Filed: Dec. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 19-12079 Date Filed: 12/26/2019 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 19-12079 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:17-cr-00276-WS-B-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JAMES JEROME REED, a.k.a. Bookie, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (December 26, 2019) Before JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, and NEWSOM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 19-12
Summary: Case: 19-12079 Date Filed: 12/26/2019 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 19-12079 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:17-cr-00276-WS-B-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JAMES JEROME REED, a.k.a. Bookie, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (December 26, 2019) Before JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, and NEWSOM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 19-120..
More
Case: 19-12079 Date Filed: 12/26/2019 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 19-12079
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:17-cr-00276-WS-B-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JAMES JEROME REED,
a.k.a. Bookie,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
________________________
(December 26, 2019)
Before JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, and NEWSOM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 19-12079 Date Filed: 12/26/2019 Page: 2 of 2
Richard E. Shields, appointed counsel for James Jerome Reed in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant
and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire
record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Reed’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
2