Filed: Oct. 31, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1455 MEILAN LIN, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted: October 23, 2019 Decided: October 31, 2019 Before KING and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joshua Bardavid, New York, New York, for Petitioner. Joseph H. Hunt, Assistant Attorney General,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1455 MEILAN LIN, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted: October 23, 2019 Decided: October 31, 2019 Before KING and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joshua Bardavid, New York, New York, for Petitioner. Joseph H. Hunt, Assistant Attorney General, P..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-1455
MEILAN LIN,
Petitioner,
v.
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted: October 23, 2019 Decided: October 31, 2019
Before KING and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joshua Bardavid, New York, New York, for Petitioner. Joseph H. Hunt, Assistant Attorney
General, Paul Fiorino, Senior Litigation Counsel, Katherine A. Smith, Office of
Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Meilan Lin, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, petitions for
review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing her appeal
from the Immigration Judge’s decision denying Lin’s application for asylum and
withholding of removal. We have considered Lin’s claims after thoroughly reviewing the
record and conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of
the agency’s factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial
evidence supports the Board’s decision, see INS v. Elias-Zacarias,
502 U.S. 478, 481
(1992).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board.
See In re Lin (B.I.A. Mar. 29, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2