Filed: Jan. 28, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-7341 CHARLES KEE, a/k/a O.P.G., a/k/a Billy Bad Ass, a/k/a G.F., a/k/a 9 Tray, a/k/a Punisher, a/k/a Ali, a/k/a O. G. Pun, a/k/a Ali Talib Abdul Skakur Muslum, Petitioner - Appellant, v. B.M. ANTONELLI, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (1:19-cv-00217-MGL) Submitted: January 23, 2020 Decided: January 28, 20
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-7341 CHARLES KEE, a/k/a O.P.G., a/k/a Billy Bad Ass, a/k/a G.F., a/k/a 9 Tray, a/k/a Punisher, a/k/a Ali, a/k/a O. G. Pun, a/k/a Ali Talib Abdul Skakur Muslum, Petitioner - Appellant, v. B.M. ANTONELLI, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (1:19-cv-00217-MGL) Submitted: January 23, 2020 Decided: January 28, 202..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-7341
CHARLES KEE, a/k/a O.P.G., a/k/a Billy Bad Ass, a/k/a G.F., a/k/a 9 Tray, a/k/a
Punisher, a/k/a Ali, a/k/a O. G. Pun, a/k/a Ali Talib Abdul Skakur Muslum,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
B.M. ANTONELLI, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken.
Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (1:19-cv-00217-MGL)
Submitted: January 23, 2020 Decided: January 28, 2020
Before WYNN, DIAZ, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Kee, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Charles Kee, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Kee’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2018)
petition without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kee
v. Antonelli, No. 1:19-cv-00217-MGL (D.S.C. Sept. 11, 2019). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2