Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DENISE JOHNSON-ACOSTA vs CORDELL JOHN, PROPERTY OWNER, 13-003283 (2013)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 13-003283 Visitors: 25
Petitioner: DENISE JOHNSON-ACOSTA
Respondent: CORDELL JOHN, PROPERTY OWNER
Judges: R. BRUCE MCKIBBEN
Agency: Commissions
Locations: Orlando, Florida
Filed: Aug. 29, 2013
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Tuesday, December 3, 2013.

Latest Update: Feb. 20, 2014
Summary: The issue in this case is whether Respondent, Cordell John, (Landlord) discriminated against Petitioner, Denise Johnson- Acosta (Johnson) on the basis of her or her daughter’s alleged handicap in violation of the Florida Fair Housing Act.Petitioner did not prove discrimination by Landlord.
TempHtml


STATE OF FLORIDA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS


DENISE JOHNSON-ACOSTA, HUD Case No. 04-13-0636-8


Petitioner, FCHR Case No. 2013H0224


v. DOAH Case No. 13-3283


CORDELL JOHN, PROPERTY OWNER, FCHR Order No. 14-002


Respondent.

/


FINAL ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR RELIEF FROM A DISCRIMINATORY HOUSING PRACTICE


Preliminary Matters


Petitioner Denise Johnson-Acosta filed a housing discrimination complaint pursuant to the Fair Housing Act, Sections 760.20 - 760.37, Florida Statutes (2012), alleging that Respondent Cordell John, Property Owner, committed discriminatory housing practices relating to the lease of a residential townhome on the bases of the disability of Petitioner and the disability of Petitioner’s daughter. Specifically, Petitioner alleges that Respondent unlawfully assessed a pet deposit for her daughter’s emotional support animal, and unlawfully refused to make needed repairs as a reasonable accommodation.

The allegations set forth in the complaint were investigated, and, on July 26, 2013, the Executive Director issued a determination finding that there was no reasonable cause to believe that a discriminatory housing practice had occurred.

Petitioner filed a Petition for Relief from a Discriminatory Housing Practice and the case was transmitted to the Division of Administrative Hearings for the conduct of a formal proceeding.

An evidentiary hearing was held by video teleconference at sites in Orlando and Tallahassee, Florida, on November 14, 2013, before Administrative Law Judge R. Bruce McKibben.

Judge McKibben issued a Recommended Order of dismissal, dated December 3,

2013.

The Commission panel designated below considered the record of this matter and

determined the action to be taken on the Recommended Order.


Findings of Fact


A transcript of the proceeding before the Administrative Law Judge was not filed with the Commission. In the absence of a transcript of the proceeding before the


Filed February 20, 2014 11:54 AM Division of Administrative Hearings


Administrative Law Judge, the Recommended Order is the only evidence for the Commission to consider. See National Industries, Inc. v. Commission on Human Relations, et al., 527 So. 2d 894, at 897, 898 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). Accord, Mack v. Agency for Persons with Disabilities, FCHR Order No. 11-026 (March 17, 2011), Hall v. Villages of West Oaks HOA, FCHR Order No. 08-007 (January 14, 2008), Beach- Gutierrez v. Bay Medical Center, FCHR Order No. 05-011 (January 19, 2005), and

Waaser v. Streit’s Motorsports, FCHR Order No. 04-157 (November 30, 2004).

The Administrative Law Judge found, “Johnson submitted a letter into evidence from a behavioral health care employee. The letter, dated some five months after Johnson vacated the unit, said that Ashley would benefit from having a companion dog as she did not have many friends.” Recommended Order, ¶ 11. It would appear from the record

that this document was actually the Respondent’s Exhibit O. It further appears that Petitioner submitted a document dated 10-1-12, Petitioner’s Exhibit 1, relating to this issue. Nevertheless, in the absence of a transcript of the proceeding before the Administrative Law Judge we are unable to determine the application of these documents to the testimony provided.

With these comments, we adopt the Administrative Law Judge’s findings of fact.


Conclusions of Law


We find the Administrative Law Judge’s application of the law to the facts to result in a correct disposition of the matter.

We adopt the Administrative Law Judge’s conclusions of law.


Exceptions


Neither of the parties filed exceptions to the Administrative Law Judge’s Recommended Order.


Dismissal


The Petition for Relief and Housing Discrimination Complaint are DISMISSED with prejudice.

The parties have the right to seek judicial review of this Order. The Commission and the appropriate District Court of Appeal must receive notice of appeal within 30 days of the date this Order is filed with the Clerk of the Commission. Explanation of the right to appeal is found in Section 120.68, Florida Statutes, and in the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.110.


DONE AND ORDERED this 19th day of February , 2014. FOR THE FLORIDA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS:


Commissioner Mario M. Valle, Panel Chairperson; Commissioner Onelia Fajardo-Garcia; and Commissioner Gilbert M. Singer


Filed this 19th day of February , 2014, in Tallahassee, Florida.


/s/ Violet Crawford, Clerk

Commission on Human Relations 2009 Apalachee Parkway, Suite 100

Tallahassee, FL 32301

(850) 488-7082


Copies furnished to:


Denise Johnson-Acosta Post Office Box 453347 Kissimmee, FL 34745


Cordell John, Property Owner 2921 Swoops Circle

Kissimmee, FL 34741


R. Bruce McKibben, Administrative Law Judge, DOAH James Mallue, Legal Advisor for Commission Panel


I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing has been mailed to the above listed addressees this 19th day of February , 2014.


By: /s/ Clerk of the Commission

Florida Commission on Human Relations


Docket for Case No: 13-003283
Issue Date Proceedings
Feb. 20, 2014 Agency Final Order Dismissing Petition for Relief from a Discriminatory Housing Practice filed.
Dec. 03, 2013 Recommended Order (hearing held November 14, 2013). CASE CLOSED.
Dec. 03, 2013 Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
Dec. 02, 2013 Respondent`s Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Nov. 27, 2013 (Petitioner`s) Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Nov. 14, 2013 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Nov. 13, 2013 Petitioner's Proposed Exhibits filed (exhibits not available for viewing).
Nov. 13, 2013 Notice of Transfer.
Oct. 30, 2013 Witness List filed.
Sep. 23, 2013 Certified Return Receipt received this date from the U.S. Postal Service.
Sep. 16, 2013 Certified Mail Receipts stamped this date by the U.S. Postal Service.
Sep. 16, 2013 Court Reporter Notice filed.
Sep. 16, 2013 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
Sep. 16, 2013 Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for November 14, 2013; 9:30 a.m.; Orlando and Tallahassee, FL).
Aug. 29, 2013 Initial Order.
Aug. 29, 2013 Housing Discrimination Complaint filed.
Aug. 29, 2013 Determination filed.
Aug. 29, 2013 Notice of Determination of No Cause filed.
Aug. 29, 2013 Petition for Relief filed.
Aug. 29, 2013 Transmittal of Petition filed by the Agency.

Orders for Case No: 13-003283
Issue Date Document Summary
Feb. 19, 2014 Agency Final Order
Dec. 03, 2013 Recommended Order Petitioner did not prove discrimination by Landlord.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer