Filed: Nov. 06, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1252 In re: PETITIONER THOMAS MOUYER RENRICK, IV, a/k/a T-Mack, a/k/a T, a/k/a Mack, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (6:11-cr-00338-JMC-16) Submitted: October 25, 2019 Decided: November 6, 2019 Before WILKINSON, AGEE and RUSHING, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas Mouyer Renrick, IV, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CU
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1252 In re: PETITIONER THOMAS MOUYER RENRICK, IV, a/k/a T-Mack, a/k/a T, a/k/a Mack, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (6:11-cr-00338-JMC-16) Submitted: October 25, 2019 Decided: November 6, 2019 Before WILKINSON, AGEE and RUSHING, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas Mouyer Renrick, IV, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CUR..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-1252
In re: PETITIONER THOMAS MOUYER RENRICK, IV, a/k/a T-Mack, a/k/a T,
a/k/a Mack,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (6:11-cr-00338-JMC-16)
Submitted: October 25, 2019 Decided: November 6, 2019
Before WILKINSON, AGEE and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas Mouyer Renrick, IV, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Thomas Mouyer Renrick, IV, petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district
court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order
from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket
reveals that, on August 30, 2019, the district court denied Renrick’s § 2255 motion as
untimely filed. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Renrick’s case,
we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
PETITION DENIED
2