Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Morris v. Commissioner, Docket No. 42101 (1958)

Court: United States Tax Court Number: Docket No. 42101 Visitors: 8
Judges: Fossan
Attorneys: Bernard J. Boyle, Esq ., for the respondent.
Filed: Jul. 16, 1958
Latest Update: Dec. 05, 2020
Louis Morris, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent
Morris v. Commissioner
Docket No. 42101
United States Tax Court
July 16, 1958, Filed

1958 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 123">*123 Decision will be entered under Rule 50.

1. Held, petition dismissed for lack of prosecution, and deficiencies and additions to tax under section 294 (d) (1) (A) and (d) (2), I. R. C. 1939, found as set forth in the notice of deficiency.

2. Held, respondent's burden of proof as to fraud issue is adequately supported by facts alleged in the answer and deemed admitted as a result of Tax Court's order under Rule 18, entered after notice and default by petitioner.

Bernard J. Boyle, Esq., for the respondent.
Van Fossan, Judge.

VAN FOSSAN

30 T.C. 928">*928 OPINION.

The Commissioner determined deficiencies in income tax and additions to tax under sections 293 (b), 294 (d) (1) (A), and 294 (d) (2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, against the petitioner as follows:

Additions to tax
YearDeficiency
Sec. 293 (b)Sec.Sec.
294 (d) (1) (A)294 (d) (2)
1946$ 125.00$ 62.50$ 12.50$ 7.50
19471,448.59724.29152.2691.35
1948972.63486.3155.30
1949956.10478.0557.37
19501,605.99802.99160.6096.36

These deficiencies and additions to tax were made the subject of a jeopardy assessment.

Petitioner, Louis Morris, is a resident1958 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 123">*124 of Osceola, Indiana. He filed his income tax returns for the years here involved with the then collector of internal revenue for the district of Indiana.

Petitioner's income tax returns for each of the years 1946 through 1950 were false and fraudulent with intent to evade tax. Some part of the deficiency for each of the years is due to fraud with intent to evade tax.

Petitioner failed to file a declaration of estimated tax in each of the years 1946, 1947, and 1950, and failed to make a declaration of 80 per cent of the tax due in each of the years 1948 and 1949.

30 T.C. 928">*929 There was no appearance for the petitioner at the hearing and no evidence was presented in his behalf.

The respondent moved that the proceeding be dismissed for lack of prosecution and that the Court find the deficiencies in income tax and additions to tax under section 294 (d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, as set forth in the notice of deficiency. It is so ordered.

The respondent also moved for judgment on the fraud issue as to which he had the burden of proof. Affirmative allegations in the answer deemed admitted, by an order of this Court pursuant to Tax Court Rule 18, because of petitioner's failure1958 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 123">*125 to reply after due notice, satisfy the respondent's burden on the fraud issue. Robert Kenneth Black, 19 T.C. 474.

Respondent submitted in evidence a schedule showing partial payments of the deficiencies for the years 1947, 1948, and 1949, and overpayments for the years 1946 and 1950. Therefore,

Decision will be entered under Rule 50.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer