Filed: Nov. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 17-50358 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:16-cr-00824-JFW-1 HEON-CHEOL CHI, ORDER AMENDING Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Filed November 19, 2019 Before: Johnnie B. Rawlinson and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges, and Benjamin H. Settle, * District Judge. ORDER The opinion filed on August 30, 2019, is amended as follows: Slip opinion page 21: DELETE . In its place ADD . * The Honorable Benjamin H. Settl
Summary: FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 17-50358 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:16-cr-00824-JFW-1 HEON-CHEOL CHI, ORDER AMENDING Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Filed November 19, 2019 Before: Johnnie B. Rawlinson and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges, and Benjamin H. Settle, * District Judge. ORDER The opinion filed on August 30, 2019, is amended as follows: Slip opinion page 21: DELETE . In its place ADD . * The Honorable Benjamin H. Settle..
More
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 17-50358 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:16-cr-00824-JFW-1 HEON-CHEOL CHI, ORDER AMENDING Defendant-Appellant. OPINION Filed November 19, 2019 Before: Johnnie B. Rawlinson and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges, and Benjamin H. Settle, * District Judge. ORDER The opinion filed on August 30, 2019, is amended as follows: Slip opinion page 21: DELETE . In its place ADD . * The Honorable Benjamin H. Settle, United States District Judge for the Western District of Washington, sitting by designation. 2 UNITED STATES V. CHI The amended sentence shall read, “In another, Chi sent Kinemetrics an email providing them with confidential information about a competing company.” With the foregoing amendment, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judges Rawlinson and Bea have voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Settle so recommends. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED. No additional petitions for rehearing will be permitted.
