Elawyers Elawyers

United States v. Charlton Morris, 19-11560 (2019)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 19-11560 Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 27, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 19-11560 Date Filed: 12/27/2019 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 19-11560 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:18-cr-00159-RBD-LRH-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CHARLTON MORRIS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (December 27, 2019) Before WILSON, LUCK and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 19-11560 Date Filed: 12/2
More
           Case: 19-11560    Date Filed: 12/27/2019   Page: 1 of 2


                                                          [DO NOT PUBLISH]



            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 19-11560
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

               D.C. Docket No. 6:18-cr-00159-RBD-LRH-1



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                   versus


CHARLTON MORRIS,

                                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Middle District of Florida
                     ________________________

                            (December 27, 2019)

Before WILSON, LUCK and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 19-11560    Date Filed: 12/27/2019   Page: 2 of 2


      Charles Taylor, appointed counsel for Charlton Morris in this direct criminal

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Our

independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the

relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Morris’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer