Filed: Dec. 10, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 19-1022 _ Tyrong Godbold, lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant, v. John Hammons, individually and in his official capacities; Patrick Langley, individually and in his official capacities; The City of Hot Springs, a municipal corporation and public body corporate and politic; Brandon Jones, individually and in his official capacities; David Flory, individually and in his official capacity as former Chief of Police; Jason Stachey, i
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 19-1022 _ Tyrong Godbold, lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant, v. John Hammons, individually and in his official capacities; Patrick Langley, individually and in his official capacities; The City of Hot Springs, a municipal corporation and public body corporate and politic; Brandon Jones, individually and in his official capacities; David Flory, individually and in his official capacity as former Chief of Police; Jason Stachey, in..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 19-1022
___________________________
Tyrong Godbold,
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant,
v.
John Hammons, individually and in his official capacities; Patrick Langley,
individually and in his official capacities; The City of Hot Springs, a municipal
corporation and public body corporate and politic; Brandon Jones, individually
and in his official capacities; David Flory, individually and in his official capacity
as former Chief of Police; Jason Stachey, in his official capacity as Chief of Police
Hot Springs Police Department,
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees.
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Arkansas - Hot Springs
____________
Submitted: December 4, 2019
Filed: December 10, 2019
[Unpublished]
____________
Before COLLOTON, BENTON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Tyrong Godbold appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Following a careful review, we conclude
that the district court did not err in granting summary judgment. See Johnson v.
Blaukat,
453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th Cir. 2006) (grant of summary judgment is
reviewed de novo). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1
The Honorable Susan O. Hickey, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the Western District of Arkansas.
-2-