Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Akeda Pearson v. Board of Education, 19-2121 (2020)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 19-2121 Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 23, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 23, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-2121 DR. AKEDA PEARSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY; MAMIE PERKINS, Interim Superintendent, in her official capacity, Defendants - Appellees, and ARLEN LIVERMAN, Deputy Superintendent; GEORGE ARLOTTO, Chief of Staff, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:17-cv-02358-CCB) Submitted: Ma
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-2121 DR. AKEDA PEARSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY; MAMIE PERKINS, Interim Superintendent, in her official capacity, Defendants - Appellees, and ARLEN LIVERMAN, Deputy Superintendent; GEORGE ARLOTTO, Chief of Staff, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:17-cv-02358-CCB) Submitted: March 12, 2020 Decided: March 23, 2020 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DIAZ, Circuit Judge, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Akeda Pearson, Appellant Pro Se. Kemp Walden Hammond, ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Akeda Pearson appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants in Pearson’s employment discrimination suit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pearson v. Board of Educ. Of Anne Arundel Cnty., No. 1:17-cv-02358-CCB (D. Md. Sept. 10, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer