Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

ALICIA VALENTINE vs CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE, 16-003951 (2016)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 16-003951 Visitors: 17
Petitioner: ALICIA VALENTINE
Respondent: CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE
Judges: JOHN G. VAN LANINGHAM
Agency: Florida Commission on Human Relations
Locations: Miami, Florida
Filed: Jul. 15, 2016
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Wednesday, December 7, 2016.

Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2017
Summary: The issue in this case is whether Respondent unlawfully discriminated against Petitioner on the basis of her race or sex in violation of the Florida Fair Housing Act.Respondent did not unlawfully discriminate against Petitioner on the basis of her race or sex in violation of the Florida Fair Housing Act.
TempHtml


STATE OF FLORIDA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS


ALICIA VALENTINE, HUD Case No.


Petitioner, FCHR Case No.


v. DOAH No. 16-3951


CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE,

FCHR Order No.


Respondent.

/


FINAL ORDER DISMISSING PETITIO N FOR

RELIE F FROM A DISCRIMINATORY HOUSING PRACTIC E


Preliminary Matters


Petitioner Alicia Valentine filed an amended housing discrimination complaint pursuant to the Fair Housing Act, Sections 760.20 - 760.37, Florida Statutes

alleging that Respondent Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese committed a discriminatory housing practice by denying Petitioner rental assistance in Respondent's Homeless Prevention and Rapid Re-Housing Program.

The allegations set forth in the complaint were investigated, and, on June 9,

the Executive Director issued a determination finding that there was no reasonable cause to believe that a discriminatory housing practice had occurred.

Petitioner filed a Petition for Relief from a Discriminatory Housing Practice and the case was transmitted to the Division of Administrative Hearings for the conduct of a formal proceeding.

An evidentiary hearing was held by video teleconference at sites in Miami and Tallahassee, Florida, on November 3, before Administrative Law Judge John G. Van Laningham.

Judge Van Laningham issued a Recommended Order of dismissal, dated December 7, 2016.

The Commission panel designated below considered the record of this matter and determined the action to be taken on the Recommended Order.


Findings of Fact


A transcript of the proceeding before the Administrative Law Judge was not filed with the Commission. In the absence of a transcript of the proceeding before the

Law Judge, the Recommended Order is the only evidence for the


Filed March 2, 2017 2:05 PM Division of Administrative Hearings


Commission to consider. See National Inc. v. Commission on Human

et al.. 527 So. 2d 894, at 897, 898 5th DCA Accord, Coleman v.

Beach, Ocean Center Parking Garage, FCHR Order No. (September Gantz. et al. v. Zion's Hope. Inc.. d/b/a Holy Land Experience. FCHR Order No. (June 6, and Hall v. Villages of West Oaks HOA. FCHR Order No. 08-007

(January 14, 2008).

We adopt the Administrative Law Judge's findings of fact.


Conclusions of Law


We find the Administrative Law Judge's application of the law to the facts to result in a correct disposition of the matter.

We note that the Administrative Law Judge concluded that the financial rental assistance provided by the Respondent "is not a 'service' under section 760.23(2), even i f the purpose of the gift is to enable the recipient to pay his or her rent," and that, therefore, Petitioner's "claim fails as a matter of law." See Recommended Order,

Given that the Administrative Law Judge also found that even i f the claim was "legally sufficient," Petitioner failed to prove her charge, we conclude it is unnecessary to either accept or reject the conclusion of law indicating that the financial assistance provided by Respondent to renters was not a "service" within the meaning of the above- indicated section of the Fair Housing Act. See, generally, v. Camelot Residence's Association. Inc.. et FCHR Order No. (April 7, a case brought pursuant to the Fair Housing Act in which a Commission Panel concluded that, because of the decision on the merits against the Petitioner, it was unnecessary to either accept or reject the conclusion of law that the Petitioner did not have standing to bring the matter.

With this comment, we adopt the Administrative Law Judge's conclusions of law.


Exceptions


Neither of the parties filed exceptions to the Administrative Law Judge's Recommended Order.


Dismissal


The Petition for Relief and Amended Housing Discrimination Complaint are DISMISSED with prejudice.

The parties have the right to seek judicial review of this Order. The Commission and the appropriate District Court of Appeal must receive notice of appeal within 30 days of the date this Order is filed with the Clerk of the Commission. Explanation of the right to appeal is found in Section Florida and in the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure


DONE AND ORDERED this day of

FOR THE FLORIDA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS:


Commissioner Rebecca Steele, Panel Chairperson; Commissioner Derick Daniel; and

Commissioner Gilbert M. Singer


Filed this day of

in Tallahassee, Florida.


Commission on Human Relations 4075 Esplanade Way, Room Tallahassee, FL 32399

(850) 488-7082


Copies furnished to:


Alicia Valentine

121 W. Chestnut Street, Ste. 2208

Chicago, 60610


Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese c/o Thomas H. Courtney, Esq.

J. Patrick Fitzgerald & Associates, Merrick Way, Ste. 3-B

Coral Gables, 33134

John G. Van Laningham, Administrative Law Judge, DOAH James Mallue, Legal Advisor for Commission Panel


I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing has been mailed to the above listed addressees this day of 2017.


By:

Clerk of the

Florida Commission on Human Relations


Docket for Case No: 16-003951
Issue Date Proceedings
Mar. 02, 2017 Agency Final Order Dismissing Petition for Relief From a Discriminatory Housing Practice filed.
Dec. 07, 2016 Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
Dec. 07, 2016 Recommended Order (hearing held November 3, 2016). CASE CLOSED.
Nov. 14, 2016 Alicia Valentine (Petitioner's) Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Nov. 14, 2016 (Respondent's Proposed) Recommended Order filed.
Nov. 03, 2016 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Oct. 27, 2016 Court Reporter Request filed.
Oct. 27, 2016 Witness List filed.
Oct. 27, 2016 Letter from Alicia Valentine stating Respondent does not have permission to use personal information filed.
Oct. 24, 2016 Request for Audio Conference for the November 3, 2016, Hearing Date filed.
Oct. 14, 2016 Certified Return Receipt received this date from the U.S. Postal Service.
Oct. 06, 2016 Certified Mail Receipts stamped this date by the U.S. Postal Service.
Oct. 06, 2016 Order Granting Continuance and Re-scheduling Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for November 3, 2016; 9:00 a.m.; Miami and Tallahassee, FL; amended as to ).
Oct. 03, 2016 Court Reporter Scheduled filed.
Sep. 21, 2016 (Respondent's) Notice of Filing Proposed Hearing Exhibits filed (exhibits not available for viewing).
Sep. 21, 2016 Notice of Appearance (Thomas Courtney).
Sep. 19, 2016 Notice of Filing Proposed Hearing Exhibits filed. (Exhibits not available for viewing) 
 Confidential document; not available for viewing.
Sep. 19, 2016 Notice of Filing Prospective Hearing Witness List filed.
Sep. 19, 2016 Notice of Appearance (Thoms Courtney) filed.
Aug. 08, 2016 Certified Return Receipt received this date from the U.S. Postal Service.
Jul. 28, 2016 Certified Mail Receipts stamped this date by the U.S. Postal Service.
Jul. 28, 2016 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
Jul. 28, 2016 Notice of Hearing by Video Teleconference (hearing set for October 6, 2016; 9:00 a.m.; Miami and Tallahassee, FL).
Jul. 27, 2016 Notice of Transfer.
Jul. 26, 2016 Respondent's Status Report in Response to Initial Order filed.
Jul. 26, 2016 Notice of Appearance (Maura Jennings) filed.
Jul. 18, 2016 Initial Order.
Jul. 15, 2016 Amended Housing Discrimination Complaint filed.
Jul. 15, 2016 Notice of Determination of No Cause filed.
Jul. 15, 2016 Determination filed.
Jul. 15, 2016 Petition for Relief filed.
Jul. 15, 2016 Transmittal of Petition filed by the Agency.

Orders for Case No: 16-003951
Issue Date Document Summary
Mar. 02, 2017 Agency Final Order
Dec. 07, 2016 Recommended Order Respondent did not unlawfully discriminate against Petitioner on the basis of her race or sex in violation of the Florida Fair Housing Act.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer