Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

PEAVY & SON CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES, 16-002054BID (2016)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 16-002054BID Visitors: 8
Petitioner: PEAVY & SON CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Judges: LINZIE F. BOGAN
Agency: Department of Management Services
Locations: Tallahassee, Florida
Filed: Apr. 14, 2016
Status: Closed
Settled and/or Dismissed prior to entry of RO/FO on Monday, May 2, 2016.

Latest Update: May 19, 2016
16002054_282_05192016_16080296_e

STATE OF FLORIDA

DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS



PEAVY & SON CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.


Petitioner,

V.

Final Order No. DMS - 16-0038


DMS Case No.: 16-33792 DOAH CASE NO.: 16-2054BID


STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES,


Respondent.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I


FINAL ORDER


On May 2, 2016, Judge Linzie F. Bogan, an administrative law judge ("ALJ"), with the Division of Administrative Hearings entered an Order Closing File and Relinquishing Jurisdiction ("Order") back to the Department of Management Services ("Department"), a copy of which is attached as Exhibit A. The Order relinquished jurisdiction of the proceeding back to the Department with the recommendation that the Petitioner's protest be dismissed due to untimeliness.

On February 24, 2016, the Department posted its Advertisement to Bid Construction (Advertisement), and related bid documents, for a project in Tallahassee and stated in capital letters that it was requesting proposals from qualified general contractors. The Petitioner, Peavy & Son Construction, Co., Inc., is not a qualified general contractor. Any challenge to the specification provisions in the Advertisement was due on or by the close of business on Monday, February 29, 2016. The Petitioner filed its Notice oflntent to Protest on March 22, 2016, and its Formal Written Protest on April 1, 2016. The Department referred the Petitioner's protest to the Division of Administrative Hearings.


Filed May 19, 2016 4:08 PM Division of Administrative Hearings

Pursuant to Section 120.57(3)(b), Florida Statutes, a protest to the terms, conditions, and specifications contained in a solicitation, including the provisions governing the methods for ranking bids, proposals or replies, awarding contracts, reserving rights of further negotiation, or modifying or amending any contract must be filed within 72 hours after the posting of the solicitation.

The Department subsequently filed a Motion to Dismiss the Petitioner's Formal Written Protest stating that the protest challenges the terms, conditions, and specifications contained in the Advertisement and bid documents for the project and is thus an untimely specifications challenge.

The purpose of a solicitation or specifications challenge is to allow an agency to correct or clarify plans and specifications prior to accepting bids or replies to save expense and to assure

fair competition. Optiplan, Inc. v. Sch. Bd. of Broward County. 710 So. 2d 569, 572 (Fla. 4th


DCA 1998); Capeletti Bros., Inc. v. Dept. of Transportation, 499 So. 2d 855 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).

Even where a vendor presents its protest as challenging an intended award, if the substance of the challenge is to a solicitation's terms, conditions, or specifications, the protest must be brought within 72 hours of the solicitation's posting or the right to protest is waived.

See, e.g., Consultech of Jacksonville, Inc. v. Dep't of Health, 876 So. 2d 731, 734 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (holding vendor waived right to challenge agency's weighting of cost proposals as vendor

failed to timely file specifications protest); Optiplan. Inc. v. Sch. Bd. of Broward County. 710 So. 2d 569, 572 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (holding vendor waived right to challenge evaluation criteria as being biased and unreliable as vendor failed to timely file specifications protest).

As stated in the ALJ's Order, the Petitioner's Protest is "untimely because it failed to comply with the requirements of section 120.57(3)(b). Here, the Petitioner has waived its right to challenge the terms, conditions, and specifications set forth in the Advertisement by its failure to timely challenge the same pursuant to Section 120.57(3)(b), Florida Statutes.

Having considered the ALJ's Order, and the applicable law, it is concluded that the recommendation of the ALJ is correct.

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:


  1. The Order Closing File and Relinquishing Jurisdiction is adopted in its entirety and is incorporated herein by reference.

  2. The Formal Written Protest filed by the Petitioner is dismissed with prejudice for untimeliness.

DONE and ORDERED this 12th day of May 2016.


CHAD to gency Secretary Department of Management Services 4050 Esplanade Way

Tallahassee, FL 32399-0950

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL


Unless expressly waived by a party such as in a stipulation or in other similar forms of settlement, any party substantially affected by this final order may seek judicial review by filing an original notice of appeal with the agency clerk of the department of management services, and a copy, accompanied by filing fees prescribed by law, with the clerk of the appropriate district court of appeal. The notice of appeal must be filed within thirty (30) days of rendition of this order, in accordance with Rule 9.110, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, and Section 120.68, Florida Statutes.


Certificate of Clerk:


Filed in the Office of the Agency

Clerk of the Department of Management

Services n this 13th day of       201 .


Copies Furnished To:


Christopher T. McRae, Esq. McRae and Metcalf, P.A.

2612 Centennial Place

Tallahassee, FL 32308


Susan Dawson,

Assistant General Counsel Department of Management Services 4050 Esplanade Way, Ste. 160

Tallahassee, FL 32399





Docket for Case No: 16-002054BID
Issue Date Proceedings
May 19, 2016 Agency Final Order filed.
May 02, 2016 Order Closing File and Relinquishing Jurisdiction. CASE CLOSED.
Apr. 29, 2016 Department's Motion for Protective Order filed.
Apr. 28, 2016 Peavy's Motion to Compel Interrogatory Answers filed.
Apr. 27, 2016 Department of Management Services' Response to Petitioner's First Request for Admissions filed.
Apr. 27, 2016 Department's Response to Petitioner's First Request for Production filed.
Apr. 27, 2016 Department's Notice of Serving Responses to Petitioner's First Set of Interrogatories filed.
Apr. 26, 2016 Notice of Serving Peavy and Son Construction, Co., Inc.'s Response to DMS's First Set of Interrogatories filed.
Apr. 26, 2016 Peavys Responses to DMS's First Request for Production filed.
Apr. 25, 2016 Peavy's Responses to DMS' First Request for Admissions filed.
Apr. 22, 2016 Peavy's First Request for Production filed.
Apr. 22, 2016 Peavy's First Request for Admissions filed.
Apr. 22, 2016 Notice of Serving Peavys First Set of Interrogatories filed.
Apr. 22, 2016 Peavy's Response in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss filed.
Apr. 21, 2016 Department's First Request for Production to Petitioner filed.
Apr. 21, 2016 Department's First Set of Interrogatories to Petitioner filed.
Apr. 21, 2016 Department's Notice of Serving First Set of Interrogatories to the Petitioner filed.
Apr. 19, 2016 Department's First Request for Admissions to Petitioner filed.
Apr. 18, 2016 Department of Management Services' Notice of Compliance filed.
Apr. 18, 2016 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
Apr. 18, 2016 Notice of Hearing (hearing set for May 10, 2016; 9:00 a.m.; Tallahassee, FL).
Apr. 18, 2016 Department's Motion to Dismiss (corrected) filed.
Apr. 14, 2016 Department's Motion to Dismiss filed.
Apr. 14, 2016 Formal Protest and Petition for Administrative Hearing filed.
Apr. 14, 2016 Agency referral filed.

Orders for Case No: 16-002054BID
Issue Date Document Summary
May 12, 2016 Agency Final Order
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer