Filed: Nov. 27, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 19-10494 Document: 00515216497 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/27/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 19-10494 November 27, 2019 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SUSANN NELSON, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas No. 3:17-CR-449-1 Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
Summary: Case: 19-10494 Document: 00515216497 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/27/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 19-10494 November 27, 2019 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SUSANN NELSON, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas No. 3:17-CR-449-1 Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: ..
More
Case: 19-10494 Document: 00515216497 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/27/2019
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
No. 19-10494 November 27, 2019
Conference Calendar
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff−Appellee,
versus
SUSANN NELSON,
Defendant−Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
No. 3:17-CR-449-1
Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Susann Nelson
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in
5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case: 19-10494 Document: 00515216497 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/27/2019
No. 19-10494
moves to withdraw and files a brief per Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738
(1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Nelson has
not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant por-
tions of the record. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal pre-
sents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibili-
ties herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2