Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Lee Hocker, 19-10924 (2019)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 19-10924 Visitors: 12
Filed: Dec. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 19-10924 Date Filed: 12/05/2019 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 19-10924 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:18-cr-00098-GAP-GJK-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LEE HOCKER, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (December 5, 2019) Before JORDAN, NEWSOM and HULL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 19-10924 Date Filed: 12/05/2019 P
More
           Case: 19-10924   Date Filed: 12/05/2019   Page: 1 of 2


                                                        [DO NOT PUBLISH]



            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 19-10924
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

               D.C. Docket No. 6:18-cr-00098-GAP-GJK-1



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                 versus

LEE HOCKER,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Middle District of Florida
                     ________________________

                            (December 5, 2019)

Before JORDAN, NEWSOM and HULL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 19-10924    Date Filed: 12/05/2019   Page: 2 of 2


      Meghan Collins, appointed counsel for Lee Hocker in this direct criminal

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Our

independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the

relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Hocker’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer