Filed: Jan. 24, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-7289 REX I. HATFIELD; EVERLY K. HATFIELD, Petitioners - Appellants, v. D. L. YOUNG, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Irene C. Berger, District Judge. (5:18-cv-01265) Submitted: January 21, 2020 Decided: January 24, 2020 Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rex I. Ha
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-7289 REX I. HATFIELD; EVERLY K. HATFIELD, Petitioners - Appellants, v. D. L. YOUNG, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Irene C. Berger, District Judge. (5:18-cv-01265) Submitted: January 21, 2020 Decided: January 24, 2020 Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rex I. Hat..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-7289
REX I. HATFIELD; EVERLY K. HATFIELD,
Petitioners - Appellants,
v.
D. L. YOUNG, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at
Beckley. Irene C. Berger, District Judge. (5:18-cv-01265)
Submitted: January 21, 2020 Decided: January 24, 2020
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rex I. Hatfield, Everly K. Hatfield, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Rex I. Hatfield and Everly K. Hatfield, federal prisoners, appeal the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on their
joint 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2018) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Hatfield v. Young, No. 5:18-cv-01265 (S.D.W. Va.
Sept. 3, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2