Filed: Dec. 30, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 19-1377 _ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Trevor Scott Ray lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of South Dakota - Rapid City _ Submitted: December 23, 2019 Filed: December 30, 2019 [Unpublished] _ Before STRAS, WOLLMAN, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Trevor Ray appeals the district court1 order denying his motion for a new t
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 19-1377 _ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Trevor Scott Ray lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of South Dakota - Rapid City _ Submitted: December 23, 2019 Filed: December 30, 2019 [Unpublished] _ Before STRAS, WOLLMAN, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Trevor Ray appeals the district court1 order denying his motion for a new tr..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 19-1377
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Trevor Scott Ray
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of South Dakota - Rapid City
____________
Submitted: December 23, 2019
Filed: December 30, 2019
[Unpublished]
____________
Before STRAS, WOLLMAN, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Trevor Ray appeals the district court1 order denying his motion for a new trial
and denying his requests for copies of documents. Our review of the record satisfies
1
The Honorable Jeffrey L. Viken, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the District of South Dakota.
us that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for a new
trial. See United States v. Grover,
511 F.3d 779, 783 (8th Cir. 2007) (denial of
motion for new trial based on newly discovered evidence is reviewed for abuse of
discretion). We also find no basis for reversal of the district court’s ruling on Ray’s
requests for documents. The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-