Filed: Dec. 27, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 18-2551 _ Makeyta Renea Jones lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Manor Care Health Services lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis _ Submitted: December 20, 2019 Filed: December 27, 2019 [Unpublished] _ Before BENTON, KELLY, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. In this employment discrimination action, Makeyta Jones appeals afte
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 18-2551 _ Makeyta Renea Jones lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Manor Care Health Services lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis _ Submitted: December 20, 2019 Filed: December 27, 2019 [Unpublished] _ Before BENTON, KELLY, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. In this employment discrimination action, Makeyta Jones appeals after..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 18-2551
___________________________
Makeyta Renea Jones
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Manor Care Health Services
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
____________
Submitted: December 20, 2019
Filed: December 27, 2019
[Unpublished]
____________
Before BENTON, KELLY, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
In this employment discrimination action, Makeyta Jones appeals after the
district court1 dismissed some of her claims under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), and
1
The Honorable John A. Ross, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.
the district court2 later dismissed her remaining claims under Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 12(b)(6). Having carefully reviewed the record and the arguments on
appeal, we conclude Jones’s claims were properly dismissed. See Moore v. Sims,
200
F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (reviewing de novo dismissal under
§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)); see also Kelly v. City of Omaha,
813 F.3d 1070, 1075 (8th Cir.
2016) (reviewing de novo grant of motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6)).
Accordingly, we affirm, see 8th Cir. R. 47B; and we deny Jones’s pending motions.
______________________________
2
The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.
-2-