardless of the Commission’s disagreement with the Administrative Law Judge’s application of the doctrine of collateral estoppel to this case, the Administrative Law Judge rejected the Commission’s remand order that had directed further proceedings on the Petition for Relief, and the Administrative Law Judge relinquished jurisdiction of the case back to the Commission.

The Administrative Procedure Act states that in reviewing a Recommended Order of an Administrative Law Judge an administrative agency “…may reject or modify conclusions of law over which it has substantive jurisdiction…” Section 120.57(1)(l), Florida Statutes (2012).


Filed July 23, 2013 10:54 AM Division of Administrative Hearings


Case law suggests that the application of the doctrine of collateral estoppel by an Administrative Law Judge is not a conclusion of law within the “substantive jurisdiction” of an administrative agency. See, Deep Lagoon Boat Club, Ltd. v. Sheridan, 784 So. 2d 1140 (Fla. 2nd DCA 2001).

For reasons set out in the Commission’s remand order issued earlier in this case, FCHR Order No. 13-028, we believe that the Administrative Law Judge committed an error of law in applying the doctrine of collateral estoppel to this case.

Nevertheless, case law indicates that it is an appeals court, rather than the administrative agency, that has jurisdiction to correct an error of law of an Administrative Law Judge which is not within the “substantive jurisdiction” of the administrative agency. See, G.E.L. Corporation v. Department of Environmental Protection, et al., 875 So. 2d 1257 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).


Exceptions


Neither party filed exceptions to the Administrative Law Judge’s “Order Rejecting Remand from Florida Commission on Human Relations, Relinquishing Jurisdiction and Closing File.”


Dismissal


The Petition for Relief and Complaint of Discrimination are DISMISSED with prejudice.

The parties have the right to seek judicial review of this Order. The Commission and the appropriate District Court of Appeal must receive notice of appeal within 30 days of the date this Order is filed with the Clerk of the Commission. Explanation of the right to appeal is found in Section 120.68, Florida Statutes, and in the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.110.


DONE AND ORDERED this 23rd day of July , 2013. FOR THE FLORIDA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS:


Commissioner Gilbert M. Singer, Panel Chairperson; Commissioner Lizzette Romano; and

Commissioner Mario M. Valle


Filed this 23rd day of July , 2013, in Tallahassee, Florida.


/s/ Violet Crawford, Clerk

Commission on Human Relations 2009 Apalachee Parkway, Suite 100

Tallahassee, FL 32301

(850) 488-7082


Copies furnished to:


Dayna R. Prevost

c/o Joseph M. Herbert, Esq. 2033 Main Street, Suite 600

Sarasota, FL 34237


Florida Department of Children and Families c/o Eugenie G. Rehak, Esq.

Post Office Box 60085 Fort Myers, FL 33906


Linzie F. Bogan, Administrative Law Judge, DOAH James Mallue, Legal Advisor for Commission Panel


I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing has been mailed to the above listed addressees this 23rd day of July , 2013.


By: /s/ Clerk of the Commission

Florida Commission on Human Relations


Docket for Case No: 12-003964
Issue Date Proceedings
Jul. 23, 2013 (Agency) Final Order Dismissing Petition for Relief from an Unlawful Emplyment Practice filed.
Apr. 30, 2013 Agency Final Order Remanding Case to Administrative Law Judge for Further Proceedings on Petition for Relief filed. (DOAH CASE NO. 13-1641 ESTABLISHED)
Apr. 04, 2013 Agency Final Order Remanding Case to Administrative Law Judge for Further Proceedings on Petition for Relief filed.
Jan. 09, 2013 Order Closing File and Relinquishing Jurisdiction. CASE CLOSED.
Jan. 02, 2013 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
Jan. 02, 2013 Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for January 29, 2013; 9:30 a.m.; Fort Myers and Tallahassee, FL).
Dec. 27, 2012 Respondents Motion for a Recommended Order of Dismissal filed.
Dec. 27, 2012 Answer filed.
Dec. 20, 2012 Joint Response to Initial Order filed.
Dec. 19, 2012 Notice of Appearance and Designation of E-mail Addresses Pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516 (filed by E. Rehak).
Dec. 11, 2012 Initial Order.
Dec. 11, 2012 Employment Complaint of Discrimination filed.
Dec. 11, 2012 Notice of Determination: No Cause filed.
Dec. 11, 2012 Determination: No Cause filed.
Dec. 11, 2012 Transmittal of Petition filed by the Agency.
Dec. 11, 2012 Petition for Relief filed.

Orders for Case No: 12-003964
Issue Date Document Summary
Jul. 23, 2013 Agency Final Order
Apr. 04, 2013 Agency Final Order
Apr. 04, 2013 Agency Final Order
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer