Filed: Mar. 17, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 17, 2020
Summary: Case: 19-13606 Date Filed: 03/17/2020 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 19-13606 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:17-cr-00246-KD-MU-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LASIEKA JAUWANE LEE, a.k.a. Momo, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (March 17, 2020) Before GRANT, LAGOA, and HULL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 19-13606 Date
Summary: Case: 19-13606 Date Filed: 03/17/2020 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 19-13606 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:17-cr-00246-KD-MU-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LASIEKA JAUWANE LEE, a.k.a. Momo, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (March 17, 2020) Before GRANT, LAGOA, and HULL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 19-13606 Date F..
More
Case: 19-13606 Date Filed: 03/17/2020 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 19-13606
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:17-cr-00246-KD-MU-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
LASIEKA JAUWANE LEE,
a.k.a. Momo,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
________________________
(March 17, 2020)
Before GRANT, LAGOA, and HULL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 19-13606 Date Filed: 03/17/2020 Page: 2 of 2
Arthur Madden, appointed counsel for Lasieka Lee in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). The
Government has moved to enforce the appeal waiver contained in Lee’s plea
agreement.
The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal
waiver in Lee’s plea agreement is GRANTED to the extent that Lee seeks to
appeal her sentence. See United States v. Bushert,
997 F.2d 1343, 1350–51 (11th
Cir. 1993) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced if it was made knowingly and
voluntarily); United States v. Grinard-Henry,
399 F.3d 1294, 1296 (11th Cir.
2005) (“An appeal waiver includes the waiver of the right to appeal difficult or
debatable legal issues or even blatant error.”); United States v. Puentes-Hurtado,
794 F.3d 1278, 1284–85 (11th Cir. 2015) (appeal waivers do not bar challenges to
the enforceability of the plea agreement or validity of the plea).
Further, our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Lee’s conviction and sentence are
AFFIRMED.
2