Case: 19-50057      Document: 00515259257         Page: 1    Date Filed: 01/06/2020




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                       United States Court of Appeals
                                                                                Fifth Circuit


                                    No. 19-50057                              FILED
                                 Conference Calendar                    January 6, 2020
                                                                         Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                              Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

GODOFREDO OLMOS-SOLIS, also known as Alfredo Olmos, also known as
Galfredo Olmos, also known as Goldofredo Solis Olmos, also known as Golfredo
Olmos,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Western District of Texas
                             USDC No. 1:18-CR-338-1


Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Godofredo Olmos-
Solis has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California, 

(1967), and United States v. Flores, 

(5th Cir. 2011). Olmos-Solis has not filed a response. We have reviewed
counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We


       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 19-50057    Document: 00515259257    Page: 2   Date Filed: 01/06/2020


                                No. 19-50057

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw
is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                      2