Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

BROWARD COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD vs CRAIG DUDLEY, 18-006215TTS (2018)

Court: Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 18-006215TTS Visitors: 18
Petitioner: BROWARD COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD
Respondent: CRAIG DUDLEY
Judges: CATHY M. SELLERS
Agency: County School Boards
Locations: Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Filed: Nov. 20, 2018
Status: Closed
Recommended Order on Wednesday, July 17, 2019.

Latest Update: Aug. 12, 2019
Summary: Whether just cause exists for Petitioner to terminate Respondent's employment as a teacher.Petitioner proved that Respondent violated State Board of Education rules and school board policies. This constitutes just cause to suspend him without back pay. Recommend suspension and reinstatement without back pay.
THE BROWARD COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, FLORIDA ROBERT W. RUNCIE, Superintendent of Schools, Petitioner, v. CRAIG DUDLEY, Respondent. / ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT Petitioner, Robert W. Runcie, Superintendent of Schools of Broward County, Florida (“Petitioner”), through his undersigned counsel, files this Administrative Complaint against Respondent, Craig Dudley (“DUDLEY”). The Petitioner seeks termination of Respondent’s employment with the Broward County School Board (“School Board”) pursuant to Chapter 120 and Sections 1001.51, 1012.27(5), and 1012.33 Florida Statutes and Rule 6A-5.056 of the Florida Administrative Code. The Petitioner alleges the following: I. JURISDICTIONAL BASIS Le The agency is the Broward County School Board, Florida, located at 600 Southeast Third Avenue, Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida 33301. 2. The Petitioner is Robert Ww. Runcie, who is the Superintendent. of Schools of Broward County, Florida. The Petitioner is statutorily obligated to recommend the placement of school personnel and to require compliance and observance with all laws, rules, and regulations. Petitioner is authorized to report and enforce any violation thereof, together with recommending the appropriate disciplinary action against any instructional personnel employed by the School Board, inclusive of DUDLEY. DUDLEY is an employee of the Broward County School Board and is currently employed as a teacher pursuant to a Professional Services Contract, issued in accordance with Section 1012.33(1) (a), Florida Statutes (2018). The last known address of DUDLEY is 3301 N.W. 47th Terrace, Lauderdale Lakes, Florida 33319. II. MATERIAL ALLEGATIONS This recommendation is based upon conduct occurring during the 2017-2018 school year. DUDLEY is a physical education teacher at Crystal Lake Middle School. DUDLEY was hired by the School Board on August 10, 2004, as a teacher. DUDLEY reported to work on or about May 18, 2018, under the influence of cocaine and alcohol. 10. 21 12. 13. 14. 15 « On or about May 18, 2018, although assigned morning duty in the school’s café before school started, DUDLEY was only present in the café for a brief time. On or about May 18, 2018, DUDLEY was observed as being “in and out” of his assigned homeroom, which began at approximately 9:30 A.M. and ended at approximately 10:00 A.M. On or about May 18, 2018, DUDLEY failed to come to the gym at all to cover his first period class, which began at approximately 10:05 A.M. and ended at approximately 10:56 A.M. On or about May 18, 2018, Cindi Ancona, another physical education instructor, asked DUDLEY, when she saw him walk by at the end of the class, where he had been first period, since she had to cover his class. DUDLEY seemed to Ms. Ancona to be confused and leaned on the wall, smiling, and said he was there. Ms. Ancona became annoyed and told DUDLEY that he was not present because, “I had your class!” DUDLEY then changed his story and said he had to get something from his car. Further, Ms. Ancona observed DUDLEY leaning on the doorframe when he came to get his class for second period. As a student spoke to him, he told her that she was too loud and that she needed to talk very quietly. LG.» avy 18. a9. 20. 21. Ms. Ancona alerted school administration when she observed him the second time, just before second period, that DUDLEY “seemed out of it and seemed confused” as if he was “on something.” Thereafter, Assistant Principal Ben Reeves, and Principal Sabine Phillips reported to the office of the boy’s locker room. Mr. Reeves entered the locker room office and found DUDLEY “laying down on his back on what appeared to be a chair, in the dark, with his feet propped up on an object. He had some type of covering over his body like a piece of clothing or a blanket.” When Mr. Reeves called out to DUDLEY “he appeared to be waking up and kind of stumbled to his feet.” DUDLEY asked, “What did I do now?” when told by Mr. Reeves that Ms. Phillips needs to see him now. Ms. Phillips then entered the locker room office and Ms. Phillips and Mr. Reeves escorted DUDLEY to Ms. Phillips’ office. During the meeting in her office, Ms. Phillips proceeded to ask DUDLEY where he was during class. DUDLEY responded: “I told Coach Ancona that I had to go to my truck to get something...” and that “it took him longer than expected because he had to make a phone call.” 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. ave Ms. Phillips and Mr. Reeves observed that DUDLEY had slurred speech, he seemed confused, disorientated, had glassy eyes, was drowsy, inattentive, and had slow or inappropriate reactions. According to Mr. Reeves, as DUDLEY continued to talk, it was evident that his eyes were red. He appeared to be tired and sluggish and Ms. Phillips informed DUDLEY that she had reasonable suspicion that he was under the influence and informed him that he would have to take a drug and alcohol test immediately. On or about May 18, 2018, Ms. Phillips requested reasonable suspicion testing based on both her and Mr. Reeves’ observing DUDLEY’s glassy eyes and his contradictory statements regarding his presence/absence at work. At approximately 1:32 P.M., a breathalyzer test was administered and DUDLEY tested positive for alcohol with an initial reading of .101. Fifteen minutes later, at approximately 1:47 P.M., another breathalyzer test was administered and DUDLEY blew a reading of .095. Both readings are in excess of the .08 legal limit for driving under the influence in the State of Florida. A urine sample also provided by DUDLEY on this date tested positive for cocaine. 28. 29: 30. 31. 32. 33. As a result, DUDLEY was transported home by the BSO Deputy on campus that day. Iz. PREVIOUS DISCIPLINE SUMMARY MEMO On or about April 21, 2016, DUDLEY was issued a summary memo relating to leaving students unattended in the boys’ locker room when a fight broke out between the students. DUDLEY was in the PE office with a student to tend to the student’s injured leg/knee when six (6) or seven (7) boys decided to jump on (3) three boys who were sitting on the bench getting dressed. VERBAL REPRIMAND On or about February 10, 2017, DUDLEY was issued a verbal reprimand relating to his being absent without notice and excessively tardy to work. DUDLEY was directed to report to work on time and to follow proper protocol for entering an absence if he cannot report to work. WRITTEN REPRIMAND On or about December 1, 2017, DUDLEY was issued a written reprimand relating to his being absent without notice on November 3, 2017, directing him to follow proper protocol if 34. 35s 36. 37. he cannot report to work, after being issued a verbal reprimand on February 10, 2017, for the same reason. On or about February 14, 2018, DUDLEY was issued a written reprimand relating to his failure to meet performance standards as a Physical Education Teacher. Specifically, DUDLEY consistently failed to “follow absence/tardy reporting procedures, resulting in his students being left unsupervised.” IV. ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGES Petitioner realleges and incorporates herein by reference the allegations set forth in paragraphs one (1) through thirty-four (34) above. Just cause exists for the requested relief pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 1012.33(1) (a), Section 6A-5.056 F.A.C., the Respondent’s employment contract, School Board rules and regulations, the Code of Ethics of the Education Profession, and the Employee Disciplinary Guidelines promulgated by the School Board. “Just cause” means cause that is legally sufficient. “Just cause” includes, but is not limited to: KKK B. “Misconduct in Office” means one or more of the following: Ls A violation of the Code of Ethics of the Education Profession in Florida as adopted in Rule 6A- 10.080, F.A.C.3; i A violation of the Principles of Professional Conduct for the Education Profession in Florida as adopted in Rule 6A-10.081, F.A.C.; ay A violation of the adopted school board rules; 4. Behavior that disrupts the student's learning environment; or Sis Behavior that reduces the teacher's ability or his or his colleagues' ability to effectively perform duties. Cr “Incompetency” means the inability, failure or lack of fitness to discharge the required duty as a result of inefficiency or incapacity. 1. “Inefficiency” means one or more of the following: a. Failure to perform duties prescribed by law; b. Failure to communicate appropriately with and relate to students; or Failure to communicate appropriately with and relate to colleagues, administrators, subordinates, or parents; d. Disorganization of his or his classroom to such an extent that the health, safety or welfare of the students is diminished; or e. Excessive absences or tardiness. os “Incapacity” means one or more of the following: a. Lack of emotional stability; bi. Lack of adequate physical ability; Gs Lack of general educational background; or d. Lack of adequate command of his or his area of specialization. Ds “Gross insubordination” means the intentional refusal to obey a direct order, reasonable in nature, and given by and with proper authority; misfeasance, or malfeasance as to involve failure in the performance of the required duties. E. “Willful neglect of duty” means intentional or reckless failure to carry out required duties. xk kk 1 Repealed 3-23-16. Vv. JUST CAUSE FOR DISCIPLINE A. JUST CAUSE 38. Based on the aforementioned allegations, Respondent’s actions constitute just cause to terminate his employment. B. MISCONDUCT IN OFFICE 39. Respondent’s actions constitute misconduct in office. The Respondent, through his above-described conduct, has violated Fla. Stat. §1012.33 Fla. Stat.., and 6A-5.056(2) (a) through (e) of the Florida Administrative Code, which defines “misconduct”. (2) “Misconduct in Office” means one or more of the following: (a) A violation of the Code of Ethics of the Education Profession in Florida as adopted in Rule 6B-1.001, F.A.Cuyz (b) A violation of the Principles of Professional Conduct for the Education Profession in Florida as adopted in Rule 6B-1.006, F.A.C.; (é) A violation of the adopted school board rules; (da) Behavior that disrupts the student’s learning environment; or (e) Behavior that reduces the teacher’s ability or his or her colleagues’ ability to effectively perform duties. C. INCOMPETENCY 40. Respondent’s actions constitute incompetency. The Respondent, through his above-described conduct has violated Fla. State. §1012.33 and Rule 6A-5.056(3) (a) and (b) of the 41. a2. Florida Administrative Code. His actions show an inability, failure or lack of fitness to discharge the required duty as a result of inefficiency or incapacity. die “Inefficiency” means one or more of the following: te Failure to perform duties prescribed by law; Ba Failure to communicate appropriately with and relate to students; 3. Failure to communicate appropriately with and relate to colleagues, administrators, subordinates, or parents. 4. Excessive absences or tardiness. 2. “Incapacity” means one or more of the following: Lx Lack of adequate physical ability. D. GROSS INSUBORDINATION Respondent’s actions constitute gross insubordination. “Gross insubordination” means the intentional refusal to obey a direct order, reasonable in nature, and given by and with proper authority; misfeasance, or malfeasance as to involve failure in the performance of the required duties. Respondent violated prior directives relating to his being absent without notice during instructional time. 10 E. WILLFUL NEGLECT OF DUTY 43. Respondent’s actions constitute willful neglect of duty. “Willful neglect of duty” means intentional or reckless failure to carry out required duties. 44. Respondent’s absence/failure to supervise is violative of previous directives. 45. Respondent failed to perform his duties as an educator and instructor by being at work under the influence of alcohol and cocaine. 46. Respondent further failed to perform his duties as an educator by being absent from class. F. SCHOOL BOARD POLICY 2400 47. Respondent is in violation of School Board Policy 2400 (1), which prohibits “possession or use of a controlled substance, including alcohol”, on all school board property and at school sponsored activities. 48. School Board Policy 2400 (1) also strictly prohibits Employees from “reporting to work or being on duty while under the influence of alcohol or a controlled substance.?” 49. Furthermore, Respondent is in violation of School Board Policy 2400 (3), which states that “[e]ach Board employee must refrain from the unlawful manufacture, distribution, ? Emphasis added. dispensing, possession or use of a controlled substance, including alcohol, in the workplace”. 50. School Board Policy 2400 (5) requires that “[a]n employee who tests positive shall? be recommended for discipline action up to and including termination of employment.” G. SCHOOL BOARD POLICY 4008 51. Respondent is in violation of School Board Policy 4008, which requires all employees who have been issued contracts to comply with the provisions of the Florida School Code, State Board Regulations and regulations and policies of the Board. 52. Furthermore, School Board Policy 4008(B) requires that “members of instructional staff shall perform the following functions:” 1. Comply with the Code of Ethics and the Principles of Professional Conduct of the Education Profession in Florida. x kek * 3. Infuse in the classroom, the District’s adopted Character Education Traits of Respect, Honesty, Kindness, Self-control, Tolerance, Cooperation, Responsibility and Citizenship. we ke O* Bis Conform to all rules and regulations that may be prescribed by the State Board and by the School Board. 3 Emphasis added. 12 53. School Board Policy 4008 (C) requires that: [i]nstructional personnel must be on duty a minimum of seven and one-half (7 1/2) hours daily‘. . . . For teachers working a full day, - a teacher should not leave the school grounds without the permission of the principal.. . .“[a]Jl1l members of the instructional staff shall be expected to teach a full schedule of classes®, unless prior approval from the Area Superintendent or Superintendent of Schools has obtained.” H. SCHOOL BOARD POLICY 4.9 54. Pursuant to School Board Policy 4.9, ™“[e]mployees been are expected to comply with workplace policies, procedures and regulations, local, state and federal laws; and State Board Rules, both in and out of the work place.” 55. Respondent is also in violation of various Section Category B Offenses which prohibit the following: * kk co) Unlawful possession, use or being under influence of a controlled substance’®. xk kk 4 Emphasis added. 5 Emphasis added. ° Emphasis added. II, the m) Any violation of [t]he Code of Ethics of the Education Professional in the State of Florida- State Board of Education Administrative Rule. “* € € p) Insubordination, which is defined as a continuing or intentional failure to obey a direct order, reasonable in nature and given by and with proper authority. r) Failure to comply with School Board policy, state law, or appropriate contractual agreements. DEMAND FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, based upon the foregoing, Petitioner, Robert W. Runcie, Superintendent of Schools, recommends that the School Board terminate the Respondent, Craig Dudley, based upon the foregoing facts and legal authority. EXECUTED this &9™ day of August, 2018. ROBERT W. RUNCIE, Superintendent of Schools, Broward County Respectfully submitted: Tria Lawton-Russell, Esq. Administrative Counsel 14 NOTICE If you wish to contest the charges, you must, within 15 days calendar after receipt of the written notice, submit a written request for a hearing to Robert W. Runcie, Superintendent, Broward County School District, 600 374 Ave., Ft. Lauderdale, FL, 33301. If timely requested, such hearing shall be conducted by an administrative law judge assigned by the Division of Administrative Hearings of the Department of Management Services. The hearing shall be conducted within 60 days after receipt of the written appeal in accordance with chapter 120, Florida Statutes. FAILURE TO TIMELY REQUEST A HEARING WILL RESULT IN A WAIVER OF THE RIGHT TO CONTEST THE CHARGES. IF YOU WANT TO HIRE AN ATTORNEY, YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED BY AN ATTORNEY IN THIS MATTER. 15 RETURN OF SERVICE LETTER, NOTICE and ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT Case Number. N/A Plaintiff: ROBERT W. RUNCIE, VS. Defendant: CRAIG DUDLEY, For: Tria Lawton-Russell ADMINISTRATIVE COUNSEL, BROWARD DISTRICT SCHOOLS 600 SE 3rd Ave Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Received by Professional Process Servers on the 30th day of August, 2048 at 12:30 pm to be served on MR. CRAIG DUDLEY, 3301 N.W. 47TH TERRACE, LAUDERDALE LAKES, FL 33319. |, Henri J. Werner, do hereby affirm that on the 5th day of September, 2048 at 8:10 pm, |: INDIVIDUALLY/PERSONALLY served by delivering a true copy of the LETTER, NOTICE and ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT with the date and hour of service endorsed thereon by me, to: MR. CRAIG DUDLEY at the address of: 3301 N.W. 47TH TERRACE, LAUDERDALE LAKES, FL 33319, and informed said person of the contents therein, in compliance with state statutes. Description of Person Served: Age: 35+, Sex: M, Race/Skin Color: BLACK, Height: 5’9, Weight: 200, Hair: BALD, Glasses: N Under penalty of perjury, | declare that | have read the foregoing and that the facts stated in it are true, that! am a Sheriff Appointed Process Server in the county in which this defendant/witness was served and have no interest in the above action. Pursuant to FS 92.525(2), no notary is required Henk SPS#847 Professional Process Servers & investigators, Inc. 1749 N.E. 26th Street, Suite A Wilton Manors, FL 33305 (954) 566-2523 Our Job Serial Number: FIS-2018014145 Copytight © 1982-2018 Databace Services, Inc. - Process Server's Toolnox V7 2p

Docket for Case No: 18-006215TTS
Issue Date Proceedings
Dec. 20, 2019 Petitioner's Exceptions to Recommended Order filed.
Dec. 20, 2019 Agency Final Order filed.
Aug. 12, 2019 Respondent's Response to Petitioner's Exceptions to the Recommended Order filed.
Aug. 01, 2019 Petitioner's Exceptions to Recommended Order filed.
Jul. 18, 2019 (Amended) Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
Jul. 17, 2019 Recommended Order (hearing held April 9, 2019). CASE CLOSED.
Jul. 17, 2019 Recommended Order cover letter identifying the hearing record referred to the Agency.
Jun. 17, 2019 Respondent's Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Jun. 17, 2019 Petitioner's Proposed Recommended Order filed.
Jun. 13, 2019 Notice of Substitution of Counsel filed (Douglas Griffin).
May 21, 2019 Order Granting Extension of Time.
May 16, 2019 Agreed Motion for Extension of Time to File Proposed Recommended Orders filed.
May 03, 2019 Supplemental Notice of Filing Transcript.
May 03, 2019 Notice of Filing Transcript.
May 03, 2019 Transcript of Proceedings (not available for viewing) filed.
Apr. 09, 2019 CASE STATUS: Hearing Held.
Apr. 05, 2019 Amended Joint Pre-hearing Stipulation (as to Petitioner's Exhibit List only) filed.
Apr. 02, 2019 Joint Pre-hearing Stipulation filed.
Feb. 26, 2019 Re-notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum (P.L., change as to location) filed.
Feb. 14, 2019 Amended Notice of Hearing (hearing set for April 9 through 11, 2019; 9:30 a.m.; Fort Lauderdale, FL; amended as to Location).
Feb. 13, 2019 Notice of Taking Telephonic Deposition Duces Tecum (M.S.) filed.
Feb. 12, 2019 Notice of Taking Deposition Duces Tecum (P.L.) filed.
Feb. 12, 2019 Notice of Taking Videotaped Deposition (C.D.) filed.
Jan. 25, 2019 Order Granting Continuance and Rescheduling Hearing (hearing set for April 9 through 11, 2019; 9:00 a.m.; Fort Lauderdale, FL).
Jan. 24, 2019 Joint Motion for Continuance filed.
Dec. 21, 2018 Notice of Unavailability filed.
Dec. 14, 2018 Notice of Service of Petitioner's Second Request for Production filed.
Nov. 29, 2018 Order of Pre-hearing Instructions.
Nov. 29, 2018 Notice of Hearing (hearing set for February 12 and 13, 2019; 9:00 a.m.; Fort Lauderdale, FL).
Nov. 28, 2018 Joint Response to Initial Order filed.
Nov. 26, 2018 Notice of Service of Petitioner's First Set of Interrogatories, First Request for Production, and First Request for Admissions filed.
Nov. 21, 2018 Initial Order.
Nov. 20, 2018 Petition for Administrative Hearing filed.
Nov. 20, 2018 Administrative Complaint filed.
Nov. 20, 2018 Agency action letter filed.
Nov. 20, 2018 Agenda Request Form filed.
Nov. 20, 2018 Referral Letter filed.

Orders for Case No: 18-006215TTS
Issue Date Document Summary
Dec. 20, 2019 Agency Final Order
Jul. 17, 2019 Recommended Order Petitioner proved that Respondent violated State Board of Education rules and school board policies. This constitutes just cause to suspend him without back pay. Recommend suspension and reinstatement without back pay.
Source:  Florida - Division of Administrative Hearings

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer