Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Jane Doe v. City of Baton Rouge, 19-30277 (2019)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 19-30277 Visitors: 2
Filed: Nov. 20, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 19-30277 Summary Calendar JANE DOE, Plaintiff - Appellant v. CITY OF BATON ROUGE; JAMES WEBER; CHARLES DOTSON; STEPHEN MURPHY; S. CAREY, ET AL, Defendants - Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:19-CV-48 Before JOLLY, JONES, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Jane Doe appeals the district court’s order dismissing her case with prejudice, arguing that the dismi
More
           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT


                                    No. 19-30277
                                  Summary Calendar


JANE DOE,

              Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

CITY OF BATON ROUGE; JAMES WEBER; CHARLES DOTSON;
STEPHEN MURPHY; S. CAREY, ET AL,

              Defendants - Appellees



                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Middle District of Louisiana
                              USDC No. 3:19-CV-48


Before JOLLY, JONES, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       Jane Doe appeals the district court’s order dismissing her case with
prejudice, arguing that the dismissal should have been without prejudice. We
agree and therefore REVERSE.
       “[A] plaintiff has an absolute right to dismiss a lawsuit before the
defendant has filed an answer or summary judgment motion.” Carter v. United



       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
                                 No. 19-30277
States, 
547 F.2d 258
, 259 (5th Cir. 1977).       The defendants here had no
opportunity to do either of those things—they had, after all, not been served
with the complaint. The plaintiff thus still possessed the legal right to dismiss
her case without prejudice. See FED. R. CIV. PRO. 41(a)(1). The judgment is
REVERSED, and the case is remanded with instructions to enter an order
dismissing Jane Doe’s complaint without prejudice.




                                       2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer