Filed: Mar. 20, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 20, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 18-60302 March 20, 2020 _ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, Plaintiff - Appellee v. ALL AMERICAN CHECK CASHING, INCORPORATED; MID-STATE FINANCE, INCORPORATED; MICHAEL E. GRAY, Individually, Defendants - Appellants _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi _ (Opinion March 3, 2020, 5 Cir., 2020, 2020 WL 1026927 )
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 18-60302 March 20, 2020 _ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, Plaintiff - Appellee v. ALL AMERICAN CHECK CASHING, INCORPORATED; MID-STATE FINANCE, INCORPORATED; MICHAEL E. GRAY, Individually, Defendants - Appellants _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi _ (Opinion March 3, 2020, 5 Cir., 2020, 2020 WL 1026927 ) ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_____________________ United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
No. 18-60302
March 20, 2020
_____________________
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU,
Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
ALL AMERICAN CHECK CASHING, INCORPORATED; MID-STATE
FINANCE, INCORPORATED; MICHAEL E. GRAY, Individually,
Defendants - Appellants
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Mississippi
__________________________
(Opinion March 3, 2020, 5 Cir., 2020,
2020 WL 1026927)
Before OWEN, Chief Judge, JONES, SMITH, STEWART, DENNIS, ELROD,
SOUTHWICK, HAYNES, GRAVES, HIGGINSON, COSTA, WILLETT,
DUNCAN, ENGELHARDT, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges. 1
BY THE COURT:
A majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not
disqualified having voted in favor, on the Court’s own motion, to rehear this
case en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc
with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. Pursuant to 5th Cir. R.
41.3, the panel opinion in this case dated March 3, 2020, is vacated.
1 Judge Ho is recused and did not participate in this decision.